Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
EXCEL Excellent Clinician Scientist Program, Else Kroener Research Schools for Physicians, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2446-2453. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07275-5. Epub 2024 May 20.
With a rising number of bariatric procedures, the absolute number of postoperative complications is increasing, too. Postoperative bleeding, particularly along the staple line, is a recognized challenge. Numerous strategies including reinforcement of the staple line (SLR) have been proposed to improve bleeding rates, but no single technique has shown superiority over the others. In our bariatric center, we have implemented intraoperative blood pressure regulation alone, without SLR, to reduce hemorrhagic complications postoperatively.
This retrospective observational analysis compares the incidence of postoperative bleeding in two groups of consecutive patients (total n = 438 patients), one with and one without intraoperative blood pressure elevation to 150 mmHg systolic without the additional use of staple line reinforcement. This intervention was integrated into our standard bariatric surgical procedure, no randomization or matching was conducted. Significant postoperative bleeding was defined as drop of hemoglobin of more than 2.5 mg/dl in 48 h and one of the following symptoms: lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L, bloody drainage, quantity of drainage more than 200 ml and/or radiological signs.
Defined postoperative bleeding occurred in 33 (7.5%) patients. We observed a decrease in bleeding rates from 10% to 5% (n = 22 vs. n = 11) after introducing intraoperative blood pressure increase (p = 0.034). The rate of revisional surgery for bleeding also decreased from 2.7% to 0.5% (n = 6 vs. n = 1). In multivariate analysis, the intervention with blood pressure elevation showed a significant decrease on bleeding rates (p = 0.038).
The use of increased intraoperative blood pressure alone, without staple line reinforcement, appears to be an effective and suitable method for reducing post-bariatric hemorrhagic complications.
随着减重手术数量的增加,术后并发症的绝对数量也在增加。术后出血,特别是沿着吻合线,是一个公认的挑战。已经提出了许多策略,包括加强吻合线(SLR),以提高出血率,但没有一种单一的技术比其他技术更具优势。在我们的减重中心,我们单独实施术中血压调节,而不进行 SLR,以减少术后出血并发症。
本回顾性观察分析比较了两组连续患者(共 438 例患者)术后出血的发生率,一组患者术中血压升高至 150mmHg 收缩压,不使用额外的吻合线加强,另一组患者不进行术中血压升高。这一干预措施被纳入我们的标准减重手术程序中,没有进行随机化或匹配。术后出血定义为血红蛋白在 48 小时内下降超过 2.5mg/dl,以及以下症状之一:乳酸盐≥2mmol/L、血性引流、引流量超过 200ml 和/或影像学征象。
定义为术后出血的患者有 33 例(7.5%)。我们观察到,引入术中血压升高后,出血率从 10%下降到 5%(n=22 例比 n=11 例)(p=0.034)。因出血而再次手术的比例也从 2.7%下降到 0.5%(n=6 例比 n=1 例)。多变量分析显示,血压升高的干预措施显著降低了出血率(p=0.038)。
单独使用术中血压升高,不进行吻合线加强,似乎是一种有效且合适的方法,可以减少减重手术后出血并发症。