Suppr超能文献

过去 25 年中物理治疗领域的多样性、公平性、包容性和反种族主义研究:范围综述。

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Antiracism Research in Physical Therapy Over the Last 25 Years: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, California State University East Bay, Hayward, California, USA.

Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2024 Oct 2;104(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae072.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Discussions of the root causes of health disparities and educational inequities often neglect to identify racism as a primary factor. Researchers must take a systems perspective to identify the effects of racism and other forms of systemic oppression on health. It is unclear to what extent this perspective exists in the physical therapy research literature. We conducted a scoping review to quantify and describe the volume of research in physical therapy pertaining to diversity, equity, and inclusion specifically examining race and/or ethnicity and references racism or antiracism.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases for articles published between 1997 and 2021 was conducted. Articles were screened to ensure they were focused exclusively or primarily on physical therapy and used diversity, equity, and inclusion terms in the context of personal identity factors. This resulted in 158 relevant articles. Each was tagged with an article type and personal identity factor focus.

RESULTS

A majority of the included articles were descriptive/observational in nature. The included articles explored various personal identity factors, with race and ethnicity being the most common focus followed by culture, disability, and socioeconomic status. A small proportion of articles explicitly discussed racism or antiracism.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need in physical therapy research for greater attention to racism as a fundamental cause of health disparities and educational inequities. Addressing this gap is crucial for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the field and ultimately achieving optimal health outcomes for marginalized populations.

IMPACT

Including consideration of racism and other forms of systemic oppression in the motivation, design, and interpretation of research in physical therapy will help to make more visible the root causes of inequity and improve our ability to develop effective, multi-level interventions.

摘要

目的

讨论健康差距和教育不平等的根本原因时,往往忽略了将种族主义视为主要因素。研究人员必须从系统的角度出发,确定种族主义和其他形式的系统性压迫对健康的影响。目前尚不清楚这种观点在物理治疗研究文献中存在的程度。我们进行了范围界定审查,以量化和描述与多样性、公平性和包容性相关的物理治疗研究量,特别是检查种族和/或族裔以及参考种族主义或反种族主义的研究。

方法

对 1997 年至 2021 年期间发表的 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库中的文章进行了系统搜索。对文章进行筛选,以确保其专门或主要关注物理治疗,并在个人身份因素的背景下使用多样性、公平性和包容性术语。这导致了 158 篇相关文章。每篇文章都标记了文章类型和个人身份因素重点。

结果

大多数纳入的文章性质上都是描述性/观察性的。纳入的文章探讨了各种个人身份因素,其中种族和族裔是最常见的关注点,其次是文化、残疾和社会经济地位。少数文章明确讨论了种族主义或反种族主义。

结论

这些发现强调了在物理治疗研究中需要更加关注种族主义,将其作为健康差距和教育不平等的根本原因。解决这一差距对于促进该领域的多样性、公平性和包容性以及最终为边缘化人群实现最佳健康结果至关重要。

影响

在物理治疗研究的动机、设计和解释中纳入对种族主义和其他形式的系统性压迫的考虑,将有助于更清楚地了解不平等的根本原因,并提高我们开发有效、多层次干预措施的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验