Ferrari Federico, Ismail Lamiese, Sabbagh Ahmad, Hardern Kieran, Owens Robert, Gozzini Elisa, Soleymani Majd Hooman
Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oncol Rev. 2024 May 7;18:1389035. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1389035. eCollection 2024.
Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with adjuvant radiotherapy but with potential significant morbidity. We aim to clarify whether there is high-quality evidence to support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this setting. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy to locoregional metastatic nodal areas. We conducted a comprehensive and systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Cancer Institute. We considered only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We identified 1,760 records and finally retrieved only one eligible RCT (114 participants with positive inguinofemoral lymph nodes). All women had undergone radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and had been randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy or to intraoperative ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. At 6 years, the overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 41% in favor of radiotherapy (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.30-1.3) without significance and with very low certainty of evidence. At 6 year, the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 29% versus 51% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.87). Recurrence-free survival at 6 years was 59% after adjuvant radiotherapy versus 48% after pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). Three (5.3%) versus 13 (24.1%) groin recurrences were noted, respectively, in the adjuvant radiotherapy and pelvic lymphadenectomy groups. There was no significant difference in acute toxicities for pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to radiotherapy. In women with positive pelvic lymph nodes (20%), the OS at 6 year was 36% compared with 13% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Late cutaneous toxicity rate appeared to be greater after radiotherapy (19% vs. 15%) but with less chronic lymphedema (16% vs. 22%). There is only very low-quality evidence on administering adjuvant radiotherapy for inguinal lymph node metastases. Although the identified study was a multicenter RCT, there was a reasonable imprecision and inconsistency because of small study numbers, wide confidence intervals in the data, and early trial closure, resulting in downgrading of the evidence.
外阴癌的淋巴结转移是一个关键的预后因素,与较高的复发率和生存率降低相关。据报道,辅助放疗可带来生存获益,但可能有显著的并发症。我们旨在明确是否有高质量证据支持在这种情况下使用辅助放疗。本研究的目的是评估辅助放疗对局部区域转移淋巴结区域的有效性和安全性。我们对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、谷歌学术、ClinicalTrials.gov和美国国立癌症研究所进行了全面系统的文献检索。我们仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。我们识别出1760条记录,最终仅检索到一项符合条件的RCT(114例腹股沟股淋巴结阳性参与者)。所有女性均接受了根治性外阴切除术和双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术,并被随机分为辅助放疗组或术中同侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术且不进行辅助放疗组。6年时,总体生存率(OS)分别为51%和41%,放疗组占优(风险比[HR] 0.61;95%置信区间[CI] 0.30 - 1.3),差异无统计学意义,证据确定性很低。6年时,癌症相关死亡的累积发生率分别为29%和51%,辅助放疗组占优(HR 0.49;95% CI 0.28 - 0.87)。辅助放疗后6年无复发生存率为59%,盆腔淋巴结清扫术后为48%(HR 0.39;95% CI 0.17 - 0.88)。辅助放疗组和盆腔淋巴结清扫术组分别有3例(5.3%)和13例(24.1%)出现腹股沟复发。与放疗相比,盆腔淋巴结清扫术的急性毒性无显著差异。在盆腔淋巴结阳性的女性(20%)中,6年时OS分别为36%和13%,辅助放疗组占优。放疗后的晚期皮肤毒性发生率似乎更高(19%对15%),但慢性淋巴水肿较少(16%对22%)。关于对腹股沟淋巴结转移进行辅助放疗仅有非常低质量的证据。尽管所识别的研究是一项多中心RCT,但由于研究数量少、数据置信区间宽以及试验提前结束,存在合理的不精确性和不一致性,导致证据降级。