• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在通往更安全医疗保健的复杂征程中,我们如何与电子健康记录供应商合作?

How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care?

作者信息

Sittig Dean F, Ash Joan S, Wright Adam, Chase Dian, Gebhardt Eric, Russo Elise M, Tercek Colleen, Mohan Vishnu, Singh Hardeep

机构信息

UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6410 Fannin St. UTP 1100.43, Houston, TX, 77030.

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code BICC, Portland, OR, 97239-3098.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct;40(2):34-43. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21434. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1002/jhrm.21434
PMID:32648286
Abstract

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology released the Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) guides in 2014. Our group developed these guides covering key facets of both electronic health record (EHR) infrastructure (eg, system configuration, contingency planning for downtime, and system-to-system interfaces) and clinical processes (eg, computer-based provider order entry with clinical decision support, test result reporting, patient identification, and clinician-to-clinician communication). The SAFER guides encourage healthy relationships between EHR vendors and users. We conducted a qualitative study over 12 months. We visited 9 health care organizations ranging in size from 1-doctor outpatient clinics to large, multisite, multihospital integrated delivery networks. We interviewed and observed clinicians, IT professionals, and administrators. From the interview transcripts and observation field notes, we identified overarching themes: technical functionality, usability, standards, testing, workflow processes, personnel to support implementation and use, infrastructure, and clinical content. In addition, we identified health care organization-EHR vendor working relationships: marine drill sergeant, mentor, development partner, seller, and parasite. We encourage health care organizations and EHR vendors to develop healthy working relationships to help address the tasks required to design, develop, implement, and maintain EHRs required to achieve safer and higher quality health care.

摘要

美国国家卫生信息技术协调办公室于2014年发布了电子健康记录弹性安全保障因素(SAFER)指南。我们的团队制定了这些指南,涵盖电子健康记录(EHR)基础设施的关键方面(如系统配置、停机应急计划和系统间接口)以及临床流程(如具有临床决策支持的基于计算机的医嘱录入、检验结果报告、患者识别和临床医生之间的沟通)。SAFER指南鼓励EHR供应商与用户建立健康的关系。我们进行了为期12个月的定性研究。我们走访了9个医疗机构,规模从单医生门诊诊所到大型、多地点、多医院综合医疗网络不等。我们对临床医生、信息技术专业人员和管理人员进行了访谈和观察。从访谈记录和观察现场笔记中,我们确定了总体主题:技术功能、可用性、标准、测试、工作流程、支持实施和使用的人员、基础设施以及临床内容。此外,我们还确定了医疗机构与EHR供应商的工作关系:海军陆战队教官、导师、开发伙伴、销售方和寄生虫。我们鼓励医疗机构和EHR供应商建立健康的工作关系,以帮助完成设计、开发、实施和维护EHR所需的任务,从而实现更安全、更高质量的医疗保健。

相似文献

1
How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care?在通往更安全医疗保健的复杂征程中,我们如何与电子健康记录供应商合作?
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct;40(2):34-43. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21434. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.安全使用电子健康记录和健康信息技术系统:信任但要验证。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
3
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
4
Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.电子健康记录可用性:对十一家电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计过程的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1179-82. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv050. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
5
A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.一个用于评估电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计和可用性测试流程的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e35-e39. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw092.
6
The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.《SAFER指南》:助力各机构提高电子健康记录的安全性与有效性。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):418-23.
7
Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.通过行动计划目标预防糖尿病(ADAPT)决策支持系统在电子健康记录中整合基于护理的糖尿病前期咨询的可用性测试。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):636-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 23.
8
Advancing electronic health record vendor usability maturity: Progress and next steps.推进电子健康记录供应商可用性成熟度:进展和下一步措施。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):1029-1031. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa329.
9
Strategies for Primary Care Stakeholders to Improve Electronic Health Records (EHRs).基层医疗利益相关者改善电子健康记录(EHRs)的策略。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):126-34. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150212.
10
Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.比较电子健康记录可用性的障碍。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e191-e193. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw117.

引用本文的文献

1
What engagement strategies are useful in facilitating the implementation of electronic health records in health care settings? A rapid review of qualitative evidence synthesis using the normalization process theory.哪些参与策略有助于在医疗机构中推动电子健康记录的实施?运用常态化过程理论对定性证据综合进行的快速回顾。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241291286. doi: 10.1177/20552076241291286. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Implementation of a health information technology safety classification system in the Veterans Health Administration's Informatics Patient Safety Office.在退伍军人健康管理局的信息学患者安全办公室中实施健康信息技术安全分类系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jun 20;31(7):1588-1595. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae107.
3
Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey.实现更安全的电子健康记录现代化之旅的五大策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):940-942. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08331-z.
4
The role of organizations in shaping physician use of electronic health records.组织在塑造医生使用电子健康记录方面的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14203. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14203. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
5
Racism and Electronic Health Records (EHRs): Perspectives for research and practice.种族主义与电子健康记录(EHRs):研究与实践的视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):995-999. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad023.
6
Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.医疗和护理临床医生对医院电子病历可用性的看法:定性分析。
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):189-197. doi: 10.1177/18333583231154624. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
7
Status of the health information system in Ireland and its fitness to support health system performance assessment: a multimethod assessment based on stakeholder involvement.爱尔兰卫生信息系统的现状及其对支持卫生系统绩效评估的适宜性:基于利益相关者参与的多方法评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Nov 16;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00931-1.
8
Documentation dynamics: Note composition, burden, and physician efficiency.文档动态:记录的构成、负担和医生效率。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):674-685. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14097. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions.运用必要的想象力来保障电子健康记录的转换。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):1014-1018. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab291.