• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支区域起搏数据采集注册研究结果,一项使用 Tendril STS 2088 塑形导丝驱动的导联进行心脏传导系统起搏的国际多中心研究。

Result of the left bundle branch area pacing data collection registry, an international multicenter study of conduction system pacing with a Tendril STS 2088 stylet-driven lead.

机构信息

Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Geisinger Heart Institute, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA.

Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;35(7):1452-1460. doi: 10.1111/jce.16274. Epub 2024 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/jce.16274
PMID:38757909
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing (LBBAP) has been proposed as an alternative therapy option in patients indicated for cardiac pacing to treat bradycardia or heart failure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LBBAP in patients implanted with a Tendril 2088 stylet-driven lead.

METHODS

The international retrospective data collection registry included 11 sites from 5 countries globally. Patients with attempted implants of the Tendril lead in the LBBA were followed for at least 6 months post the implant attempt. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious adverse events and the composite of LBBA capture threshold of ≤2.0 V and R-wave amplitudes ≥5 mV (or ≥value at implant), respectively.

RESULTS

Of 221 patients with attempted implants of the Tendril 2088 lead in the LBBA, 91.4% (202/221) had successful implants for LBBAP. Regardless of the LBBAP implant success, all patients were followed for at least 6 months (8.7 ± 7.3 months). Baseline characteristics: 44% female, 84% ≥65 years old, 34% coronary artery disease, and 86% of primary indications for pacemaker implant. Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met (freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious adverse device effects of 99.5% and electrical performance composite success rate of 93%). The capture thresholds in LBBAP at implant and 6 months were 0.8 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ± 0.1 ms and 0.8 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ± 0.1 ms. The rate of patients with capture threshold rise ≥1 V was 1.5% through 6 months. The R-wave amplitudes in LBBAP at implant and 6 months were 9.3 ± 3.2 mV and 10.6 ± 3.0 mV.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multicenter study demonstrates that the stylet-driven Tendril™ STS 2088 lead is safe and effective for LBBAP with high success and low complication rates.

摘要

引言

左束支区域(LBBA)起搏(LBBAP)已被提议作为治疗心动过缓或心力衰竭的心脏起搏适应证患者的替代治疗选择。本研究旨在评估在植入 Tendril 2088 调弯导丝驱动导线的患者中进行 LBBAP 的安全性和有效性。

方法

这项国际性回顾性数据收集研究纳入了来自全球 5 个国家的 11 个中心。对尝试植入 Tendril 导线至 LBBA 的患者进行至少 6 个月的随访。主要安全性和有效性终点分别为 LBBAP 相关严重不良事件发生率和 LBBA 夺获阈值(LBBA 夺获阈值定义为 ≤2.0 V 且 R 波振幅≥5 mV[或植入时的振幅值])的复合终点发生率。

结果

在 221 例尝试植入 Tendril 2088 导线至 LBBA 的患者中,91.4%(202/221)成功植入 LBBAP。无论 LBBAP 植入是否成功,所有患者的随访时间均至少为 6 个月(8.7±7.3 个月)。基线特征为:44%为女性,84%年龄≥65 岁,34%患有冠状动脉疾病,86%为植入起搏器的主要适应证。主要安全性和有效性终点均达到(LBBAP 相关严重不良事件发生率为 99.5%,电性能复合终点成功率为 93%)。植入时和 6 个月时的 LBBA 夺获阈值分别为 0.8±0.3 V@0.4±0.1 ms 和 0.8±0.3 V@0.4±0.1 ms。6 个月时,阈值上升≥1 V 的患者比例为 1.5%。植入时和 6 个月时的 LBBA 的 R 波振幅分别为 9.3±3.2 mV 和 10.6±3.0 mV。

结论

这项多中心大型研究表明,调弯导丝驱动的 Tendril™ STS 2088 导线在用于 LBBAP 时安全且有效,成功率高,并发症发生率低。

相似文献

1
Result of the left bundle branch area pacing data collection registry, an international multicenter study of conduction system pacing with a Tendril STS 2088 stylet-driven lead.左束支区域起搏数据采集注册研究结果,一项使用 Tendril STS 2088 塑形导丝驱动的导联进行心脏传导系统起搏的国际多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;35(7):1452-1460. doi: 10.1111/jce.16274. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Result of the Physiologic Pacing Registry, an international multicenter prospective observational study of conduction system pacing.生理性起搏注册研究结果:一项国际性多中心前瞻性观察研究,研究对象为心脏传导系统起搏。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Dec;20(12):1617-1625. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads: A multicenter study.鞘内驱动起搏导线行左束支区域起搏的初步经验:一项多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1540-1549. doi: 10.1111/jce.15558. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
5
Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.左束支区域起搏的临床结局:多中心欧洲 MELOS 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4161-4173. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac445.
6
Left bundle branch area pacing using a stylet-driven, retractable-helix lead: Short-term results from a prospective multicenter IDE trial (the BIO-CONDUCT study).鞘内可回收螺旋电极导线行左束支区域起搏:前瞻性多中心 IDE 研究(BIO-CONDUCT 研究)的短期结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Nov;21(11):2242-2249. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 19.
7
Preliminary experience of permanent left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-directed pacing lead without delivery sheath.鞘内无导丝指向性起搏导线行永久性左束支区域起搏的初步经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;45(8):993-1003. doi: 10.1111/pace.14504. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.左束支区域起搏抢救冠状静脉内起搏失败或双心室起搏无反应:来自国际 LBBAP 协作研究组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1272-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.024. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
9
Left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads with a new delivery sheath: A comparison with lumen-less leads.使用新型输送鞘的 Stylet 驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏:与无腔导线的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):439-448. doi: 10.1111/jce.14851. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: Results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry.左束支区域起搏与右心室起搏的临床结局比较:来自 Geisinger-Rush 传导系统起搏注册研究的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者的希氏束起搏与左束支起搏
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 16;12(10):2356. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102356.