Potsdam Embodied Cognition Group, University of Potsdam.
Department of Neurology, Aging Brain and Cognition Laboratory, Georgetown University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1725-1764. doi: 10.1037/xge0001555. Epub 2024 May 23.
Processing action words (e.g., ) engages neurocognitive motor representations, consistent with embodied cognition principles. Despite age-related neurocognitive changes that could affect action words, and a rapidly aging population, the impact of healthy aging on action-word processing is poorly understood. Previous research suggests that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, such as picture naming, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance (e.g., vs)-particularly in older adults, perhaps due to the age-related relative sparing of motor-semantic circuitry, which can support action words. However, motor-relatedness was recently found to affect performance in younger but not older adults in lexical decision. We hypothesized this was due to decreased semantic access in this task, especially in older adults. Here we tested effects of motor-relatedness on 2,174 words in younger and older adults not only in lexical decision but also in reading aloud, in which semantic access is minimal. Mixed-effects regression, controlling for phonological, lexical, and semantic variables, yielded results consistent with our predictions. In lexical decision, younger adults were faster and more accurate at words with higher-motor relatedness, whereas older adults showed no motor-relatedness effects. In reading aloud, neither age group showed such effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the patterns were robust. Altogether, whereas previous research indicates that in lexical tasks demanding semantic access, higher motor-relatedness can enhance performance, especially in older adults, evidence now suggests that such effects are attenuated with decreased semantic access, which in turn depends on the task as well as aging itself. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
处理动作词(例如)涉及神经认知运动表现,与具身认知原则一致。尽管与年龄相关的神经认知变化可能会影响动作词,而且人口老龄化速度很快,但健康老龄化对动作词处理的影响还知之甚少。先前的研究表明,在需要语义访问的词汇任务中,例如图片命名,更高的运动相关性可以提高表现(例如,与相比)——尤其是在老年人中,这可能是由于与年龄相关的运动语义回路相对保留,可以支持动作词。然而,最近发现运动相关性会影响年轻但不影响老年成年人在词汇决策中的表现。我们假设这是由于在这个任务中语义访问减少,尤其是在老年人中。在这里,我们不仅在词汇决策中,而且在语义访问最小的朗读中,测试了运动相关性对年轻和老年成年人的 2174 个单词的影响。混合效应回归,控制了语音、词汇和语义变量,得出的结果与我们的预测一致。在词汇决策中,年轻成年人对运动相关性较高的单词反应更快、更准确,而老年人则没有表现出运动相关性的影响。在朗读中,两个年龄组都没有表现出这种影响。多项敏感性分析表明,这些模式是稳健的。总的来说,虽然先前的研究表明,在需要语义访问的词汇任务中,较高的运动相关性可以提高表现,尤其是在老年人中,但现在的证据表明,这种影响随着语义访问的减少而减弱,而语义访问又取决于任务以及衰老本身。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。