• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术时间模式:接受急诊胃肠穿孔手术的危重症患者的等待时间与手术结局。

Time-to-surgery paradigms: wait time and surgical outcomes in critically Ill patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hostpital, Yongin, Korea.

Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 May 17;24(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02452-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02452-w
PMID:38760752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11100233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Waiting time for emergency abdominal surgery have been known to be linked to mortality. However, there is no clear consensus on the appropriated timing of surgery for gastrointestinal perforation. We investigated association between wait time and surgical outcomes in emergency abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforations between January 2003 and September 2021. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines modeled the probability of each mortality according to wait time. The inflection point when mortality began to increase was used to define early and late surgery. Outcomes among propensity-score matched early and late surgical patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (RDs, with 95% CIs).

RESULTS

Mortality rates began to rise after 16 h of waiting. However, early and late surgery groups showed no significant differences in 30-day mortality (11.4% vs. 5.7%), ICU stay duration (4.3 ± 7.5 vs. 4.3 ± 5.2 days), or total hospital stay (17.4 ± 17.0 vs. 24.7 ± 23.4 days). Notably, patients waiting over 16 h had a significantly higher ICU readmission rate (8.6% vs. 31.4%). The APACHE II score was a significant predictor of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we were unable to reveal significant differences in mortality in the subgroup analysis, we were able to find an inflection point of 16 h through the RCS curve technique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Formal consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study, and ethical approval was obtained from the institutional research committee of our institution (B-2110-714-107) on 6 October 2021.

摘要

背景

众所周知,急诊腹部手术的等待时间与死亡率有关。然而,对于胃肠道穿孔的手术时机,目前尚无明确共识。我们研究了等待时间与急诊腹部手术手术结果之间的关系。

方法

本单中心回顾性队列研究评估了 2003 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间因胃肠道穿孔而行急诊手术的成年患者。风险调整的限制三次样条模型根据等待时间来预测每个死亡率的概率。死亡率开始增加的拐点用于定义早期和晚期手术。使用百分比绝对风险差异(RD,95%CI)比较倾向评分匹配的早期和晚期手术患者的结局。

结果

等待 16 小时后,死亡率开始上升。然而,早期和晚期手术组在 30 天死亡率(11.4%比 5.7%)、重症监护病房停留时间(4.3±7.5 比 4.3±5.2 天)或总住院时间(17.4±17.0 比 24.7±23.4 天)方面没有显著差异。值得注意的是,等待超过 16 小时的患者 ICU 再入院率显著更高(8.6%比 31.4%)。急性生理和慢性健康评分 II 是 30 天死亡率的显著预测因子。

结论

尽管我们无法在亚组分析中发现死亡率的显著差异,但我们能够通过 RCS 曲线技术找到 16 小时的拐点。

注册

由于研究的回顾性性质,正式同意被豁免,我们机构的机构研究委员会于 2021 年 10 月 6 日批准了该研究(B-2110-714-107)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/c8c1a381c76d/12893_2024_2452_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/235e59f179fa/12893_2024_2452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/7f1c7671608c/12893_2024_2452_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/05087bdbeb95/12893_2024_2452_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/e78765959a95/12893_2024_2452_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/c8c1a381c76d/12893_2024_2452_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/235e59f179fa/12893_2024_2452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/7f1c7671608c/12893_2024_2452_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/05087bdbeb95/12893_2024_2452_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/e78765959a95/12893_2024_2452_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e72c/11100233/c8c1a381c76d/12893_2024_2452_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-to-surgery paradigms: wait time and surgical outcomes in critically Ill patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation.手术时间模式:接受急诊胃肠穿孔手术的危重症患者的等待时间与手术结局。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 17;24(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02452-w.
2
The impact of timing of antibiotics on in-hospital outcomes after major emergency abdominal surgery.抗生素使用时机对重大急诊腹部手术后院内结局的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):221-227. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1026-4. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.髋部骨折手术成年患者等待时间与30天死亡率之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17606.
4
Effects of early enteral nutrition on patients after emergency gastrointestinal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.早期肠内营养对急诊胃肠手术后患者的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e323. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000323.
5
Outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery in patients with advanced cancer: Opportunities to reduce complications and improve palliative care.晚期癌症患者急诊腹部手术后的结局:减少并发症及改善姑息治疗的机会
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Sep;79(3):399-406. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000764.
6
Surgery for small bowel perforation in an Asian population: predictors of morbidity and mortality.亚洲人群小肠穿孔的手术治疗:发病率和死亡率的预测因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Mar;14(3):493-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1097-y. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
7
Association Between Dexamethasone and Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Large Clinical Database.地塞米松与危重症患者谵妄的关联:一项大型临床数据库的回顾性队列研究。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.027. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
8
Perioperative risk factors for in-hospital mortality after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.急诊胃肠道手术后院内死亡的围手术期危险因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4530. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004530.
9
The effect of positive balance on the outcomes of critically ill noncardiac postsurgical patients: a retrospective cohort study.正平衡对非心脏手术后重症患者预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Outcome following emergency surgery for refractory severe ulcerative colitis in a tertiary care centre in India.印度一家三级医疗中心难治性重症溃疡性结肠炎急诊手术后的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 30;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-5-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-abdominal sepsis in critically ill surgical patients: the relationship between cumulative fluid balance and serum sodium and chloride levels and in-hospital mortality.重症外科患者的腹腔内脓毒症:累积液体平衡与血清钠、氯水平及住院死亡率之间的关系
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;12:1608388. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1608388. eCollection 2025.
2
Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation?重新审视用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理学和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM)及朴茨茅斯 - POSSUM(P - POSSUM)评分:它们在回肠穿孔病例中是否有效?
Cureus. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):e65733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65733. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
Cubic splines to model relationships between continuous variables and outcomes: a guide for clinicians.用于模拟连续变量与结果之间关系的三次样条曲线:临床医生指南
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Apr;55(4):675-680. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0679-x. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
3
Readmission and hospital mortality after ICU discharge of critically ill cancer patients.
危重症癌症患者 ICU 出院后的再入院和住院死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0211240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211240. eCollection 2019.
4
Pneumoperitoneum.气腹。
Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Oct;98(5):915-932. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.06.004.
5
Increased risk of death and readmission after hospital discharge of critically ill patients in a developing country: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.发展中国家危重患者出院后死亡和再入院风险增加:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1090-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5252-3. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Validation of APACHE II scoring system at 24 hours after admission as a prognostic tool in urosepsis: A prospective observational study.入院 24 小时后 APACHE II 评分系统对尿脓毒症预后评估的验证:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):453-459. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.453. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
7
Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Risk Factors, Resource Use, and Outcomes. A Retrospective Cohort Study.再入院至重症监护病房:发生率、危险因素、资源利用和结局。一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1312-1319. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-851OC.
8
Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas.胃肠道穿孔、渗漏及瘘管的内镜治疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10542-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10542.
9
Risk prediction of ICU readmission in a mixed surgical and medical population.混合外科和内科人群 ICU 再入院风险预测。
J Intensive Care. 2015 Jun 26;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40560-015-0096-1. eCollection 2015.
10
Intensive care readmission: a contemporary review of the literature.重症监护病房再入院:文献的当代回顾。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Jun;30(3):121-37. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Dec 3.