Suppr超能文献

权衡碳排放交易和绿色证书的利弊:实现中国碳中和。

Grappling with the trade-offs of carbon emission trading and green certificate: Achieving carbon neutrality in China.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China.

School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China; Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing, 100083, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121101. Epub 2024 May 17.

Abstract

Although our knowledge of national carbon emission trading system and green certificate trading system are powerful incentive instruments that can deliver on increasingly ambitious climate targets in China, there remains an uncertainty of systems' structural reforms. This study builds on and extends a well-established dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to incorporate carbon trading system and green certificate trading system into the modeling framework, simulating a diverse of system development pathways further allows an exploration of the many possible policy effect. Then, using total factor productivity as a comprehensive indicator to asses policy effectiveness, the evolutionary trend of comprehensive effects under different paths are separately evaluated to discover the reforms' optimal range. Our work offers main results: First, these instruments provide a price signal. The introduction of a carbon allowance auction drive up carbon prices, while the implementation of a green certificate punishment and the expansion of the trading scope promote an increase in green certificate prices. Second, all policy scenarios that help reduce carbon emission intensity and optimize the power supply structure. However, in achieving the net-zero goal, the green certificate policy incurs more economic costs than the carbon trading policy. Indeed, the combination of multiple policy tools alleviates the decline of social welfare levels. Third, synergism design among policy tools: the focus should be on carbon trading policy from 2021 to 2030, green certificate trading policy from 2030 to 2050, and strengthened policy from 2050 to 2060. Reform measures within policies may need to be introduced in a timely manner. This study offers specific insights and tailored policy proposals to support policymakers in balancing environmental goals with economic and social needs in light of the aforementioned findings.

摘要

虽然我们对国家碳排放交易系统和绿色证书交易系统的了解是强有力的激励工具,可以实现中国日益雄心勃勃的气候目标,但系统结构改革仍存在不确定性。本研究在一个成熟的动态可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型的基础上进行扩展,将碳交易系统和绿色证书交易系统纳入建模框架,模拟多种系统发展路径进一步探索了许多可能的政策效果。然后,使用全要素生产率作为综合指标来评估政策有效性,分别评估不同路径下综合效果的演变趋势,以发现改革的最优范围。我们的工作提供了主要结果:首先,这些工具提供了价格信号。引入碳配额拍卖会推高碳价,而实施绿色证书惩罚和扩大交易范围则会推动绿色证书价格上涨。其次,所有有助于降低碳排放强度和优化供电结构的政策情景。然而,在实现净零目标方面,绿色证书政策比碳交易政策带来更高的经济成本。事实上,多种政策工具的组合缓解了社会福利水平下降的问题。第三,政策工具之间的协同设计:重点应放在 2021 年至 2030 年的碳交易政策、2030 年至 2050 年的绿色证书交易政策以及 2050 年至 2060 年的强化政策上。政策内的改革措施可能需要及时推出。本研究根据上述发现,为政策制定者在平衡环境目标与经济和社会需求方面提供了具体的见解和针对性的政策建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验