• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最年长老年人的出行方式选择和新的移动技术接受度:以美国和中国为例。

Oldest old's travel mode choice and new mobility technology acceptance: case in America and China.

机构信息

Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1344854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344854. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344854
PMID:38765489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11100323/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The oldest olds (aged 85 and over) are the fastest-growing age segment. However, our understanding of their mobility is limited. To address this gap, we invited 19 U.S. and 30 Chinese "oldest old" to take part in focus groups and complete a mobility questionnaire. We focus on travel mode choice, which includes changes in travel modes, frequency of usage, and perceptions of comfort.

METHODS

Older adults' familiarity and acceptance of new mobility technologies (e.g., ridesharing, carsharing, and autonomous vehicles) were measured by questionnaire and focus group. Word clouds were also used to illustrate people's reasons for choosing their primary mode of transportation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results show that both panels of older adults similarly feel some extent of travel limitations. But the responses among the two groups differ: 18 American participants chose "drive myself" as their primary option a decade ago, while 11 chose it now; no Chinese participants selected it either a decade ago or now. Both currently and 10 years ago, there was a significant difference in mode choice between participants in China and the United States. However, this gap has narrowed over the past decade. Participants in China have significantly changed their transportation preferences compared to 10 years ago, while participants in the US have remained nearly unchanged. American respondents consider "ease" as an important factor, while Chinese respondents pay more attention to "safety" and "no other option to get around" when making travel mode choices. Compared to Chinese participants, American participants were more comfortable with driving an autonomous vehicle. These differences may result from the various developmental stages and transportation policies of the two countries. This study supports the development of new mobility technologies for the oldest old to improve their quality of life.

摘要

简介

最年长的老年人(85 岁及以上)是增长最快的年龄群体。然而,我们对他们的流动性的理解是有限的。为了解决这一差距,我们邀请了 19 名美国和 30 名中国的“最年长的老年人”参加焦点小组并完成了一份流动性问卷。我们专注于出行模式选择,包括出行模式的变化、使用频率以及对舒适度的看法。

方法

通过问卷和焦点小组,测量了老年人对新的出行技术(如拼车、汽车共享和自动驾驶汽车)的熟悉程度和接受程度。还使用词云图来说明人们选择主要交通方式的原因。

结果与讨论

结果表明,两组老年人都在某种程度上感受到了出行限制。但两组的反应有所不同:18 名美国参与者 10 年前选择“自己开车”作为主要出行方式,而现在有 11 人选择了这种方式;10 年前和现在都没有中国参与者选择这种方式。目前和 10 年前,中国和美国的参与者在出行模式选择上存在显著差异。然而,这一差距在过去十年中有所缩小。与 10 年前相比,中国参与者的交通偏好发生了显著变化,而美国参与者几乎没有变化。美国受访者认为“便利”是一个重要因素,而中国受访者在做出出行模式选择时更关注“安全”和“没有其他出行方式”。与中国参与者相比,美国参与者对自动驾驶汽车的接受程度更高。这些差异可能是由于两国不同的发展阶段和交通政策所致。本研究支持为最年长的老年人开发新的出行技术,以提高他们的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/94943070d279/fpubh-12-1344854-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/19db5188f85d/fpubh-12-1344854-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/53b282a27649/fpubh-12-1344854-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/94943070d279/fpubh-12-1344854-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/19db5188f85d/fpubh-12-1344854-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/53b282a27649/fpubh-12-1344854-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/11100323/94943070d279/fpubh-12-1344854-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Oldest old's travel mode choice and new mobility technology acceptance: case in America and China.最年长老年人的出行方式选择和新的移动技术接受度:以美国和中国为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1344854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344854. eCollection 2024.
2
Driver License Renewal Laws and Older Adults' Daily Driving, United States, 2003-2017.驾驶人驾照更新法律与美国老年人日常驾驶,2003-2017 年。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2268-2277. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa070.
3
A cross-sectional study of travel patterns of older adults in the USA during 2015: implications for mobility and traffic safety.2015年美国老年人出行模式的横断面研究:对出行能力和交通安全的影响
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e015780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015780.
4
Travel-related behaviors, opinions, and concerns of U.S. adult drivers by race/ethnicity, 2010.2010 年美国成年司机的出行相关行为、意见和顾虑按种族/民族划分
J Safety Res. 2013 Dec;47:93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
Do Socio-Economic Characteristics Affect Travel Behavior? A Comparative Study of Low-Carbon and Non-Low-Carbon Shopping Travel in Shenyang City, China.社会经济特征是否会影响出行行为?沈阳市低碳与非低碳购物出行的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 27;15(7):1346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071346.
6
Preferred modes of travel among older adults: what factors affect the choice to walk instead of drive?老年人偏爱的出行方式:哪些因素会影响选择步行而非开车?
J Safety Res. 2009 Oct;40(5):395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
7
Individuals' Acceptance to Free-Floating Electric Carsharing Mode: A Web-Based Survey in China.个人对自由浮动式电动汽车共享模式的接受度:一项在中国开展的基于网络的调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 2;14(5):476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050476.
8
Evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on the older adults' travel mode choices.评估新冠疫情对老年人出行方式选择的影响。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Oct;112:162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Health lifestyles and Chinese oldest-old's subjective well-being-evidence from a latent class analysis.健康生活方式与中国高龄老人的主观幸福感——基于潜在类别分析的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02121-0.
10
Perceptions of safety during everyday travel shaping older adults' mobility in Bengaluru, India.在印度班加罗尔,日常出行安全感知塑造了老年人的出行方式。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):1940. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19455-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Vehicles for People With Dementia: A "Tremendous Potential" That "Has Ways to go"-Reports of a Qualitative Study.用于痴呆症患者的自动驾驶车辆:具有“巨大潜力”的研究报告——定性研究。
Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):140-154. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac115.
2
Brief Report: The Unrealized Potential of Autonomous Vehicles for an Aging Population.简要报告:自动驾驶汽车在老龄化人口中的未实现潜力。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(5):486-496. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1500860. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Sharing is caring: The potential of the sharing economy to support aging in place.
分享即关爱:共享经济支持就地养老的潜力。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2020 Oct-Dec;41(4):407-429. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2018.1428575. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Driving Cessation Anno 2010: Which Older Drivers Give Up Their License and Why? Evidence From Denmark.2010年的驾驶终止:哪些老年驾驶者放弃了驾照以及原因何在?来自丹麦的证据。
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Jan;35(1):18-38. doi: 10.1177/0733464814521690. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
5
Road traffic accidents and the elderly.道路交通事故与老年人。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009 Sep;9(3):290-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00535.x.
6
Transportation and aging: a research agenda for advancing safe mobility.交通与老龄化:推进安全出行的研究议程。
Gerontologist. 2007 Oct;47(5):578-90. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.5.578.
7
The 2001 National Household Travel Survey: a look into the travel patterns of older Americans.2001年全国家庭旅行调查:探究美国老年人的旅行模式。
J Safety Res. 2003;34(4):461-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.10.001.
8
Ability, disability, and the oldest old.能力、残疾与高龄老人。
J Aging Soc Policy. 1997;9(1):13-31. doi: 10.1300/J031v09n01_03.