Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭预后沟通:终末期心力衰竭患者和护理伙伴的经验和偏好。

Prognosis Communication in Heart Failure: Experiences and Preferences of End-Stage Heart Failure Patients and Care Partners.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Internal Medicine (S.S., T.C., B.K.N.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Center for Clinical Management Research (M.H.), VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, MI.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010662. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010662. Epub 2024 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure (HF) overestimate survival compared with model-predicted estimates, but the reasons for this discrepancy are poorly understood. We characterized how patients with end-stage HF and their care partners understand prognosis and elicited their preferences around prognosis communication.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with patients with end-stage HF and their care partners between 2021 and 2022 at a tertiary care center in Michigan. Participants were asked to describe barriers they faced to understanding prognosis. All interviews were coded and analyzed using an iterative content analysis approach.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with end-stage HF and 15 care partners participated, including 7 dyads. The median patient age was 66.5 years (range, 31-80) and included 9 of 15 (60%) White participants and 9 of 15 (60%) were males. Care partners included 10 of 15 (67%) White participants and 6 of 15 (40%) were males. Care partners were partners (n=7, 47%), siblings (n=4, 27%), parents (n=2, 13%), and children (n=2, 13%). Most patients demonstrated a poor understanding of their prognosis. In contrast, care partners commonly identified the patient's rapidly declining trajectory. Patients and care partners described ineffective prognosis communication with clinicians, common barriers to understanding prognosis, and similar suggestions on improving prognosis communication. Barriers to understanding prognosis included (1) conversation avoidance by physicians, (2) information inconsistency across different physicians, (3) distractions during prognosis communication due to emphasis on other conditions, and (4) confusion related to the use of medical jargon. Most patients and care partners wanted discussions around prognosis to begin early in the course of the disease, repeated routinely using layperson's terms, incorporating both quality of life and survival assessments, and involving care partners. Both patients and care partners did not expect precise survival estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with end-stage HF demonstrate a poor understanding of their prognosis compared with their care partners. Patients and care partners are open to discussing prognosis early, using direct and patient-centered language.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)患者对生存率的估计高于模型预测,但对这种差异的原因知之甚少。我们描述了终末期 HF 患者及其护理伙伴如何理解预后,并引出了他们对预后沟通的偏好。

方法

我们在密歇根州的一家三级保健中心,于 2021 年至 2022 年期间对终末期 HF 患者及其护理伙伴进行了深入的半结构化访谈。参与者被要求描述他们在理解预后方面面临的障碍。所有访谈均使用迭代内容分析方法进行编码和分析。

结果

15 名终末期 HF 患者和 15 名护理伙伴参与了研究,其中包括 7 对。患者的中位年龄为 66.5 岁(范围 31-80 岁),其中 15 名患者中有 9 名(60%)为白人,15 名患者中有 9 名(60%)为男性。护理伙伴中,15 名中有 10 名(67%)为白人,6 名(40%)为男性。护理伙伴包括 7 名(47%)伴侣、4 名(27%)兄弟姐妹、2 名(13%)父母和 2 名(13%)子女。大多数患者对自己的预后了解不佳。相比之下,护理伙伴通常能识别出患者快速恶化的轨迹。患者和护理伙伴描述了与临床医生进行无效的预后沟通、理解预后的常见障碍以及改善预后沟通的类似建议。理解预后的障碍包括:(1)医生避免讨论,(2)不同医生之间信息不一致,(3)因强调其他病情而导致预后沟通时注意力分散,以及(4)与使用医学术语相关的困惑。大多数患者和护理伙伴希望在疾病早期就开始讨论预后,定期使用通俗易懂的语言,同时包括生活质量和生存评估,并让护理伙伴参与。患者和护理伙伴都不期望得到确切的生存估计。

结论

与护理伙伴相比,终末期 HF 患者对自身预后的了解较差。患者和护理伙伴都愿意在疾病早期进行讨论,使用直接和以患者为中心的语言。

相似文献

1
Prognosis Communication in Heart Failure: Experiences and Preferences of End-Stage Heart Failure Patients and Care Partners.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010662. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010662. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Preferences of patients with heart failure for prognosis communication.
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Aug;23(10):791-6. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70829-2.
4
Communicating prognosis and end-of-life care to heart failure patients: a survey of heart failure nurses' perspectives.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Apr;13(2):152-61. doi: 10.1177/1474515114521746. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
6
Advance Care Planning in Older Adults with CKD: Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perspectives.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1527-1535. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020091298. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Lived Experiences of Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Kidney Dysfunction.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55008.

本文引用的文献

2
Non-Concordance between Patient and Clinician Estimates of Prognosis in Advanced Heart Failure.
J Card Fail. 2021 Jun;27(6):700-705. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.03.005.
3
Show Me the Money: Patients' Perspectives on a Decision Aid for Sacubitril/Valsartan Addressing Out-of-Pocket Cost.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Dec;13(12):e007070. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007070. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Prognostic Understanding and Preference for the Communication Process with Physicians in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients.
J Card Fail. 2021 Mar;27(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
Patient and clinician experience of a serious illness conversation guide in oncology: A descriptive analysis.
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4550-4560. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3102. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Family Caregiving for Individuals With Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2020 Jun 2;141(22):e864-e878. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000768. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.
8
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Discordant Perceptions of Prognosis and Treatment Options Between Physicians and Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Sep;5(9):663-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Cognitive Impairment and Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Card Fail. 2017 Jun;23(6):464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验