• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

容忍腐败和描述性社会规范:对贪污的实验研究。

Tolerance for corruption and descriptive social norm: An experimental study of embezzlement.

机构信息

China Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303558. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303558
PMID:38768247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11104634/
Abstract

Public tolerance for corruption within a society significantly influences the prevalence of corrupt practices, but less is known about how this tolerance evolves with social norms. This paper presents experimental evidences demonstrating that the descriptive social norm indicating widespread corruption can lead to increased tolerance for corruptive acts. We introduce an asymmetric information ultimatum game to simulate the interactions between embezzlers and citizens. Game theoretical analysis reveals that victims anticipating corruption will exhibit greater compliance with embezzlement when the offers are evaluated based on descriptive norms. To test the hypothesis, we employ a framing effect to induce variations in descriptive norms within a behavioral experiment. Although the treatment effect is significant only in the subgroup of student cadres, this subgroup demonstrated increased beliefs about embezzlement, greater tolerance for corruption, and a heightened propensity to embezzle when exposed to framings with hierarchical implications. This paper contributes to the corruption literature by examining the effects of descriptive norms on victims' responses to embezzlement. It offers a more comprehensive perspective on how social standards shape public opinions and corrupt actions, enhancing our understanding of the self-reinforcing nature of corruption.

摘要

公众对社会腐败现象的容忍度会显著影响腐败行为的盛行程度,但对于这种容忍度如何随着社会规范的变化而变化,我们知之甚少。本文通过实验证据表明,描述性社会规范表明普遍存在腐败现象会导致人们对腐败行为的容忍度增加。我们引入了一个非对称信息最后通牒博弈来模拟贪污者和公民之间的相互作用。博弈论分析表明,当根据描述性规范评估时,预期会发生腐败的受害者在面对贪污行为时会表现出更大的顺从性。为了检验这一假设,我们在行为实验中采用了框架效应来引起描述性规范的变化。虽然处理效应仅在学生干部这一亚组中显著,但当接触到具有等级含义的框架时,这个亚组表现出了对贪污行为更高的认知度、对腐败行为的更高容忍度以及更高的贪污倾向。本文通过考察描述性规范对受害者对贪污行为反应的影响,为腐败文献做出了贡献。它提供了一个更全面的视角,说明社会规范如何塑造公众意见和腐败行为,增强了我们对腐败自我强化本质的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db3/11104634/79b71d3a9687/pone.0303558.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db3/11104634/03d21c28d031/pone.0303558.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db3/11104634/79b71d3a9687/pone.0303558.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db3/11104634/03d21c28d031/pone.0303558.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0db3/11104634/79b71d3a9687/pone.0303558.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Tolerance for corruption and descriptive social norm: An experimental study of embezzlement.容忍腐败和描述性社会规范:对贪污的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303558. eCollection 2024.
2
"Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.“谁不这样呢?”——描述性规范对腐败的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131830. eCollection 2015.
3
The Road to Bribery and Corruption.走向贪污腐败之路。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682026. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
4
Corruption and the Other(s): Scope of Superordinate Identity Matters for Corruption Permissibility.腐败与他者:上级身份范围对腐败可容许性的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144542. eCollection 2015.
5
Effects of perceived descriptive norms on corrupt intention: The mediating role of moral disengagement.感知到的描述性规范对腐败意图的影响:道德推脱的中介作用。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):93-101. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12401. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
Promoting anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in the recruitment and promotion of health workers to safeguard health outcomes.在卫生工作者的招聘和晋升中促进反腐败、透明度和问责制,以保障卫生成果。
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup1):1701326. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1701326.
7
Corruption and strengthening anti-corruption efforts in healthcare during the pandemic of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间医疗卫生领域的腐败与反腐努力
Med Leg J. 2021 Mar;89(1):25-28. doi: 10.1177/0025817220971925. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Evolution of egalitarian social norm by resource management.资源管理导致平等主义社会规范的演变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0227902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227902. eCollection 2020.
9
Evolution of cooperation in a hierarchical society with corruption control.具有腐败控制的分层社会中的合作演变。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Jul 14;449:60-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
10
Predicting social tipping and norm change in controlled experiments.预测控制实验中的社会临界点和规范变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014893118.

本文引用的文献

1
Norm, gender, and bribe-giving: Insights from a behavioral game.规范、性别与行贿:行为博弈的见解
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0189995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189995. eCollection 2017.
2
Effects of perceived descriptive norms on corrupt intention: The mediating role of moral disengagement.感知到的描述性规范对腐败意图的影响:道德推脱的中介作用。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):93-101. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12401. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
"Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.“谁不这样呢?”——描述性规范对腐败的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131830. eCollection 2015.
4
Power hierarchies and social status: on the normative significance of social epidemiology.权力等级制度与社会地位:论社会流行病学的规范意义。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(3):52-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.998378.