• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持本土马赛阿拉利利农林复合保护系统,以改善东非牧场的社区生计和生物多样性保护。

Sustaining indigenous Maasai Alalili silvo-pastoral conservation systems for improved community livelihood and biodiversity conservation in East African rangelands.

机构信息

Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management, School of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303649. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303649
PMID:38753680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11098305/
Abstract

Alalili system is one among the fewest remnant African indigenous and local knowledge systems that is traditionally practiced by Maasai pastoral communities to conserve certain portions of rangeland resources such as pastures and water for subsequent grazing during dry seasons. Despite its existence, East African rangelands face diverse threats from tenure security, unsustainable practices, climate, and land-use change that are notably endangering the biodiversity, livelihoods, and ecosystems in the landscape. Like other indigenous conservation systems, the sustainability of Alalili systems is being threatened, as Maasai communities are in transition due to continuous socio-cultural transformations coupled with increased livestock and human populations. We aimed to capture and document the existing occurrence and potential of Alalili systems as a pathway to improve resilience and sustain both biodiversity conservation and community livelihoods in rangeland areas of northern Tanzania. A cross-sectional research design was applied with the adoption of both purposive and stratified random sampling techniques to distinctively characterize the Alalili systems by land use and tenure types. Our results identified the existence of both communal and private Alalili systems. Their sizes varied significantly across types (t = 4.4646, p < 0.001) and land uses (F = 3.806, df = 3, p = 0.0123). While many (82%) of these Alalili systems are found in the communal land, our observations show a re-practice of Alalili systems in the private land is considered largely a re-emerging strategy for securing pastures in the face of local and global change. More than half (73%) of Alalili systems were found within game-controlled areas with little representation (about 8%) in non-protected land. Therefore, their sustainability is threatened by anthropogenic and climatic pressures, making their persistence more vulnerable to extinction. We recommend mainstreaming these practices into core pasture production and management areas, facilitating their reinforcement into policy and practices.

摘要

阿拉拉利系统是非洲本土和当地知识体系中极少数仍然存在的系统之一,传统上由马赛游牧社区使用,以保护牧场资源和水源等某些部分,以便在旱季后续放牧。尽管它的存在,东非的牧场仍然面临着多种威胁,包括土地保有权的不安全、不可持续的做法、气候和土地利用变化,这些都对生物多样性、生计和景观中的生态系统构成了严重威胁。与其他本土保护系统一样,阿拉拉利系统的可持续性也受到威胁,因为马赛社区正在经历社会文化转型,加上牲畜和人口的增加,社区正在发生变化。我们的目的是捕捉和记录阿拉拉利系统的现有存在和潜力,作为改善北部坦桑尼亚牧场地区的弹性和维持生物多样性保护和社区生计的途径。我们采用了横断面研究设计,并采用了有针对性和分层随机抽样技术,以独特的方式根据土地利用和土地保有权类型来描述阿拉拉利系统。我们的研究结果表明,存在公共和私人的阿拉拉利系统。它们的大小在不同类型(t = 4.4646,p < 0.001)和土地利用类型(F = 3.806,df = 3,p = 0.0123)之间存在显著差异。尽管这些阿拉拉利系统中的许多(82%)都存在于公共土地上,但我们的观察表明,在私人土地上重新实践阿拉拉利系统是一种在面对当地和全球变化时确保牧场的新兴策略。在受控制的游戏区内发现了超过一半(73%)的阿拉拉利系统,而在非保护区内,它们的代表性很少(约 8%)。因此,它们的可持续性受到人为和气候压力的威胁,使得它们的生存更易灭绝。我们建议将这些实践纳入核心牧场生产和管理领域,促进将其纳入政策和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/b2ef17f3867d/pone.0303649.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/bdfa642b9ce9/pone.0303649.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/342ae8fd7bc5/pone.0303649.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c9d4ea1bad49/pone.0303649.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c09d3e1cc8c7/pone.0303649.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/d5f9a4c2c08b/pone.0303649.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/3a772359b51f/pone.0303649.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c72e148d53c6/pone.0303649.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/b2ef17f3867d/pone.0303649.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/bdfa642b9ce9/pone.0303649.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/342ae8fd7bc5/pone.0303649.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c9d4ea1bad49/pone.0303649.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c09d3e1cc8c7/pone.0303649.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/d5f9a4c2c08b/pone.0303649.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/3a772359b51f/pone.0303649.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/c72e148d53c6/pone.0303649.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd7d/11098305/b2ef17f3867d/pone.0303649.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustaining indigenous Maasai Alalili silvo-pastoral conservation systems for improved community livelihood and biodiversity conservation in East African rangelands.维持本土马赛阿拉利利农林复合保护系统,以改善东非牧场的社区生计和生物多样性保护。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303649. eCollection 2024.
2
Indigenous knowledge and rangelands' biodiversity conservation in Tanzania: success and failure.坦桑尼亚的本土知识与牧场生物多样性保护:成功与失败
Biodivers Conserv. 2020;29(14):3863-3876. doi: 10.1007/s10531-020-02060-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
3
The role of pastoralism in regulating ecosystem services.畜牧业在调节生态系统服务中的作用。
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Nov;35(2):435-444. doi: 10.20506/rst.35.2.2534.
4
Wilder rangelands as a natural climate opportunity: Linking climate action to biodiversity conservation and social transformation.狂野的牧场作为一种自然气候机遇:将气候行动与生物多样性保护和社会转型联系起来。
Ambio. 2024 May;53(5):678-696. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01976-4. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
5
Indigenous knowledge of South African bird and rangeland ecology is effective for informing conservation science.南非鸟类和牧场生态的本土知识对于为保护科学提供信息是有效的。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Apr 15;284:112041. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112041. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?草原多围场放牧:为什么研究结果和牧场主经验之间存在感知上的二分法?
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:699-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
7
Agrobiodiversity and in situ conservation in ethnic minority communities of Xishuangbanna in Yunnan Province, Southwest China.中国西南部云南省西双版纳少数民族社区的农业生物多样性与原地保护
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 May 15;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0158-7.
8
Pastoralism in the highest peaks: Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in the alpine Himalaya.高山畜牧业:传统放牧系统在维持喜马拉雅高寒地区生物多样性和生态系统功能中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245221. eCollection 2021.
9
Using remotely sensed imagery to monitor savanna rangeland deterioration through woody plant proliferation: a case study from communal and biodiversity conservation rangeland sites in Mokopane, South Africa.利用遥感图像监测热带稀树草原牧场的退化:来自南非莫科潘社区和生物多样性保护牧场的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 May;176(1-4):293-311. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1583-4. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
10
Land use, REDD+ and the status of wildlife populations in Yaeda Valley, northern Tanzania.土地利用、REDD+ 和坦桑尼亚北部 Yaeda 山谷野生动物种群的状况。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214823. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of grazing management practices, topographic position, and land cover type on soil organic carbon fractions in semi-arid rangelands of Kenya.肯尼亚半干旱草原放牧管理措施、地形位置和土地覆盖类型对土壤有机碳组分的影响
Carbon Balance Manag. 2025 Aug 21;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13021-025-00319-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways of degradation in rangelands in Northern Tanzania show their loss of resistance, but potential for recovery.坦桑尼亚北部牧场退化的途径表明它们的抵抗力丧失了,但有恢复的潜力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 22;13(1):2417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29358-6.
2
Integrating stakeholders' perspectives and spatial modelling to develop scenarios of future land use and land cover change in northern Tanzania.整合利益相关者的观点和空间建模,以制定坦桑尼亚北部未来土地利用和土地覆盖变化的情景。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 12;16(2):e0245516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245516. eCollection 2021.
3
Classification and characterisation of livestock production systems in northern Tanzania.
坦桑尼亚北部畜牧业生产系统的分类与特征描述。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0229478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229478. eCollection 2020.
4
Indigenous knowledge and rangelands' biodiversity conservation in Tanzania: success and failure.坦桑尼亚的本土知识与牧场生物多样性保护:成功与失败
Biodivers Conserv. 2020;29(14):3863-3876. doi: 10.1007/s10531-020-02060-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Indigenous knowledge networks in the face of global change.面对全球变化的本土知识网络。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9913-9918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821843116. Epub 2019 May 1.
6
Land use for animal production in global change studies: Defining and characterizing a framework.全球变化研究中的动物生产用地:定义和描述框架。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Nov;23(11):4457-4471. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13732. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Sampling methods in Clinical Research; an Educational Review.临床研究中的抽样方法;教育综述。
Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e52. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
8
Adaptive Capacity in Tanzanian Maasailand: Changing strategies to cope with drought in fragmented landscapes.坦桑尼亚马赛兰的适应能力:在破碎化景观中应对干旱的不断变化的策略。
Glob Environ Change. 2013 Jun;23(3):588-597. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.010.
9
Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis.对数变换及其对数据分析的影响。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;26(2):105-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.02.009.
10
Climate change mitigation and adaptation in the land use sector: from complementarity to synergy.土地利用部门的气候变化减缓与适应:从互补到协同。
Environ Manage. 2014 Sep;54(3):420-32. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0331-x. Epub 2014 Jul 22.