Suppr超能文献

全蹲时不同设置组合的机械、代谢和感知急性反应

Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Acute Responses to Different Set Configurations in Full Squat.

机构信息

Faculty of Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio, Murcia, Spain.

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1581-1590. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002117.

Abstract

González-Hernández, JM, García-Ramos, A, Castaño-Zambudio, A, Capelo-Ramírez, F, Marquez, G, Boullosa, D, and Jiménez-Reyes, P. Mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual acute responses to different set configurations in full squat. J Strength Cond Res 34(6): 1581-1590, 2020-This study aimed to compare mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual responses between 2 traditional (TR) and 4 cluster (CL) set configurations. In a counterbalanced randomized order, 11 men were tested with the following protocols in separate sessions (sets × repetitions [interrepetition rest]): TR1: 3 × 10 [0 seconds]; TR2: 6 × 5 [0 seconds]; CL1: 3 × 10 [10 seconds]; CL2: 3 × 10 [15 seconds]; CL3: 3 × 10 [30 seconds]; CL4: 1 × 30 [15 seconds]. The exercise (full squat), number of repetitions (30), interset rest (5 minutes), and resistance applied (10 repetition maximum) was the same for all set configurations. Mechanical fatigue was quantified by measuring the mean propulsive velocity during each repetition and the change in countermovement jump height observed after each set and after the whole training session. Metabolic and perceptual fatigue were assessed via the blood lactate concentration and the OMNI perceived exertion scale measured after each training set, respectively. The mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual measures of fatigue were always significantly higher for the TR1 set configuration. The 2 set configurations that most minimized the mechanical measures of fatigue were CL2 and CL3. Perceived fatigue did not differ between the TR2, CL1, CL2, and CL3 set configurations. The lowest lactate concentration was observed in the CL3 set configuration. Therefore, both the CL2 and CL3 set configurations can be recommended because they maximize mechanical performance. However, the CL2 set configuration presents 2 main advantages with respect to CL3 (a): it reduces training session duration, and (b) it promotes higher metabolic stress, which, to some extent, may be beneficial for inducing muscle strength and hypertrophy gains.

摘要

冈萨雷斯-埃尔南德斯,JM,加西亚-拉莫斯,A,卡斯塔诺-赞布迪奥,A,卡佩洛-拉米雷斯,F,马尔克斯,G,布洛萨,D,和希门尼斯-雷耶斯,P。在全蹲中,不同组配置的机械、代谢和感知急性反应。J 力量与调理研究 34(6):1581-1590,2020-本研究旨在比较 2 种传统(TR)和 4 种集群(CL)组配置之间的机械、代谢和感知反应。在一个平衡随机顺序中,11 名男性在单独的会议中进行了以下方案测试(组×重复[组间休息]):TR1:3×10[0 秒];TR2:6×5[0 秒];CL1:3×10[10 秒];CL2:3×10[15 秒];CL3:3×10[30 秒];CL4:1×30[15 秒]。所有组配置的运动(全蹲)、重复次数(30 次)、组间休息(5 分钟)和应用阻力(10 次最大重复)相同。通过测量每次重复的平均推进速度以及在每组和整个训练课后测量的反跳高度的变化来量化机械疲劳。通过在每次训练组后测量血乳酸浓度和 OMNI 感知用力量表来评估代谢和感知疲劳。TR1 组配置的机械、代谢和感知疲劳测量值始终显著更高。最小化机械疲劳测量值的 2 个组配置是 CL2 和 CL3。TR2、CL1、CL2 和 CL3 组配置之间的感知疲劳没有差异。CL3 组配置的乳酸浓度最低。因此,CL2 和 CL3 组配置都可以推荐,因为它们最大限度地提高了机械性能。然而,CL2 组配置相对于 CL3 具有 2 个主要优势(a):它缩短了训练课时间,(b)它促进了更高的代谢应激,在某种程度上,这可能有利于诱导肌肉力量和肥大增益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验