Touponse Gavin, Malacon Karen, Li Guan, Yoseph Ezra, Han Summer, Zygourakis Corinna
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Quantative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Apr 25;23:100382. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.
To examine how providers' experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.
Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003-2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)-a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients-to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.
Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200-44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83-0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14-0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1-1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.
While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.
研究报告称患者的种族、收入和教育程度会影响脊柱融合手术的结果;然而,较少有研究考察诸如接触多样性或文化敏感性等医疗服务提供者因素的影响。
探讨医疗服务提供者对不同患者群体的经验如何影响脊柱融合手术的结果。
对2003年至2021年在Clinformatics® Data Mart国家数据库中接受腰椎和颈椎融合手术的39680例患者进行回顾性研究。我们使用医疗服务提供者患者种族多样性指数(pRDI)——一种已发表的衡量医生接触不同患者情况的指标——根据医疗服务提供者的类别(I、II、III)将患者分组,其中由III类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者,其外科医生接触的患者群体最多样化。对倾向评分匹配队列进行多变量回归模型分析,以研究患者社会经济地位和医疗服务提供者类别与术后结果之间的关联。
与白人患者相比,黑人患者出院回家的比例降低(比值比0.67;95%置信区间0.54 - 0.83)。与由I类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者相比,由III类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者住院时间延长(系数0.62;95%置信区间0.43 - 0.81)、费用增加(系数36800;95%置信区间29200 - 44400),出院回家的比例降低(比值比0.90;95%置信区间0.83 - 0.97)。与由I类医疗服务提供者治疗的患者相比,由II类医疗服务提供者治疗的亚洲患者再入院率降低(比值比0.38;95%置信区间0.14 - 0.96),由III类医疗服务提供者治疗的黑人患者出院回家的比例增加(比值比1.41;95%置信区间1.1 - 1.9)。
虽然我们的研究发现了两个具体实例,即服务于多样化患者群体的医疗服务提供者治疗的少数族裔患者脊柱手术结果有所改善,但总体而言,我们的研究结果喜忧参半。本研究为未来研究奠定了基础,以便更好地理解医疗服务提供者的pRDI如何影响接受腰椎和颈椎手术患者的手术结果。