• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖症手术患者术中漏诊测试后的 30 天结果。

30-Day Outcomes After Intraoperative Leak Testing for Bariatric Surgery Patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.047
PMID:31077945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6679992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative testing of anastomoses and staples lines is commonly performed to minimize the risk of postoperative leaks in bariatric surgery, but its impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the association between leak testing and 30-d postoperative leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study utilizing 2015-2016 data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Postoperative outcomes were compared using χ test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-d outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 237,081 patients. Leak testing was performed on 73.0% and 92.1% of LSG and RYGB patients, respectively. LSG was associated with lower rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission than RYGB. On multivariable analysis, intraoperative leak testing was associated with increased rates of postoperative leak for LSG and RYGB (OR 1.48 and 1.90, respectively) and lower rates of bleed for LSG (OR 0.76). There were no significant associations between leak testing and rates of reoperation or readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of intraoperative leak testing was not associated with improved outcomes for either LSG or RYGB. A prospective trial investigating leak testing is warranted to better elucidate its impact.

摘要

背景

术中对吻合口和订书钉线进行测试,通常用于最大限度地降低减重手术术后漏的风险,但其影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)患者术中漏检与 30 天术后漏、出血、再次手术和再入院率之间的关系。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,利用 2015-2016 年代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划数据库的数据。使用 χ2 检验比较术后结果。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与 30 天结果相关的因素。

结果

我们纳入了 237081 例患者。LSG 和 RYGB 患者分别有 73.0%和 92.1%进行了漏检。LSG 的漏、出血、再次手术和再入院率均低于 RYGB。多变量分析显示,术中漏检与 LSG 和 RYGB 的术后漏检率增加相关(OR 分别为 1.48 和 1.90),与 LSG 的出血率降低相关(OR 为 0.76)。漏检与再次手术或再入院率之间无显著相关性。

结论

术中漏检与 LSG 或 RYGB 的结果改善无关。需要进行前瞻性试验来更好地阐明其影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/7aca2560629a/nihms-1527145-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/dc012df9f7f9/nihms-1527145-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/6b649225d94d/nihms-1527145-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/aaafa3cca743/nihms-1527145-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/5d1e58bf9f97/nihms-1527145-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/7aca2560629a/nihms-1527145-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/dc012df9f7f9/nihms-1527145-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/6b649225d94d/nihms-1527145-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/aaafa3cca743/nihms-1527145-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/5d1e58bf9f97/nihms-1527145-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae8/6679992/7aca2560629a/nihms-1527145-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
30-Day Outcomes After Intraoperative Leak Testing for Bariatric Surgery Patients.肥胖症手术患者术中漏诊测试后的 30 天结果。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.047. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.2015-2016 年 MBSAQIP 数据 PUF 分析:缝线加固在原发性腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果中的当前作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Effects of intraoperative leak testing on postoperative leak-related outcomes after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.初次减重手术后术中漏诊测试对术后与漏诊相关结局的影响:MBSAQIP 数据库分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Sep;15(9):1530-1540. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
The Impact of Staple Line Reinforcement Utilization on Bleeding and Leak Rates Following Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Obesity: a Propensity and Case-Control Matched Analysis.吻合器缝线加固在重度肥胖患者袖状胃切除术后对出血和渗漏发生率的影响:一项倾向评分及病例对照匹配分析
Obes Surg. 2019 Aug;29(8):2449-2463. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03883-8.
5
A Narrative of Intraoperative Staple Line Leaks and Bleeds During Bariatric Surgery.减重手术中吻合器钉合线渗漏与出血的病例报告
Obes Surg. 2016 Jul;26(7):1601-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2177-1.
6
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
7
Intraoperative leak test is associated with lower postoperative bleed rate in primary sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity matched analysis of primary and revision bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database.术中渗漏试验与初次袖状胃切除术后较低的出血率相关:一项使用MBSAQIP数据库对初次和翻修减重手术进行倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.基于代谢与减重外科认证和质量改进计划数据库的袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 30 天结果:首次报告。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
9
Predictors and outcomes of leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后漏的预测因素和结果:MBSAQIP 数据登记分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Mar;15(3):396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
10
Perioperative Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.糖尿病患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的围手术期结局:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库分析。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04175-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' perceptions of bariatric surgery in the Deep South: the impact of health literacy.美国最南部地区患者对减肥手术的看法:健康素养的影响
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11916-w.
2
Real-Time Perfusion and Leak Assessment in Bariatric Surgery: Bridging Traditional and Advanced Techniques.肥胖症手术中的实时灌注与渗漏评估:连接传统技术与先进技术
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71919. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71919. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Nonoperative Management Strategies for Anastomotic Leaks After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly patients - analysis of the MBSAQIP.老年人腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的安全性 - MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Sep;14(9):1276-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak after Bariatric Surgery: MBASQIP Analysis.减重手术后胃肠道漏的危险因素:MBASQIP 分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jul;227(1):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry.
单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)后吻合口漏的非手术治疗策略:文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 19;16(9):e69708. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69708. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Comparison of the postoperative outcome with and without intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 469 588 cases.对比袖状胃切除术术中漏诊测试与非漏诊测试的术后结果:469588 例病例的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1196-1205. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000919.
5
Bariatric Surgery Trends in the U.S.: 1% is the Loneliest Number.美国减肥手术趋势:1%是最孤独的数字。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):210-211. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003714.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术比腹腔镜胃旁路术更安全吗?利用 MBSAQIP 数据登记系统比较 30 天并发症。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Mar;14(3):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Predictors of Reoperation and Failure to Rescue in Bariatric Surgery.肥胖症手术再次手术及抢救失败的预测因素
JSLS. 2018 Jan-Mar;22(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00074.
5
The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults.减重手术与减肥:腹腔镜可调节胃束带术、腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在成人减肥中长期和极长期效果的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4331-4345. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5505-1. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Readmission Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后再入院
JSLS. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00064.
7
Routine intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy: is the leak test full of hot air?袖状胃切除术的常规术中渗漏检测:渗漏检测只是空谈吗?
Am J Surg. 2016 May;211(5):943-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management.美国代谢与减重外科学会关于胃旁路手术和袖状胃切除术后胃肠道漏的预防、检测和治疗的立场声明,包括影像学、手术探查和非手术管理的作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Technical factors associated with anastomotic leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后与吻合口漏相关的技术因素。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.036. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
10
Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management.袖状胃切除术后胃漏:预防与处理综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13904-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13904.