Suppr超能文献

中国人和荷兰人群中 CT 定义肺气肿的流行情况。

Ct-defined emphysema prevalence in a Chinese and Dutch general population.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jul;176:111503. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111503. Epub 2024 May 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We determine and compare the prevalence, subtypes, severity, and risk factors for emphysema assessed by low-dose CT(LDCT) in Chinese and Dutch general populations.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included LDCT scans of 1143 participants between May and October 2017 from a Chinese Cohort study and 1200 participants with same age range and different smoking status between May and October 2019 from a Dutch population-based study. An experienced radiologist visually assessed the scans for emphysema presence (≥trace), subtype, and severity. Logistic regression analyses, overall and stratified by smoking status, were performed and adjusted for fume exposure, demographic and smoking data.

RESULTS

The Chinese population had a comparable proportion of women to the Dutch population (54.9 % vs 58.9 %), was older (61.7 ± 6.3 vs 59.8 ± 8.1), included more never smokers (66.4 % vs 38.3 %), had a higher emphysema prevalence ([58.8 % vs 39.7 %], adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.06, 95 %CI = 1.68-2.53), and more often had centrilobular emphysema (54.8 % vs 32.8 %, p < 0.001), but no differences in emphysema severity. After stratification, only in never smokers an increased odds of emphysema was observed in the Chinese compared to the Dutch (aOR = 2.55, 95 %CI = 1.95-3.35). Never smokers in both populations shared older age (aOR = 1.59, 95 %CI = 1.25-2.02 vs 1.26, 95 %CI = 0.97-1.64) and male sex (aOR = 1.50, 95 %CI = 1.02-2.22 vs 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.26-2.96) as risk factors for emphysema.

CONCLUSIONS

Only never smokers had a higher prevalence of mainly centrilobular emphysema in the Chinese general population compared to the Dutch after adjusting for confounders, indicating that factors other than smoking, age and sex contribute to presence of CT-defined emphysema.

摘要

目的

我们确定并比较了通过低剂量 CT(LDCT)评估的中国人和荷兰普通人群中肺气肿的患病率、亚型、严重程度和危险因素。

方法

本横断面研究纳入了 2017 年 5 月至 10 月期间来自中国队列研究的 1143 名参与者和 2019 年 5 月至 10 月期间来自荷兰基于人群研究的 1200 名年龄范围相同但吸烟状况不同的参与者的 LDCT 扫描结果。一位有经验的放射科医生对扫描结果进行了肺气肿存在(≥痕迹)、亚型和严重程度的视觉评估。总体和按吸烟状况分层进行了 logistic 回归分析,并调整了烟雾暴露、人口统计学和吸烟数据。

结果

与荷兰人群相比,中国人群的女性比例相当(54.9% vs. 58.9%),年龄更大(61.7±6.3 vs. 59.8±8.1),从不吸烟者比例更高(66.4% vs. 38.3%),肺气肿患病率更高([58.8% vs. 39.7%],调整后的优势比,aOR=2.06,95%CI=1.68-2.53),且更常出现中央型肺气肿(54.8% vs. 32.8%,p<0.001),但肺气肿严重程度无差异。分层后,仅在从不吸烟者中,与荷兰相比,中国人发生肺气肿的优势比增加(aOR=2.55,95%CI=1.95-3.35)。来自两个国家的从不吸烟者均有更年长(aOR=1.59,95%CI=1.25-2.02 与 1.26,95%CI=0.97-1.64)和男性(aOR=1.50,95%CI=1.02-2.22 与 1.93,95%CI=1.26-2.96)作为肺气肿的危险因素。

结论

在调整混杂因素后,仅从不吸烟者中,与荷兰相比,中国人普通人群中主要为中央型肺气肿的患病率更高,表明除吸烟、年龄和性别以外的因素也可能导致 CT 定义的肺气肿的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验