• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血糖控制与 2 型糖尿病患者的冠状动脉支架失败。

Glycemic Control and Coronary Stent Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 16;84(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.012
PMID:38752901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of glycemic control in the risk of stent failure in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to study whether poor glycemic control is associated with a higher risk of stent failure in subjects with T2D.

METHODS

This observational study included all patients in Sweden with T2D who underwent implantation of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) during 2010 to 2020. The exposure variable was the updated mean of glycated hemoglobin (HbA). Individuals were stratified by glycemic control, with HbA 6.1% to 7.0% (43-53 mmol/mol) as the reference group. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of stent failure (in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis). The main result was analyzed in a complete cases model. Sensitivity analyses were performed for missing data and a model with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 52,457 individuals (70,453 DES). The number of complete cases was 24,411 (29,029 DES). The median follow-up was 6.4 years. The fully adjusted HR was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.80-1.52) for HbA of ≤5.5% (≤37 mmol/mol), 1.02 (95% CI: 0.85-1.23) for HbA of 5.6% to 6.0% (38-42 mmol/mol), 1.25 (95% CI: 1.11-1.41) for HbA of 7.1% to 8.0% (54-64 mmol/mol), 1.30 (95% CI: 1.13-1.51) for HbA of 8.1% to 9.0% (65-75 mmol/mol), 1.46 (95% CI: 1.21-1.76) for HbA of 9.1% to 10.0% (76-86 mmol/mol), and 1.33 (95% CI: 1.06-1.66) for HbA of ≥10.1% (≥87 mmol/mol). Sensitivity analyses did not change the main result.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant association between poor glycemic control and a higher risk of stent failure driven by in-stent restenosis.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚血糖控制对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者支架失败风险的影响。

目的

本研究旨在探讨血糖控制不佳是否与 T2D 患者支架失败风险增加相关。

方法

本观察性研究纳入了 2010 年至 2020 年期间在瑞典接受第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)植入的所有 T2D 患者。暴露变量为糖化血红蛋白(HbA)的更新平均值。个体按血糖控制分层,HbA 为 6.1%至 7.0%(43-53mmol/mol)作为参考组。主要终点为支架失败(支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成)的发生。主要结果在完整病例模型中进行分析。对缺失数据和以死亡为竞争风险的模型进行敏感性分析。

结果

研究人群包括 52457 名患者(70453 枚 DES)。完整病例数为 24411 例(29029 枚 DES)。中位随访时间为 6.4 年。完全调整后的 HR 为 HbA≤5.5%(≤37mmol/mol)为 1.10(95%CI:0.80-1.52),HbA 为 5.6%至 6.0%(38-42mmol/mol)为 1.02(95%CI:0.85-1.23),HbA 为 7.1%至 8.0%(54-64mmol/mol)为 1.25(95%CI:1.11-1.41),HbA 为 8.1%至 9.0%(65-75mmol/mol)为 1.30(95%CI:1.13-1.51),HbA 为 9.1%至 10.0%(76-86mmol/mol)为 1.46(95%CI:1.21-1.76),HbA≥10.1%(≥87mmol/mol)为 1.33(95%CI:1.06-1.66)。敏感性分析并未改变主要结果。

结论

我们发现血糖控制不佳与支架内再狭窄驱动的支架失败风险增加之间存在显著关联。

相似文献

1
Glycemic Control and Coronary Stent Failure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖控制与 2 型糖尿病患者的冠状动脉支架失败。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 16;84(3):260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Visit-to-visit HbA variability is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,2 型糖尿病患者的HbA 变异性与支架内再狭窄相关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 4;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01111-7.
3
Stent Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetes Mellitus: Does Glycemic Control Matter?糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架失败:血糖控制有影响吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 16;84(3):273-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.052.
4
A Randomized Comparison of Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: The RESERVOIR Clinical Trial.随机比较载药无聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架与载持久聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架在糖尿病患者中的应用:RESERVOIR 临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.020.
5
Impact of prediabetes and diabetes on 3-year outcome of patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents in two large-scale randomized clinical trials.在两项大规模随机临床试验中,新代药物洗脱支架治疗的患者中糖尿病前期和糖尿病对 3 年结局的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Oct 30;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01405-4.
6
Glycemic Control Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血糖控制状况及长期临床结局
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004157.
7
Effect of diabetes duration on the relationship between glycaemic control and risk of death in older adults with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病病程对老年 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制与死亡风险关系的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Feb;22(2):231-242. doi: 10.1111/dom.13891. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Impact of Hemoglobin A1c Levels on Residual Platelet Reactivity and Outcomes After Insertion of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents (from the ADAPT-DES Study).糖化血红蛋白水平对冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术后残余血小板反应性及预后的影响(来自ADAPT-DES研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
Risk of first stroke in people with type 2 diabetes and its relation to glycaemic control: A nationwide observational study.2 型糖尿病患者首次中风的风险及其与血糖控制的关系:一项全国性观察研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Feb;22(2):182-190. doi: 10.1111/dom.13885. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes in relation to achieved glycemic control. A Danish nationwide study.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂在糖尿病相关心血管结局与血糖控制达标情况的关系。一项丹麦全国性研究。
J Diabetes. 2024 Jun;16(6):e13560. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13560.

引用本文的文献

1
Research advances in the etiology of in-stent restenosis of coronary arteries.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄病因学的研究进展
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 18;12:1585102. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1585102. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Analysis of SYNTAX and BCIS Jeopardy Score of Diabetics Versus Non-Diabetic Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病复杂冠状动脉疾病患者的SYNTAX和BCIS危险评分的比较分析
J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3433. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103433.
3
Proteomic Analysis and 2-Hydroxyisobutyrylation Profiling in Metabolic Syndrome Induced Restenosis.
代谢综合征诱导再狭窄中的蛋白质组学分析及2-羟基异丁酰化谱分析
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2025 Apr 24;24(6):100978. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.100978.
4
Trends in prognosis and use of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.糖尿病合并冠心病患者 SGLT2i 和 GLP-1RA 的预后和应用趋势。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Aug 7;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02365-1.