Science Based Training Research Group. Department of Sports and Computers Sciences. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports and Computers Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):1401-1412. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004820. Epub 2024 May 21.
Cornejo-Daza, PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas, J, Páez-Maldonado, J, Rodiles-Guerrero, L, Boullosa, D, León-Prados, JA, Wernbom, M, and Pareja-Blanco, F. Acute responses to traditional and cluster-set squat training with and without blood flow restriction. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1401-1412, 2024-To compare the acute responses to different set configurations (cluster [CLU] vs. traditional [TRA]) under distinct blood flow conditions (free vs. restricted) in full-squat (SQ). Twenty resistance-trained males performed 4 protocols that differed in the set configuration (TRA: continuous repetitions; vs. CLU: 30 seconds of rest every 2 repetitions) and in the blood flow condition (FF: free-flow; vs. blood flow restriction [BFR]: 50% of arterial occlusion pressure). The relative intensity (60% 1RM), volume (3 sets of 8 repetitions), and resting time (2 minutes) were equated. Mean propulsive force (MPF), velocity (MPV) and power (MPP), and electromyography (EMG) parameters were recorded during each repetition. Tensiomyography (TMG), blood lactate, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, in SQ, and movement velocity against the load that elicited a 1 m·s -1 velocity at baseline (V1-load) in SQ were assessed at pre- and post-exercise. The CLU protocols allowed a better maintenance of MPF, MPV, MPP, and EMG median frequency during the exercise compared to TRA (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05). The TRA protocols experienced greater impairments post-exercise in TMG- and EMG-derived variables (clu-time interaction, p < 0.05) and SQ and CMJ performance (clu-time interaction, p = 0.08 and p < 0.05, respectively), as well as higher blood lactate concentrations (clu-time interaction, p < 0.001) than CLU. Moreover, BFR displayed decreases in TMG variables (bfr-time interaction, p < 0.01), but BFR-CLU resulted in the greatest reduction in twitch contraction time ( p < 0.001). Cluster sets reduced fatigue during and after the training session and BFR exacerbated impairments in muscle mechanical properties; however, the combination of both could improve contraction speed after exercise.
科内霍-达萨、PJ、桑切斯-瓦尔迪佩纳斯、J、佩兹-马德诺多、J、罗迪莱斯-格雷罗、L、布尔洛萨、D、莱昂-普拉多斯、JA、韦恩博姆、M 和帕雷哈-布兰科、F. 传统和集群集深蹲训练与有无血流限制的急性反应。J 力量与调节研究 38(8):1401-1412,2024-比较不同集合配置(集群[CLU]与传统[TRA])在不同血流条件(自由与限制)下全深蹲(SQ)的急性反应。20 名受过阻力训练的男性进行了 4 种不同的方案,方案在集合配置(TRA:连续重复;CLU:每重复 2 次休息 30 秒)和血流条件(FF:自由流动;BFR:动脉闭塞压的 50%)方面有所不同。相对强度(60%1RM)、体积(3 组 8 次重复)和休息时间(2 分钟)相等。记录每次重复的平均推进力(MPF)、速度(MPV)和功率(MPP)和肌电图(EMG)参数。在运动前和运动后评估了张力肌电图(TMG)、血乳酸、反跳跳(CMJ)高度、最大自主等长收缩、SQ 和运动速度,以在基线时产生 1 m·s -1 的速度(V1 负载)在 SQ 中。CLU 方案在运动过程中比 TRA 方案更好地保持 MPF、MPV、MPP 和 EMG 中值频率(CLU 时间交互,p <0.05)。TRA 方案在运动后 TMG 和 EMG 衍生变量(CLU 时间交互,p <0.05)和 SQ 和 CMJ 性能(CLU 时间交互,p = 0.08 和 p <0.05)以及更高的血乳酸浓度(CLU 时间交互,p <0.001)比 CLU 方案差。此外,BFR 显示 TMG 变量下降(bfr-time 交互,p <0.01),但 BFR-CLU 导致抽搐收缩时间最大减少(p <0.001)。集群集在训练过程中和训练后减少了疲劳,而 BFR 加剧了肌肉机械性能的损伤;然而,两者的结合可以在运动后提高收缩速度。