James Leah E, García Mejía Nicolás, Botero-García Juan F, Rattner Michel
Heartland Alliance International, Chicago, IL, USA.
Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Apr 30;11:e61. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.50. eCollection 2024.
Community-based psychosocial support (CB-PSS) interventions utilizing task sharing and varied (in-person, remote) modalities are essential strategies to meet mental health needs, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, knowledge gaps remain regarding feasibility and effectiveness.
This study assesses feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a CB-PSS intervention for conflict-affected adults in Colombia through parallel randomized controlled trials, one delivered in-person ( = 165) and the other remotely ( = 103), implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and national protests. Interventions were facilitated by nonspecialist community members and consisted of eight problem-solving and expressive group sessions.
Attendance was moderate and fidelity was high in both modalities. Participants in both modalities reported high levels of satisfaction, with in-person participants reporting increased comfort expressing emotions and more positive experiences with research protocols. Symptoms of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder improved among in-person participants, but there were no significant changes for remote participants in comparison to waitlist controls.
This CB-PSS intervention appears feasible and acceptable in both in-person and remote modalities and associated with reduction in some forms of distress when conducted in-person but not when conducted remotely. Methodological limitations and potential explanations and areas for future research are discussed, drawing from related studies.
基于社区的心理社会支持(CB-PSS)干预措施,利用任务分担和多种(面对面、远程)方式,是满足心理健康需求的重要策略,包括在新冠疫情期间。然而,在可行性和有效性方面仍存在知识空白。
本研究通过平行随机对照试验,评估了哥伦比亚一项针对受冲突影响成年人的CB-PSS干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性,一项是面对面实施(n = 165),另一项是远程实施(n = 103),在新冠疫情和全国抗议期间进行。干预由非专业社区成员协助进行,包括八次解决问题和表达性小组会议。
两种方式的出勤率适中,保真度高。两种方式的参与者都报告了高度的满意度,面对面参与者报告在表达情绪时更自在,对研究方案有更积极的体验。面对面参与者的抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状有所改善,但与等待名单对照组相比,远程参与者没有显著变化。
这种CB-PSS干预措施在面对面和远程方式中似乎都是可行和可接受的,面对面实施时与某些形式的痛苦减轻相关,但远程实施时则不然。借鉴相关研究,讨论了方法学局限性、潜在解释和未来研究领域。