• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关爱中的价值:支持性护理对基于价值的肺癌服务的贡献——一项定性半结构式访谈研究。

Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.

机构信息

Academic Nursing Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14089. doi: 10.1111/hex.14089.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14089
PMID:38769867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11106590/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant advances in the management of lung cancer, patients continue to experience a high burden of unmet need impacting quality of life and outcomes of care. Achieving value-based health care, where investment is targeted to services that deliver optimal experience and outcomes of care relative to the cost of delivering that care, requires attention to what people value most in meeting their needs. To date there has been little attention to what matters most to patients with lung cancer (i.e., what they value) as a component of achieving value-based cancer care. This qualitative study was undertaken to investigate components of care valued by people with lung cancer in Australia.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 23 people with lung cancer. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy from two metropolitan tertiary public health services. Data collected included demographic characteristics and patient perspectives regarding their priority concerns and components of care identified as most valuable in meeting their needs. Demographic characteristics of participants were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically using Interpretive Description.

RESULTS

Data analysis generated three key themes: valued components of care; benefits of receiving valued care components and consequences of missed opportunities for care. The components of care valued by patients reflect the core dimensions of cancer supportive care, with particular emphasis on ongoing opportunities for consultation (screening for unmet needs) and provision of person-centred information. The facilitation of trust between patients and their treating team, as a consequence of having these valued components evident in their care, was identified as a key characteristic of value-based care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified valued components of care described by people with lung cancer. Importantly, the care components identified have been proven to improve access to and coordination of care, and demonstrate the importance of integrating supportive care into care provision to achieve value-based cancer care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study was informed by perspectives of lung cancer patients who participated in semistructured interviews. We acknowledge that this contribution does not meet the criteria for patient and public involvement in research as defined by Health Expectations, but this study forms part of a larger program of cancer supportive care work being undertaken by this team, where comprehensive consumer engagement and co-design approaches are embedded in our work.

摘要

简介

尽管在肺癌治疗方面取得了重大进展,但患者仍面临着大量未满足的需求,这影响了他们的生活质量和治疗效果。实现基于价值的医疗保健,即针对提供最佳治疗体验和效果的服务进行投资,同时考虑到提供这些服务的成本,这需要关注人们在满足需求方面最看重的是什么。迄今为止,对于肺癌患者(即他们重视的内容)在实现基于价值的癌症护理方面的重要性,关注甚少。本定性研究旨在调查澳大利亚肺癌患者所看重的护理内容。

方法

本定性研究采用半结构式访谈,对 23 名肺癌患者进行了访谈。参与者是通过两家大都市三级公立卫生服务机构的目的抽样策略招募的。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征以及患者对其优先关注事项和被认为最能满足其需求的护理内容的看法。参与者的人口统计学特征进行了描述性分析,使用解释性描述对定性数据进行了主题分析。

结果

数据分析生成了三个主要主题:有价值的护理内容;接受有价值的护理内容的好处;以及错失护理机会的后果。患者看重的护理内容反映了癌症支持性护理的核心维度,特别强调持续提供咨询机会(未满足需求的筛查)和提供以患者为中心的信息。患者与治疗团队之间信任的建立,是由于这些有价值的护理内容在治疗中得到体现,这被认为是基于价值的护理的一个关键特征。

结论

本研究确定了肺癌患者所描述的有价值的护理内容。重要的是,已证实这些确定的护理内容可改善对护理的获取和协调,并证明将支持性护理纳入护理提供中对于实现基于价值的癌症护理非常重要。

患者或公众贡献

本研究是基于参与半结构式访谈的肺癌患者的观点得出的。我们承认,这一贡献不符合《健康期望》定义的患者和公众参与研究的标准,但本研究是该团队正在进行的癌症支持性护理工作的更大计划的一部分,其中综合的消费者参与和共同设计方法被嵌入我们的工作中。

相似文献

1
Value in care: The contribution of supportive care to value-based lung cancer services-A qualitative semistructured interview study.关爱中的价值:支持性护理对基于价值的肺癌服务的贡献——一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14089. doi: 10.1111/hex.14089.
2
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Exploring Consumer Experiences of Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Rehabilitation That Meets Their Needs: The Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 2-Consumer Perspectives.探索消费者在获取符合其需求的康复服务时遇到的障碍和促进因素的体验:康复选择研究,第 2 部分——消费者视角。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70035. doi: 10.1111/hex.70035.
5
Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study.深入了解妇科癌症患者的支持性护理需求:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 May;29(9-10):1684-1694. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15221. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Exploring the experiences and preferences of South Asian patients' of primary care in England since COVID-19.探索英格兰 COVID-19 以来的南亚初级保健患者的体验和偏好。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13982. doi: 10.1111/hex.13982.
8
Supportive care needs and preferences of lung cancer patients: a semi-structured qualitative interview study.肺癌患者的支持性护理需求与偏好:一项半结构化定性访谈研究
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1533-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2508-5. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: an inclusive and co-produced research study.消费者对患有慢性病和其他复杂需求人群的护理协调体验:一项包容性和共同制定的研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):472-484. doi: 10.1071/AH20108.
10
Creating safer cancer care with ethnic minority patients: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of cancer service staff.为少数民族癌症患者创造更安全的医疗服务:癌症服务人员的经验定性分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13979. doi: 10.1111/hex.13979.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives on Emotional Care: A Qualitative Study with Cancer Patients, Carers, and Health Professionals.情感关怀视角:一项针对癌症患者、护理人员及医疗专业人员的定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 4;11(4):452. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040452.
2
Refocusing cancer supportive care: a framework for integrated cancer care.重新聚焦癌症支持性照护:整合性癌症照护框架。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 14;31(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07501-9.
3
Social return on investment economic evaluation of supportive care for lung cancer patients in acute care settings in Australia.澳大利亚急性护理环境中支持性护理肺癌患者的社会投资回报经济评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):1399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08800-x.
4
Cost of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.肺癌的成本:一项系统评价。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Jan;33:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
How can we improve information for people affected by cancer? A national survey exploring gaps in current information provision, and challenges with accessing cancer information online.我们如何改善癌症患者的信息获取?一项全国性调查探索了当前信息提供方面的差距,以及在线获取癌症信息所面临的挑战。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2763-2770. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
6
Unmet supportive care needs associated with quality of life for people with lung cancer: A systematic review of the evidence 2007-2020.2007 年至 2020 年与肺癌患者生活质量相关的未满足支持性护理需求:系统评价证据。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13525. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13525. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
Patient and professional experiences of palliative care referral discussions from cancer services: A qualitative interview study.癌症服务中姑息治疗转诊讨论的患者和专业人员体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13340. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13340. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Health services costs for lung cancer care in Australia: Estimates from the 45 and Up Study.澳大利亚肺癌护理的健康服务成本:来自 45 岁及以上研究的估计。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238018. eCollection 2020.
9
Defining and Implementing Value-Based Health Care: A Strategic Framework.定义和实施基于价值的医疗保健:战略框架。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):682-685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122.
10
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 29 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数:1990 至 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.