English Language and Literature, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
English Language and Literature, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Med Humanit. 2024 Aug 14;50(2):222-234. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2023-012859.
In the early twentieth century, childbirth was increasingly being viewed as a medical experience in North America. Women were encouraged to engage with 'scientific motherhood' by adhering to medical advice and undergoing the latest medical and technological interventions. Two movements simultaneously emerged that engaged with scientific motherhood: the positive eugenics movement, which sought to encourage reproduction among specific groups, and the twilight sleep movement, which promoted the use of pain management during childbirth. While these two distinct movements had different goals, they intersected both in their intended audiences (white, middle-class and upper-class American women) and in their prioritisation of medical and scientific authority. This article builds on work that has identified connections between twilight sleep and the eugenics movement to consider the role of twentieth-century magazines in rhetorically linking the eugenics and twilight sleep movements, and how this contributed to constructing the cultural role of the 'scientific mother'.As a key proponent of twilight sleep, the American monthly periodical is the focus of this investigation. Articles published in incorporated the rhetoric of the eugenics movement to promote twilight sleep and 'painless childbirth', while also engaging with concerns of the eugenics movement by framing the falling birthrate among American women as a social and political problem. Alongside the rhetorical framing within articles, we focus on visual material such as photographs that exhibit 'eugenic mothers' and healthy 'twilight sleep babies' to promote the method's safety and efficacy to American audiences. This article incorporates scholarship on early twentieth-century eugenics and photography, women's involvement in the eugenics movement, and twilight sleep and the politics of women's health. Through its analysis, this article demonstrates that the convergence of developments in obstetrics and the eugenics movement in popular media had complex implications for women's reproductive agency in the early twentieth century.
在 20 世纪早期,北美的分娩方式越来越被视为一种医学体验。人们鼓励女性通过遵循医学建议并接受最新的医学和技术干预来参与“科学母亲”。两个同时出现的运动与科学母亲有关:积极优生学运动,旨在鼓励特定群体的生育;以及黄昏睡眠运动,提倡在分娩过程中使用疼痛管理。虽然这两个截然不同的运动有不同的目标,但它们在目标受众(美国白种、中产阶级和上层阶级的女性)和对医学和科学权威的重视方面存在交集。本文在已确定黄昏睡眠与优生学运动之间联系的工作基础上,探讨了 20 世纪杂志在修辞上如何将优生学和黄昏睡眠运动联系起来,以及这如何有助于构建“科学母亲”的文化角色。作为黄昏睡眠的主要支持者,美国月刊 是本研究的重点。该杂志发表的文章采用了优生学运动的修辞来推广黄昏睡眠和“无痛分娩”,同时通过将美国女性出生率下降视为社会和政治问题来应对优生学运动的担忧。除了 文章中的修辞框架外,我们还关注视觉材料,如展示“优生母亲”和健康“黄昏睡眠婴儿”的照片,以向美国观众宣传该方法的安全性和有效性。本文结合了 20 世纪早期优生学和摄影方面的学术研究、女性参与优生学运动以及黄昏睡眠和妇女健康政治方面的研究。通过分析,本文表明,在流行媒体中,产科发展与优生运动的融合对 20 世纪早期妇女的生殖代理权产生了复杂的影响。