• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对患有慢性病和其他复杂需求人群的护理协调体验:一项包容性和共同制定的研究。

Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: an inclusive and co-produced research study.

机构信息

Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia; and Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:

Hospital Admission Risk Program, Barwon Health, Geelong, Vic., Australia. Emails:

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):472-484. doi: 10.1071/AH20108.

DOI:10.1071/AH20108
PMID:33588988
Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to explore consumer experiences of care coordination within Barwon Health's Hospital Admission Risk Program (HARP) located in Geelong, Victoria. Methods The study design was qualitative description informed by phenomenology and inclusive and co-production methodology. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of six consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex needs. Participants were asked about their lived experience related to accessing the service, communication, and health and supports before and after accessing the service using an interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) experiencing authentic, values-based care; (2) collaborative care and working together; (3) gaining independence; (4) improved health and quality of life; and (5) limited understanding of HARP at the start. Overall, participants' experiences were positive, which related to improved health, quality of life, and sustainable supports. Although gains were experienced, most of the participants identified that their knowledge of HARP was limited when services commenced, which is an area for service improvement. Conclusion This research begins to address the knowledge gap related to consumer experiences of care coordination. Findings highlight the importance of providing person-centred, authentic and values-based care, listening authentically, and promoting consumer voice within services. The study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and further research is recommended into how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions, and improve consumer participation. What is known about the topic? Care coordination is multifaceted, with the primary purpose of facilitating person-centred care through appropriate and timely delivery of healthcare services. Despite the effectiveness of care coordination programs in preventing avoidable hospital admissions and reducing hospital length of stay, there is a paucity of research that has investigated consumer perspectives. There is also limited research that has adopted an inclusive research design of knowledge co-production where clinicians and consumers are included as equal members of the research team. What does this paper add? The study findings provide evidence into the value of care coordination from the perspective of consumers living with chronic conditions and other complex health and psychosocial issues. The findings also extend evidence into person- and consumer-centred care through understanding the qualities of care coordination practice that promote authenticity, integrity and positive health outcomes. Listening is identified as a critical element of authentic, values-based care, and as a care coordination intervention. Finally, the study demonstrates that inclusive, co-design research is feasible in this service context, and a larger-scale Experience-Based Co-Design study is recommended to investigate how stakeholders understand the function of care coordination services to promote health and prevent hospital readmissions and improve consumer participation. What are the implications for practitioners? The study informs practitioners of consumer lived experience of care coordination. Practitioners are recommended to apply the findings to practice by adopting an authentic, values-based and person-centred care approach described in the study findings. Service improvement initiatives are recommended to focus on increasing awareness of care coordination services through consumer participation and the meaningful inclusion of consumer voice, which could focus on education for referring health and social care professionals.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨维多利亚州吉隆的巴旺卫生署入院风险计划(HARP)中的消费者对护理协调的体验。

方法 研究设计是受现象学和包容性共同设计方法学启发的定性描述。对六位患有慢性疾病和其他复杂需求的消费者进行了有针对性的样本半结构式访谈。使用访谈指南,询问参与者在使用该服务前后与获取服务、沟通以及健康和支持相关的生活体验。对访谈进行录音并逐字转录,以便进行主题分析。

结果 确定了五个主题:(1)体验真实、基于价值观的护理;(2)协作护理和共同努力;(3)获得独立;(4)改善健康和生活质量;以及(5)开始时对 HARP 的理解有限。总体而言,参与者的体验是积极的,这与改善健康、生活质量和可持续支持有关。尽管取得了一些收益,但大多数参与者表示,在服务开始时,他们对 HARP 的了解有限,这是服务改进的一个领域。

结论 这项研究开始解决与护理协调的消费者体验相关的知识差距。研究结果强调了提供以患者为中心、真实和基于价值观的护理、真实倾听以及在服务中促进患者声音的重要性。该研究表明,在这种服务环境中,包容性共同设计研究是可行的,进一步的研究建议研究利益相关者如何理解护理协调服务的功能,以促进健康和预防医院再入院,并提高消费者的参与度。

主题方面已知内容? 护理协调具有多方面性,其主要目的是通过适当和及时地提供医疗保健服务来促进以患者为中心的护理。尽管护理协调计划在预防可避免的住院和缩短住院时间方面具有有效性,但关于消费者观点的研究却很少。还有有限的研究采用了包容性共同设计的知识共同生产设计,临床医生和消费者作为研究团队的平等成员。

本文增加了哪些内容? 该研究从患有慢性疾病和其他复杂健康和心理社会问题的消费者的角度提供了护理协调价值的证据。研究结果还通过了解促进真实性、完整性和积极健康结果的护理协调实践的质量,扩展了以人为本和以患者为中心的护理方面的证据。倾听被确定为真实、基于价值观的护理的关键要素,也是护理协调干预措施。最后,该研究表明,在这种服务环境中,包容性共同设计研究是可行的,建议进行更大规模的基于体验的共同设计研究,以调查利益相关者如何理解护理协调服务的功能,以促进健康和预防医院再入院并提高消费者的参与度。

对从业者有何影响? 该研究为从业者提供了消费者对护理协调的体验。建议从业者通过采用研究结果中描述的真实、基于价值观和以人为本的护理方法,将研究结果应用于实践。服务改进倡议建议通过消费者参与和有意义地纳入消费者的声音来提高对护理协调服务的认识,这可以侧重于对转介健康和社会护理专业人员的教育。

相似文献

1
Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: an inclusive and co-produced research study.消费者对患有慢性病和其他复杂需求人群的护理协调体验:一项包容性和共同制定的研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):472-484. doi: 10.1071/AH20108.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
Care coordination for chronic and complex health conditions: An experienced based co-design study engaging consumer and clinician groups for service improvement.慢性病和复杂健康状况的护理协调:一项基于经验的共同设计研究,让消费者和临床医生群体参与服务改进。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224380. eCollection 2019.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
7
Health and social care needs of people living with dementia: a qualitative study of dementia support in the Victorian region of Gippsland, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州吉普斯兰地区痴呆症支持的定性研究:痴呆症患者的健康和社会护理需求。
Rural Remote Health. 2024 Jan;24(1):8244. doi: 10.22605/RRH8244. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
Managing chronic conditions care across primary care and hospital systems: lessons from an Australian Hospital Avoidance Risk Program using the Flinders Chronic Condition Management Program.跨初级保健和医院系统管理慢性病护理:来自澳大利亚使用弗林德斯慢性病管理计划的医院避免风险计划的经验教训。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Sep;42(5):542-549. doi: 10.1071/AH17099.
9
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
10
Consumer and carer perspectives in the development of a mental health research, treatment and teaching facility: A thematic analysis.消费者和护理人员对精神卫生研究、治疗及教学设施发展的看法:一项主题分析
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Sep;24(7):534-544. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12394. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review.共设计多病共存的照护:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 7;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03263-9.
2
Digital Health Secondary Prevention Using Co-Design Procedures: Focus Group Study With Health Care Providers and Patients With Myocardial Infarction.采用协同设计程序的数字健康二级预防:针对医疗保健提供者和心肌梗死患者的焦点小组研究
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Oct 30;7:e49892. doi: 10.2196/49892.
3
Residents' perspectives of mobile X-ray services in support of healthcare-in-place in residential aged care facilities: a qualitative study.
居民对支持养老机构就地医疗的移动 X 光服务的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03212-2.