1Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.
6Imperial Brain & Spine Initiative, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 May 17;41(2):263-272. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231202. Print 2024 Aug 1.
The incidence of spondylodiscitis is rising across Europe, but the ideal treatment approach remains controversial. The choice between conservative and surgical therapies is ambiguous due to a lack of consensus. This European survey aimed to explore prevailing treatment paradigms for primary spondylodiscitis.
Spine neurosurgeons were invited through the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Spine Section's mailing list to participate in an online survey featuring 7 spondylodiscitis case vignettes. Along with general management queries, specific patient treatment questions were posed. Data analysis was performed using R software (version 4.0.4). The index of qualitative variation (IQV) was calculated to quantify the variability in responses.
A total of 130 responses were collected, comprising 86.9% board-certified neurosurgeons and 13.1% neurosurgeons in training, with an average of 11 years of practice. Most respondents performed 50-100 spine surgeries annually, with 66.7% specializing in spine surgery. An epidural empyema causing pronounced neurological deficits influenced 95.4% toward a surgical intervention, and mild neurological deficits and challenges in pathogen identification prompted 72.3% and 80%, respectively, to consider a surgical approach. Vertebral body destruction and spinal deformity directed 60% and 66.2%, respectively, toward surgery, whereas advanced age and comorbidities had a much smaller impact-5.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Clinical vignettes highlighted a predominant preference for conservative treatment in specific cases, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). The IQV values evaluated for each question ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, indicating low agreement across all questions among respondents. When examining the average IQV by country, intercountry variations in IQV were substantial, as illustrated by the diverse range of overall mean IQV values (0.15-0.85).
The findings reveal a significant variability in the treatment of spondylodiscitis among European neurosurgeons, with most neurosurgeons opting for conservative treatment. These diverse strategies, both between and within countries, highlight an imperative for evidence-backed guidelines and consensus statements for this grave condition.
欧洲各地的脊椎骨髓炎发病率正在上升,但理想的治疗方法仍存在争议。由于缺乏共识,保守治疗和手术治疗之间的选择并不明确。这项欧洲调查旨在探讨原发性脊椎骨髓炎的主要治疗模式。
通过欧洲神经外科学会脊柱分会的邮件列表邀请脊柱神经外科医生参与一项在线调查,该调查有 7 个脊椎骨髓炎病例。除了一般管理问题外,还提出了具体的患者治疗问题。使用 R 软件(版本 4.0.4)进行数据分析。计算定性变异指数(IQV)以量化反应的可变性。
共收集了 130 份回复,其中 86.9%为认证神经外科医生,13.1%为神经外科培训医生,平均从业年限为 11 年。大多数受访者每年进行 50-100 例脊柱手术,其中 66.7%专门从事脊柱手术。硬膜外脓肿导致明显的神经功能缺损,使 95.4%的医生倾向于手术干预,轻度神经功能缺损和病原体鉴定困难分别促使 72.3%和 80%的医生考虑手术治疗。椎体破坏和脊柱畸形分别使 60%和 66.2%的医生倾向于手术治疗,而年龄较大和合并症的影响较小-分别为 5.4%和 9.2%。临床病例强调了在特定情况下对保守治疗的主要偏好,具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。评估每个问题的 IQV 值范围为 0.88 至 0.99,表明受访者对所有问题的一致性都较低。当按国家检查平均 IQV 时,各国之间的 IQV 差异很大,总体平均 IQV 值的范围广泛(0.15-0.85)。
研究结果表明,欧洲神经外科医生在治疗脊椎骨髓炎方面存在显著差异,大多数神经外科医生选择保守治疗。这些不同的策略,无论是在国家之间还是在国家内部,都凸显了制定针对这种严重疾病的循证指南和共识声明的必要性。