Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia; and Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:
Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia. Emails:
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):472-484. doi: 10.1071/AH20108.
Objective The aim of this study was to explore consumer experiences of care coordination within Barwon Health's Hospital Admission Risk Program (HARP) located in Geelong, Victoria. Methods The study design was qualitative description informed by phenomenology and inclusive and co-production methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of six consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex needs. Participants were asked about their lived experience related to accessing the service, communication, and health and supports before and after accessing the service using an interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) experiencing authentic, values-based care; (2) collaborative care and working together; (3) gaining independence; (4) improved health and quality of life; and (5) limited understanding of HARP at the start. Overall, participants' experiences were positive, which related to improved health, quality of life, and sustainable supports. Although gains were experienced, most of the participants identified that their knowledge of HARP was limited when services commenced, which is an area for service improvement. Conclusion This research begins to address the knowledge gap related to consumer experiences of care coordination. Findings highlight the importance of providing person-centred, authentic and values-based care, listening authentically, and promoting consumer voice within services. The study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and further research is recommended into how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions, and improve consumer participation. What is known about the topic? Care coordination is multifaceted, with the primary purpose of facilitating person-centred care through appropriate and timely delivery of healthcare services. Despite the effectiveness of care coordination programs in preventing avoidable hospital admissions and reducing hospital length of stay, there is a paucity of research that has investigated consumer perspectives. There is also limited research that has adopted an inclusive research design of knowledge co-production where clinicians and consumers are included as equal members of the research team. What does this paper add? The study findings provide evidence into the value of care coordination from the perspective of consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex health and psychosocial issues. The findings also extend evidence into person- and consumer-centred care through understanding the qualities of care coordination practice that promote authenticity, integrity and positive health outcomes. Listening is identified as a critical element of authentic, values-based care, and as a care coordination intervention. Finally, the study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and a larger-scale Experience-Based Co-Design study is recommended to investigate how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions and improve consumer participation. What are the implications for practitioners? The study informs practitioners of consumer lived experience of care coordination. Practitioners are recommended to apply the findings to practice by adopting an authentic, values-based and person-centred care approach described in the study findings. Service improvement initiatives are recommended to focus on increasing awareness of care coordination services through consumer participation and the meaningful inclusion of consumer voice, which could focus on education for referring health and social care professionals.
目的 本研究旨在探讨维多利亚州吉隆的巴旺卫生署入院风险计划(HARP)中的消费者对护理协调的体验。
方法 研究设计是受现象学和包容性共同设计方法学启发的定性描述。对六位患有慢性疾病和其他复杂需求的消费者进行了有针对性的样本半结构式访谈。使用访谈指南,询问参与者在使用该服务前后与获取服务、沟通以及健康和支持相关的生活体验。对访谈进行录音并逐字转录,以便进行主题分析。
结果 确定了五个主题:(1)体验真实、基于价值观的护理;(2)协作护理和共同努力;(3)获得独立;(4)改善健康和生活质量;以及(5)开始时对 HARP 的理解有限。总体而言,参与者的体验是积极的,这与改善健康、生活质量和可持续支持有关。尽管取得了一些收益,但大多数参与者表示,在服务开始时,他们对 HARP 的了解有限,这是服务改进的一个领域。
结论 这项研究开始解决与护理协调的消费者体验相关的知识差距。研究结果强调了提供以患者为中心、真实和基于价值观的护理、真实倾听以及在服务中促进患者声音的重要性。该研究表明,在这种服务环境中,包容性共同设计研究是可行的,进一步的研究建议研究利益相关者如何理解护理协调服务的功能,以促进健康和预防医院再入院,并提高消费者的参与度。
主题方面已知内容? 护理协调具有多方面性,其主要目的是通过适当和及时地提供医疗保健服务来促进以患者为中心的护理。尽管护理协调计划在预防可避免的住院和缩短住院时间方面具有有效性,但关于消费者观点的研究却很少。还有有限的研究采用了包容性共同设计的知识共同生产设计,临床医生和消费者作为研究团队的平等成员。
本文增加了哪些内容? 该研究从患有慢性疾病和其他复杂健康和心理社会问题的消费者的角度提供了护理协调价值的证据。研究结果还通过了解促进真实性、完整性和积极健康结果的护理协调实践的质量,扩展了以人为本和以患者为中心的护理方面的证据。倾听被确定为真实、基于价值观的护理的关键要素,也是护理协调干预措施。最后,该研究表明,在这种服务环境中,包容性共同设计研究是可行的,建议进行更大规模的基于体验的共同设计研究,以调查利益相关者如何理解护理协调服务的功能,以促进健康和预防医院再入院并提高消费者的参与度。
对从业者有何影响? 该研究为从业者提供了消费者对护理协调的体验。建议从业者通过采用研究结果中描述的真实、基于价值观和以人为本的护理方法,将研究结果应用于实践。服务改进倡议建议通过消费者参与和有意义地纳入消费者的声音来提高对护理协调服务的认识,这可以侧重于对转介健康和社会护理专业人员的教育。