Suppr超能文献

中德合作开展身体活动转介计划:利益相关者经验的定性分析

Coproducing a physical activity referral scheme in Germany: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 22;14(5):e082710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082710.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated stakeholders' experiences of participating in a coproduction process to develop a physical activity referral scheme (PARS) in the German healthcare system. The focus was on examining facilitators and challenges, along with gathering insights on potential modifications to the joint development process, all from the viewpoint of stakeholders.

DESIGN

This qualitative study employed one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and the findings were analysed using summarising qualitative content analysis.

SETTING

The study focused on the German healthcare system.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven stakeholders from the coproduction process were purposefully selected for interviews using maximum variation sampling. The interviewees represented different sectors (physician associations, physical activity professionals' associations, health insurance companies and patient organisations), various positions within their organisations, and different levels of attendance during the coproduction process.

RESULTS

In almost all interviews, the following factors were highlighted as facilitators of the development process: coproduction approach, process of coproduction, multi-sector stakeholder group, possibility of active participation, coordinating role of researchers, communication, atmosphere and interaction. In contrast, differences in roles and hierarchy, merging of different perspectives, clarification of intervention costs, and competition and conflicting interests were pointed out as challenges. Only a few suggestions regarding adaptations in terms of group composition and cooperation among stakeholders were mentioned.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholder experiences with the joint development process were predominantly positive, indicating that coproduction is a beneficial approach for the development of PARS intended for integration into healthcare systems. The effective management of power differences among stakeholders is intricately tied to the coproduction method; therefore, it should be selected carefully. The research team plays a pivotal role in coordinating and negotiating the process, and the team should be equipped with a diverse set of skills and knowledge, particularly to understand the intricacies of the healthcare system where the PARS is intended for implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04947787.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了利益相关者参与德国医疗保健系统中制定体力活动推荐计划(PARS)的共同制定过程的经验。重点是从利益相关者的角度检查促进因素和挑战,以及收集关于联合制定过程潜在修改的见解。

设计

这项定性研究采用了一对一的半结构化访谈,使用总结性定性内容分析对研究结果进行分析。

设置

该研究专注于德国医疗保健系统。

参与者

通过最大变异抽样,从共同制定过程中选择了 7 名利益相关者进行访谈。受访者代表不同的部门(医师协会、体力活动专业人员协会、健康保险公司和患者组织)、组织内的不同职位以及共同制定过程中的不同参与程度。

结果

在几乎所有访谈中,都强调了以下因素是开发过程的促进因素:共同制定方法、共同制定过程、多部门利益相关者群体、积极参与的可能性、研究人员的协调作用、沟通、氛围和互动。相比之下,角色和层次的差异、不同观点的融合、干预成本的澄清、竞争和利益冲突被指出是挑战。仅提到了一些关于利益相关者群体组成和合作方面的适应调整的建议。

结论

利益相关者对共同制定过程的经验主要是积极的,这表明共同制定是开发旨在纳入医疗保健系统的 PARS 的有益方法。有效管理利益相关者之间的权力差异与共同制定方法密切相关,因此应谨慎选择。研究团队在协调和谈判过程中起着关键作用,团队应具备多样化的技能和知识,特别是要理解 PARS 实施的医疗保健系统的复杂性。

临床试验注册号

NCT04947787。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Germany: Health System Review.德国:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Dec;22(6):1-272.
8
Co-production of knowledge: the future.知识共创:未来。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验