• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自我监督机器学习的 UK Biobank 腕部加速度计计步特征分析

Self-Supervised Machine Learning to Characterize Step Counts from Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in the UK Biobank.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM.

SwissRe Institute, UNITED KINGDOM.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Oct 1;56(10):1945-1953. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478. Epub 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478
PMID:38768076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402590/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Step count is an intuitive measure of physical activity frequently quantified in health-related studies; however, accurate step counting is difficult in the free-living environment, with error routinely above 20% in wrist-worn devices against camera-annotated ground truth. This study aimed to describe the development and validation of step count derived from a wrist-worn accelerometer and assess its association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort.

METHODS

We developed and externally validated a self-supervised machine learning step detection model, trained on an open-source and step-annotated free-living dataset. Thirty-nine individuals will free-living ground-truth annotated step counts were used for model development. An open-source dataset with 30 individuals was used for external validation. Epidemiological analysis was performed using 75,263 UK Biobank participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer. Cox regression was used to test the association of daily step count with fatal CVD and all-cause mortality after adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The algorithm substantially outperformed reference models (free-living mean absolute percent error of 12.5% vs 65%-231%). Our data indicate an inverse dose-response association, where taking 6430-8277 daily steps was associated with 37% (25%-48%) and 28% (20%-35%) lower risk of fatal CVD and all-cause mortality up to 7 yr later, compared with those taking fewer steps each day.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an open and transparent method that markedly improves the measurement of steps in large-scale wrist-worn accelerometer datasets. The application of this method demonstrated expected associations with CVD and all-cause mortality, indicating excellent face validity. This reinforces public health messaging for increasing physical activity and can help lay the groundwork for the inclusion of target step counts in future public health guidelines.

摘要

目的

步数是衡量身体活动的直观指标,在与健康相关的研究中经常被量化;然而,在自由生活环境中,准确的计步非常困难,腕戴设备的误差通常比摄像机标记的地面真实值高出 20%以上。本研究旨在描述一种腕戴加速度计计步的开发和验证,并评估其与心血管疾病和全因死亡率的相关性,该研究基于一个大型前瞻性队列。

方法

我们开发并外部验证了一种基于机器学习的自我监督步频检测模型,该模型是在一个开源的、带步频注释的自由生活数据集上训练的。使用 39 名个体的自由生活地面真实注释步数来开发模型。使用一个包含 30 名个体的开源数据集进行外部验证。使用没有患心血管疾病(CVD)或癌症的 75263 名英国生物库参与者进行流行病学分析。使用 Cox 回归来测试每天步数与致命 CVD 和全因死亡率之间的关联,调整了潜在的混杂因素。

结果

该算法大大优于参考模型(自由生活的平均绝对百分比误差为 12.5%,而 65%-231%)。我们的数据表明存在一种剂量反应反比关系,每天走 6430-8277 步与致命 CVD 和全因死亡率的风险降低 37%(25%-48%)和 28%(20%-35%)相关,与每天走较少步数的人相比,这一风险在 7 年以后仍然存在。

结论

我们开发了一种开放和透明的方法,极大地提高了大规模腕戴加速度计数据集的步数测量精度。该方法的应用显示了与 CVD 和全因死亡率的预期关联,表明其具有极好的表面有效性。这强化了增加身体活动的公共卫生信息,并为未来公共卫生指南中包含目标步数奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/b2293f523764/msse-56-1945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/80b15cb2bcfb/msse-56-1945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/9f3aef059bcd/msse-56-1945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/8560688d6275/msse-56-1945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/b2293f523764/msse-56-1945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/80b15cb2bcfb/msse-56-1945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/9f3aef059bcd/msse-56-1945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/8560688d6275/msse-56-1945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5592/11419277/b2293f523764/msse-56-1945-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Supervised Machine Learning to Characterize Step Counts from Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in the UK Biobank.基于自我监督机器学习的 UK Biobank 腕部加速度计计步特征分析
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Oct 1;56(10):1945-1953. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Wrist-worn Step Detection Algorithm with Deployment in the UK Biobank.一种用于英国生物银行的机器学习腕部步数检测算法的开发与验证
medRxiv. 2023 Feb 22:2023.02.20.23285750. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.20.23285750.
3
Association of accelerometer-derived physical activity with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with cardiovascular diseases: a prospective cohort study.心血管疾病患者中加速度计测量的身体活动与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 6;32(1):20-29. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae248.
4
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
5
Stepping towards More Intuitive Physical Activity Metrics with Wrist-Worn Accelerometry: Validity of an Open-Source Step-Count Algorithm.腕戴加速度计迈向更直观的体力活动指标:开源计步算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;22(24):9984. doi: 10.3390/s22249984.
6
Validation of open-source step-counting algorithms for wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometers in cardiovascular patients.腕戴三轴加速度计开源计步算法在心血管病患者中验证。
Gait Posture. 2022 Feb;92:206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.035. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
Dose-response of accelerometer-measured physical activity, step count, and cancer risk in the UK Biobank: a prospective cohort analysis.基于英国生物库的加速度计测量体力活动、步数与癌症风险的剂量-反应关系:一项前瞻性队列分析。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02147-5.
8
Comparison of Students' Physical Activity at Different Times and Establishment of a Regression Model for Smart Fitness Trackers.不同时段学生身体活动情况比较及智能健身追踪器回归模型的建立
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;25(6):1726. doi: 10.3390/s25061726.
9
Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults.比较年轻人佩戴在非优势手腕和腰部的 ActiGraph 加速度计的基于步幅的指标。
J Sports Sci. 2024 Sep;42(17):1664-1672. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2404784. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
10
Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.用于自由生活行为分类的髋部和腕部加速度计算法
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):933-40. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000840.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive performance of wearable sensors for mortality risk in older adults: a model development and validation study.可穿戴传感器对老年人死亡风险的预测性能:一项模型开发与验证研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 4:2025.04.03.25325101. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.03.25325101.
2
Continuous Assessment of Daily-Living Gait Using Self-Supervised Learning of Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data.利用腕部佩戴式加速度计数据的自监督学习对日常生活步态进行持续评估。
medRxiv. 2025 May 21:2025.05.21.25328061. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.21.25328061.
3
Amount and intensity of daily total physical activity, step count and risk of incident cancer in the UK Biobank.
英国生物银行中每日总体身体活动量、步数与癌症发病风险
Br J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 3;59(12):839-847. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-109360.
4
Comparing Step-Counting Algorithms for High-Resolution Wrist Accelerometry Data in Older Adults in the ARIC Study.在ARIC研究中比较老年人高分辨率腕部加速度计数据的计步算法
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 May 5;80(6). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf034.
5
CAPTURE-24: A large dataset of wrist-worn activity tracker data collected in the wild for human activity recognition.CAPTURE-24:一个大型的可穿戴活动追踪器数据集,在野外采集,用于人类活动识别。
Sci Data. 2024 Oct 16;11(1):1135. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03960-3.