• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲化工制造企业在促进工人安全使用条件的有效沟通方面的作用。

The role of European chemical manufacturing companies in promoting effective communication of conditions of safe use by workers.

机构信息

Product Stewardship, Belgian Shell NV, Brussels, Belgium.

Product Regulatory Services EMEAI, DOW Benelux BV, Terneuzen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):557-561. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae042.

DOI:10.1093/annweh/wxae042
PMID:38761129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229308/
Abstract

In 2006, the revised chemicals management legislation mandated that manufacturers of hazardous chemical substances conduct risk assessments for the entire substance life cycle. Additionally, they must communicate use-specific safe handling advice (exposure scenarios) to their customer, as annex to the Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Despite significant efforts to develop workable solutions for chemical mixtures, this goal has not yet been fully achieved. Therefore, a Cefic research project (LRI B23) was commissioned on how to ensure meaningful health risk communication for workers across supply chains. The research project determined that risk-based safe use advice generated by manufacturers, often does not reach the intended end-user and was seen as not tailored to specific user needs. Recipients of the advice are also not prepared to act based on information developed by suppliers. From an industry perspective, the complexity of supply chains and substance life cycles are considered major barriers for effective safe use communication. Exposure scenarios for substance use in industrial work environments are often perceived as adding little value compared to existing safe use arrangements required by other health, safety, and environmental legislation applicable to employers and duty-holders. To attain meaningful use-specific safe handling advice for workers, including those at non-industrial premises who may benefit most from such advice, knowledge transfer and close collaboration between manufacturers and formulators remain key elements, supported by enhanced regulatory appreciation.

摘要

2006 年,修订后的化学品管理法规要求危险化学品物质的制造商对整个物质生命周期进行风险评估。此外,他们必须将特定用途的安全处理建议(暴露场景)作为安全数据表 (SDS) 的附件传达给客户。尽管为开发可行的化学品混合物解决方案做出了重大努力,但这一目标尚未完全实现。因此,Cefic 委托进行了一项研究项目 (LRI B23),以研究如何确保供应链中的工人进行有意义的健康风险沟通。该研究项目确定,制造商生成的基于风险的安全使用建议通常无法到达预期的最终用户,并且被视为不针对特定用户的需求。建议的接收方也不准备根据供应商制定的信息采取行动。从行业角度来看,供应链和物质生命周期的复杂性被认为是有效安全使用沟通的主要障碍。与适用于雇主和责任方的其他健康、安全和环境法规要求的现有安全使用安排相比,工业工作环境中物质使用的暴露场景通常被认为附加值较低。为了为工人(包括那些可能从这些建议中受益最多的非工业场所的工人)提供有意义的特定用途安全处理建议,制造商和配方师之间的知识转移和密切合作仍然是关键要素,这需要增强监管意识。

相似文献

1
The role of European chemical manufacturing companies in promoting effective communication of conditions of safe use by workers.欧洲化工制造企业在促进工人安全使用条件的有效沟通方面的作用。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jul 8;68(6):557-561. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae042.
2
Generic exposure scenarios: their development, application, and interpretation under REACH.通用暴露场景:在《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)下的制定、应用及解读
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):451-64. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer022. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
[Recent prevention strategies and occupational risk analysis: Control Banding and Sobane].[近期预防策略与职业风险分析:控制分级法与索贝恩法]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2006 Jan-Mar;28(1):30-43.
4
Environmental Risk Assessment of Technical Mixtures Under the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals-A Regulatory Perspective.技术混合物的环境风险评估在欧洲化学品注册、评估、授权和限制制度下——监管视角。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 May;17(3):498-506. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4393. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
[Regulations for the protection of workers against the effects of hazardous substances at the workplace].[保护工人免受工作场所有害物质影响的规定]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Mar;51(3):266-73. doi: 10.1007/s00103-008-0456-2.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Exposure scenarios for workers.工人的暴露场景。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 1:S16-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500617. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
8
[Risk communication for protection against hazardous substances in the workplace].[工作场所中预防有害物质的风险沟通]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 May;65(5):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03530-1. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.一项针对瑞典工作场所化学风险管理人员对职业接触限值和 REACH 衍生无效应水平的态度的范围调查。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):611-620. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01493. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
[The safety data sheets of the paint and coatings sector: analysis of the items of most interest to health and safety in the workplace].[油漆和涂料行业的安全数据表:对工作场所健康与安全最具关注价值的项目分析]
Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):366-81.

本文引用的文献

1
ECETOC TRAv3: An In-depth Comparison of Publicly Available Measurement Data Sets With Modelled Estimates of Occupational Inhalation Exposure to Chemicals.ECETOC TRAv3:公开可用测量数据集与职业吸入暴露于化学品的模型估算值的深入比较。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Apr 21;67(4):496-507. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad001.
2
REACH Worker Exposure Assessments: Ensuring Meaningful Health Risk Communication.REACH 工人暴露评估:确保有意义的健康风险沟通。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Feb 13;67(2):182-194. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac072.
3
Consolidating exposure scenario information for mixtures--experiences and challenges.整合混合物暴露情景信息——经验与挑战
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Aug;58(7):793-805. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu031. Epub 2014 May 24.
4
Generic exposure scenarios: their development, application, and interpretation under REACH.通用暴露场景:在《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)下的制定、应用及解读
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jun;55(5):451-64. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer022. Epub 2011 May 6.