Department of Cardiology, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France.
HerzZentrum Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun 24;17(12):1485-1495. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 May 16.
The safety profile of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) repair techniques is well established, but residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a concern.
The authors sought to assess the impact of residual TR severity post-TTV repair on survival.
We evaluated the survival rate at 2 years of 613 patients with severe isolated functional TR who underwent TTV repair in TRIGISTRY according to the severity of residual TR at discharge using a 3-grade (mild, moderate, and severe) or 4-grade scheme (mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe).
Residual TR was none/mild in 33%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 15%. The 2-year adjusted survival rates significantly differed between the 3 groups (85%, 70%, and 44%, respectively; restricted mean survival time [RMST]: P = 0.0001). When the 319 patients with moderate residual TR were subdivided into mild to moderate (n = 201, 33%) and moderate to severe (n = 118, 19%), the adjusted survival rate was also significantly different between groups (85%, 80%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; RMST: P = 0.001). Survival was significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe residual TR compared to patients with mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.006). No difference in survival rates was observed between patients with no/mild and mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.67) or between patients with moderate to severe and severe residual TR (P = 0.96).
The moderate residual TR group was heterogeneous and encompassed patients with markedly different clinical outcomes. Refining TR grade classification with a more granular 4-grade scheme improved outcome prediction. Our results highlight the importance of achieving a mild to moderate or lower residual TR grade during TTV repair, which could define a successful intervention.
经导管三尖瓣(TTV)修复技术的安全性已得到充分证实,但仍存在残余三尖瓣反流(TR)的问题。
作者旨在评估 TTV 修复术后残余 TR 严重程度对生存率的影响。
我们根据出院时残余 TR 严重程度,使用 3 级(轻度、中度和重度)或 4 级方案(轻度、轻度至中度、中度至重度和重度)评估了 TRIGISTRY 中 613 例严重孤立性功能性 TR 患者的 2 年生存率。
残余 TR 为无/轻度占 33%,中度占 52%,重度占 15%。3 组之间 2 年校正生存率差异显著(分别为 85%、70%和 44%;受限平均生存时间[RMST]:P=0.0001)。当将 319 例中度残余 TR 患者进一步分为轻度至中度(n=201,33%)和中度至重度(n=118,19%)时,组间校正生存率也存在显著差异(分别为 85%、80%、55%和 44%;RMST:P=0.001)。与轻度至中度残余 TR 患者相比,中度至重度残余 TR 患者的生存率显著降低(P=0.006)。无/轻度和轻度至中度残余 TR 患者的生存率无差异(P=0.67),或中度至重度和重度残余 TR 患者的生存率无差异(P=0.96)。
中度残余 TR 组具有异质性,包含临床结局明显不同的患者。使用更精细的 4 级方案对 TR 分级进行细化分类,可提高预后预测能力。我们的研究结果强调了在 TTV 修复术中实现轻度至中度或更低残余 TR 分级的重要性,这可能定义为成功的干预。