Spector Sean, Shah Shanaya, Ul Rasool Muhammad Haseeb, Hilt Elizabeth, Goldstein Howard, Meade Jason, Korn Electra, Lipetskaia Lioudmila
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA.
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(10):e30092. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30092. eCollection 2024 May 30.
Urogynecology patients skew older and often require intimate exams to treat non-life-threatening conditions, thus making care particularly susceptible to the effects of COVID-19. We aim to understand COVID-19 vaccination attitudes amongst urogynecology patients during the pandemic, which has adversely affected healthcare delivery, to identify measures that can be undertaken to improve care going forward.
Cross-sectional surveys of urogynecology patients were conducted in three different states (Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) between March and August 2021. Demographics, vaccination status, and COVID-19 attitudes were analyzed. Chi-square tests investigated group differences between vaccine-hesitant and unhesitant subjects.
Out of 158 surveys, eighty-three percent of respondents were vaccinated or planning to get vaccinated. Older age and regular flu vaccination predicted COVID-19 vaccination. Ninety-three percent of subjects were comfortable attending in-person visits. However, vaccine-hesitant individuals were less comfortable attending in-person and were significantly less likely to be comforted by clinic interventions, such as masking. Hesitant and unhesitant groups trusted doctors or medical professionals most for their source of COVID-19 information.
Urogynecology patients mirror the general older population's COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, with distinct differences between hesitant and unhesitant groups. Vaccine-hesitant subjects appear less comfortable coming to in-person visits and less comforted by possible interventions, posing a difficult obstacle for clinics to overcome. High levels of patient trust suggest healthcare providers can play a crucial role in encouraging COVID-19 vaccination and combating misinformation.
泌尿妇科患者年龄偏大,通常需要进行私密检查来治疗非危及生命的疾病,因此其护理特别容易受到新冠疫情的影响。我们旨在了解疫情期间泌尿妇科患者对新冠疫苗接种的态度,疫情对医疗服务产生了不利影响,我们希望借此确定未来可采取哪些措施来改善护理。
2021年3月至8月期间,在三个不同州(特拉华州、新泽西州和宾夕法尼亚州)对泌尿妇科患者进行了横断面调查。分析了人口统计学、疫苗接种状况和对新冠疫情的态度。采用卡方检验研究了对疫苗持犹豫态度和不犹豫态度的受试者之间的群体差异。
在158份调查问卷中,83%的受访者已接种或计划接种疫苗。年龄较大和定期接种流感疫苗可预测新冠疫苗接种情况。93%的受试者对进行面对面就诊感到安心。然而,对疫苗持犹豫态度的个体对面对面就诊不太安心,并且诊所采取的诸如戴口罩等干预措施对他们的安慰作用明显较小。犹豫组和不犹豫组在获取新冠疫情信息方面,最信任医生或医疗专业人员。
泌尿妇科患者反映了老年人群体对新冠疫苗接种的态度,犹豫组和不犹豫组之间存在明显差异。对疫苗持犹豫态度的受试者似乎对前来进行面对面就诊不太安心,对可能的干预措施也不太放心,这给诊所带来了难以克服的障碍。患者的高度信任表明,医疗服务提供者在鼓励新冠疫苗接种和对抗错误信息方面可以发挥关键作用。