Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov;34(11):6967-6979. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10783-8. Epub 2024 May 17.
Some patients undergo both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) sequentially as part of the same evaluation for acute cholecystitis (AC). Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of US and CT in the diagnosis of AC.
Databases were searched for relevant published studies through November 2023. The primary objective was to compare the head-to-head performance of US and CT using surgical intervention or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. For the secondary analysis, all individual US and CT studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of imaging findings was also evaluated.
Sixty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In the primary analysis of head-to-head studies (n = 5), CT had a pooled sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 78.4-88.2%) versus 79.0% (95% CI, 68.8-86.6%) of US (p = 0.44). The pooled specificity of CT was 94% (95% CI, 82.0-98.0%) versus 93.6% (95% CI, 79.4-98.2%) of US (p = 0.85). The concordance of positive or negative test between both modalities was 82.3% (95% CI, 72.1-89.4%). US and CT led to a positive change in management in only 4 to 8% of cases, respectively, when ordered sequentially after the other test.
The diagnostic performance of CT is comparable to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, with a high rate of concordance between the two modalities.
A subsequent US after a positive or negative CT for suspected acute cholecystitis may be unnecessary in most cases.
When there is clinical suspicion of acute cholecystitis, patients will often undergo both CT and US. CT has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The concordance rate between CT and US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is 82.3%.
一些患者在急性胆囊炎(AC)的同一评估中先后接受计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声(US)检查。我们的目标是进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较 US 和 CT 在 AC 诊断中的诊断性能。
通过数据库检索 2023 年 11 月前发表的相关研究。主要目的是比较 US 和 CT 在以手术干预或临床随访为参考标准的头对头表现。对于二次分析,分析了所有单独的 US 和 CT 研究。确定了汇总的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)以及 95%置信区间(CI)。还评估了影像学表现的患病率。
64 项研究符合纳入标准。在头对头研究的主要分析中(n=5),CT 的汇总敏感性为 83.9%(95%CI,78.4-88.2%),而 US 为 79.0%(95%CI,68.8-86.6%)(p=0.44)。CT 的汇总特异性为 94%(95%CI,82.0-98.0%),而 US 为 93.6%(95%CI,79.4-98.2%)(p=0.85)。两种方式的阳性或阴性测试之间的一致性为 82.3%(95%CI,72.1-89.4%)。当在另一种检查后顺序进行时,US 和 CT 分别仅导致 4%至 8%的管理阳性变化。
CT 的诊断性能与 US 相当,用于诊断急性胆囊炎,两种方式之间具有较高的一致性。
在疑似急性胆囊炎的情况下,在 CT 检查阳性或阴性后进行后续 US 检查可能在大多数情况下没有必要。
当临床怀疑急性胆囊炎时,患者通常会同时接受 CT 和 US 检查。CT 对急性胆囊炎的诊断具有与 US 相似的敏感性和特异性。CT 和 US 对急性胆囊炎诊断的一致性率为 82.3%。