Associate Professor, Department of History, Ewha Womans University.
Uisahak. 2024 Apr;33(1):135-189. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.135.
During the Song period, abscesses were a disease that could affect anyone regardless of their class. This study examines how people at that time explained the cause of abscesses and their efforts to treat them, focusing on the experiences of those who suffered from abscesses and their families. Previous research on disease history during the Song period primarily focused on ailments like colds and infectious diseases , or plagues prevalent in the southern regions of China. On the other hand, examining abscesses as a common everyday illness that could affect anyone and considering them from the perspective of patients' experiences has remained unexplored in previous studies. To reconstruct the experiences of Song period patients, this study analyzes over sixty anecdotes related to abscesses found in Yi Jian Zhi written by Hong Mai. These cases span across the mid to late 12th century, with a majority of the patients being from the literati () class or connected to the literati. These anecdotes exhibit two distinct trends. One focuses on narratives surrounding the onset of abscesses, attributing their cause primarily to the patients' lifestyle. When the cause of the abscesses was unknown, people metaphorically attributed its onset to perceived blasphemy against God, an act of killing, negligence in duties, or other wrongdoings. This trend is evident among the literati class in particular, where abscesses were often linked to factors such as excessive legal executions or exploitation, and even acts of killing people. Except for those cases, in explaining the cause of abscesses in commoners, there were instances caused by a pediculus infestation, while in case of literati, Dansha () poisoning was a common cause. It is interesting to note that the narrative tradition, prevalent in official history biographies, which attributes the onset of abscesses to worries and resentment, was not evident in written records such as Yi Jian Zhi. Furthermore, the detailed description of external similarities, portraying abscesses as traces of punishment from the underground realm, is a narrative characteristic that solidified such stereotypical perceptions. The literati's notion that they should alert people through these related anecdotes contributed to the spread of this perception. Another trend in these anecdotes was centered around narratives of abscess treatment, where the focus shifted primarily to seeking "doctors," unlike the metaphorical explanations of abscess onset causes and processes. When afflicted with abscesses, people generally sought out those renowned surgeons, known as Yang-yi , and those famous for treating abscesses. In local communities, individuals who had "received the divine secrets of abscesses," those possessing their own mysterious abscesses cures, and those famous for generations for treating abscesses by using stone acupuncture were active. Such information about them was shared within the local societies. Their treatment predominantly consisted of surgical procedures to lance abscesses and drain pus, which often led patients to endure significant pain during the treatment process. In many cases, such patients sought treatment from well-known local surgeons and abscess specialists who surgically treated them. The literati, who are said to have influenced the development of pulse-centered medical and academic medicine in China, also sought out surgeons for abscess treatment. Medical formularies compiled by the court as well as privately published ones rarely mentioned surgical methods utilizing tools. The fact that surgical techniques were utilized in local regions at that time indicates a disparity between the official medical practices documented in texts and the practical methods employed in local communities. An analysis of approximately sixty anecdotes related to abscesses shows that abscesses were characterized by unknown causes and excruciating pain. Their onset was often attributed to the patient's lifestyle and wrongdoings, and they were also perceived as punishment for one's wrongdoings. However, as it was a disease where treatment effects could be relatively easily observed through surgical procedures, there was a proactive utilization of the locally formed treatment environment, preferring surgical interventions over relying on religious powers. Contrary to the medical trends and methods outlined in medical literature, surgical treatments were prevalent as the chosen method of treatment among the population in local communities. It appears that the realities experienced, reasoned, and shared by people in the Song period regarding the perception and response to abscesses did not necessarily align with those of mainstream medical practices. Moreover, despite attributing the onset of abscesses to one's wrongdoing, there was a preference for seeking surgeons or Yang-yi over religious methods in their treatment, reflecting a characteristic of the local medical culture surrounding abscesses during the Song period.
在宋代,脓肿是一种可能影响任何人的疾病,无论其社会阶层如何。本研究考察了当时人们如何解释脓肿的病因以及他们努力治疗脓肿的情况,重点关注脓肿患者及其家人的经历。之前对宋代疾病史的研究主要集中在感冒和传染病等疾病,或者中国南方流行的瘟疫。另一方面,将脓肿作为一种可能影响任何人的常见日常疾病,并从患者的角度考虑,在之前的研究中尚未得到探讨。为了重建宋代患者的经历,本研究分析了洪迈的《夷坚志》中收录的六十多个脓肿相关轶事。这些病例跨越了 12 世纪中期到晚期,大多数患者来自文人阶层或与文人有关。这些轶事表现出两种截然不同的趋势。一种趋势侧重于脓肿发作的叙述,主要将其病因归因于患者的生活方式。当脓肿的病因未知时,人们会将其发作隐喻为对上帝的亵渎、杀人行为、失职或其他不当行为。这种趋势在文人阶层中尤为明显,其中脓肿常常与过度执行法律、剥削甚至杀人等因素有关。除了这些情况之外,在解释平民脓肿的病因时,有时是由于虱子滋生,而在文人阶层中,砷中毒是常见的病因。有趣的是,在官方历史传记中普遍存在的将脓肿发作归因于忧虑和怨恨的叙述传统,在《夷坚志》等书面记录中并不明显。此外,详细描述脓肿作为来自地下世界的惩罚痕迹的外部相似性,是一种强化这种刻板印象的叙述特征。文人认为他们应该通过这些相关轶事提醒人们,这有助于传播这种观念。另一种趋势是脓肿治疗的叙述,重点主要放在寻找“医生”上,而不是隐喻脓肿发作的原因和过程。脓肿发作时,人们通常会寻求那些著名的外科医生,如疡医,以及那些以治疗脓肿闻名的医生。在当地社区,那些“得到脓肿秘密”的人,那些拥有自己神秘脓肿治疗方法的人,以及那些以石针治疗脓肿而闻名的世世代代的人,都很活跃。关于他们的信息在当地社会中共享。他们的治疗主要包括切开脓肿和引流脓液的外科手术,这往往使患者在治疗过程中承受巨大的疼痛。在许多情况下,这些患者会寻求当地著名的外科医生和脓肿专家进行治疗,这些医生会进行手术治疗。据说文人阶层对中国以脉象为中心的医学和学术医学的发展产生了影响,他们也会寻求外科医生来治疗脓肿。宫廷编纂的方剂和私人出版的方剂很少提到利用工具的外科方法。当时在当地地区使用外科技术表明,官方医学实践记录在文本中与当地社区实际采用的方法之间存在差异。对大约六十个脓肿相关轶事的分析表明,脓肿的特点是病因不明且疼痛剧烈。它们的发作通常归因于患者的生活方式和不当行为,也被视为对患者不当行为的惩罚。然而,由于脓肿是一种治疗效果可以通过外科手术相对容易观察到的疾病,因此人们积极利用当地形成的治疗环境,倾向于外科干预,而不是依赖宗教力量。与医学文献中概述的医学趋势和方法相反,外科治疗在当地社区的人群中是一种流行的治疗方法。这表明,宋代人们对脓肿的看法和反应的现实情况,并不一定与主流医学实践一致。此外,尽管脓肿的发作归因于人们的不当行为,但在治疗脓肿时,人们更倾向于寻求外科医生或疡医,而不是宗教方法,反映了宋代脓肿当地医学文化的一个特征。