Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jul;175:280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.035. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
Infra-low frequency neurofeedback training (ILF-NFT) has shown promise in addressing cognitive and affective distress symptoms across a range of psychiatric disorders. This study tested ILF-NFT's effects in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled longitudinal context in healthy psychology students. Across five weeks, forty-two healthy psychology students (aged 18-35) were randomly allocated into two groups, receiving ten sessions of 30 minutes of active and sham ILF-NFT. Dependent variables were measured before, following, and two months after the intervention and were comprised of: heartrate variability assessments as a measure of stress resilience; digit span, n-back, trail making and go-no-go task measures of executive functioning performance; and SCL-90-R, WHOQOL-Bref, and peak performance measures of subjective self-report. Statistical analysis was performed using an ANCOVA and compared across groups correcting for baseline differences and multiple comparisons. ANCOVA analyses revealed no significant differences across active and placebo groups in any dependent variables, when correcting for multiple comparisons. Thus, the remaining analyses focused on questionnaire correlations. Here, significant correlations were observed between the novel peak performance questionnaire with the SCL-90-R and WHOQOL-Bref, confirming its construct and retest validity. Despite several methodological limitations, including a potential type-2 error, this study highlights limited effects of ILF-NFT in healthy volunteers. Future research should thus focus on clinically driven experimental designs to explore ILF-NFT's potential in psychiatric contexts. Further research utilization of the novel peak performance questionnaire is recommended for measures of peak performance.
低频神经反馈训练(ILF-NFT)已显示出在解决一系列精神障碍的认知和情感困扰症状方面的潜力。本研究在健康心理学学生的双盲、安慰剂对照的纵向背景下测试了 ILF-NFT 的效果。在五周的时间里,42 名健康心理学学生(年龄在 18-35 岁之间)被随机分配到两组,分别接受十次 30 分钟的主动和假 ILF-NFT 治疗。在干预前后和两个月后测量了因变量,包括:心率变异性评估作为压力弹性的衡量标准;数字跨度、n-回、追踪和 Go/No-Go 任务的执行功能表现测量;以及 SCL-90-R、WHOQOL-Bref 和峰值表现的主观自我报告测量。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行统计分析,并在组间进行比较,以校正基线差异和多重比较。ANCOVA 分析显示,在主动和安慰剂组之间,在任何因变量上,当校正多重比较时,没有显著差异。因此,其余的分析集中在问卷相关性上。在这里,观察到新的峰值表现问卷与 SCL-90-R 和 WHOQOL-Bref 之间存在显著相关性,证实了其结构和重测有效性。尽管存在一些方法学限制,包括潜在的第二类错误,但本研究强调了 ILF-NFT 在健康志愿者中的有限效果。因此,未来的研究应侧重于基于临床的实验设计,以探索 ILF-NFT 在精神科环境中的潜力。建议进一步研究使用新的峰值表现问卷作为峰值表现的测量。