Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 20;14(1):11504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62440-1.
Pressure drifting is a troublesome error in invasive coronary function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between prolonged and short-time pressure equalizations in pressure drifting. Pressure drifting was defined as the pressure gradient between the mean pressure of the distal wire sensor (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) when the wire was withdrawn to the tip of the guiding catheter. Significant drifts 1 and 2 were defined as the absolute values of pressure gradients > 2 and > 3 mmHg, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between prolonged pressure equalization and each pressure drifting. The prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of drift 1 than the short-time pressure equalization strategy (6.84% vs. 16.92%, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were found in the incidence of drift 2 between the prolonged and short-time pressure equalization strategies (4.27% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.34). In the multivariable regression model, only the prolonged pressure equalization strategy predicted a lower incidence of pressure drift 1. In conclusion, the prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of significant pressure drifting with more stringent thresholds than the short-time pressure equalization strategy.
压力漂移是侵入性冠状动脉功能测试中的一个麻烦的错误。本研究旨在评估压力漂移中长时间和短时间压力平衡之间的关系。压力漂移定义为当导丝被拉回到引导导管的尖端时,远端线传感器(Pd)的平均压力和主动脉压(Pa)之间的压力梯度。显著漂移 1 和 2 分别定义为压力梯度的绝对值> 2 和 > 3 mmHg。使用逻辑回归模型评估长时间和短时间压力平衡与每种压力漂移之间的关系。与短时间压力平衡策略相比,长时间压力平衡策略与较低的漂移 1 发生率相关(6.84% vs. 16.92%,p < 0.05)。然而,在漂移 2 的发生率方面,长时间和短时间压力平衡策略之间没有统计学差异(4.27% vs. 7.69%,p = 0.34)。在多变量回归模型中,只有长时间压力平衡策略预测了较低的压力漂移 1 发生率。总之,与短时间压力平衡策略相比,长时间压力平衡策略与更严格的阈值下显著压力漂移的发生率较低相关。