• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隐形但有影响力的伴随者:词的伴随者的属性影响词汇和语义处理。

Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words' associates influence lexical and semantic processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2257-2265. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02485-5. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02485-5
PMID:38459396
Abstract

In many models of lexical and semantic processing, it is assumed that single word processing is a function of the characteristics of the words presented and the distributional properties of the words' networks. Recent research suggests that semantic characteristics of a target word's associates may in fact influence target-word responses in lexical-semantic tasks. The present study extends that previous research to examine whether lexical and semantic properties of target-word associates are recruited during lexical and semantic decision tasks, and whether the type of associate information recruited varies as a function of task and concreteness of the target word. We found that lexical-semantic properties of words' first associates are related to accuracy of responses to words in lexical decision, and that semantic properties of words' first associates are related to both response time and accuracy in semantic decision. Further, these effects differ depending on the target word's concreteness. These findings provide new insight about the way words' associates contribute to semantic representation and processing, even though the associates are not actually presented, moving beyond previous assumptions about lexical-semantic processing of single words.

摘要

在许多词汇和语义处理模型中,人们假设单个单词的处理是由呈现单词的特征和单词网络的分布特性决定的。最近的研究表明,目标词的联想词的语义特征实际上可能会影响词汇语义任务中的目标词反应。本研究将之前的研究扩展到考察目标词联想词的词汇和语义属性是否在词汇和语义决策任务中被招募,以及招募的联想词信息类型是否会根据任务和目标词的具体性而有所不同。我们发现,词的第一联想词的词汇语义属性与词汇决策中对词的反应准确性有关,而词的第一联想词的语义属性与语义决策中的反应时间和准确性都有关。此外,这些影响因目标词的具体性而异。这些发现提供了关于单词联想词如何有助于语义表示和处理的新见解,即使联想词实际上并未呈现,这也超越了关于单个单词词汇语义处理的先前假设。

相似文献

1
Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words' associates influence lexical and semantic processing.隐形但有影响力的伴随者:词的伴随者的属性影响词汇和语义处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2257-2265. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02485-5. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.一切都在于呈现方式:语境效价、唤醒水平和具体性对视觉单词加工的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.更多是否总是更好?语义丰富度对词汇判断、快速发音和语义分类的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):742-50. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y.
4
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
5
There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.致富的方式有很多种:语义丰富度的三种度量对视觉单词识别的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):161-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161.
6
Socialness effects in lexical-semantic processing.词汇语义加工中的社交效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Aug;50(8):1329-1343. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001328. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
7
Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.映射语义空间:属性规范与语义丰富度
Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):637-649. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00933-y. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务中的正字法邻域效应和具体性效应。
Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.001.
9
Visual mismatch negativity elicited by semantic violations in visual words.视觉词中语义违反引发的视觉失配负波。
Brain Res. 2020 Nov 1;1746:147010. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147010. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.简单谈一谈“非词”:在词汇判断任务中,非词的频率、语义近邻密度和正字法到语义一致性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):157-183. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000819. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.包含英语、爱沙尼亚语、法语、德语、意大利语、立陶宛语和西班牙语中情感和颜色词汇的62个单词数据集的自由联想数据库:来自14个国家的数据。
J Open Psychol Data. 2025 Aug 4;13:4. doi: 10.5334/jopd.140. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Heterogenous abstract concepts: is "ponder" different from "dissolve"?异构抽象概念:“沉思”与“消解”是否不同?
Psychol Res. 2022 Nov;86(8):2478-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01398-x.
2
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
3
The "Small World of Words" English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words.《“小世界字词”英语单词联想范式 12000 余条》。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):987-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7.
4
It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.一切都在于呈现方式:语境效价、唤醒水平和具体性对视觉单词加工的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.卡尔加里语义决策项目:一万个英语单词的具体/抽象决策数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):407-417. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0720-6.
6
Semantic classification of pictures and words.图片和文字的语义分类。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1502-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.975728. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
7
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.四万常见英语单词词素的具体性等级评定。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
8
Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas.13915 个英语词汇的效价、唤醒度和支配度的常模。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1191-207. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x.
9
Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.语义多样性:一种基于词汇上下文使用变化的语义模糊性度量。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):718-30. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x.
10
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.