Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Oncology Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Centre for Involvement of Relatives, Mental Health Services, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae041.
Considering the persistent nature and higher prevalence of insomnia in cancer patients and survivors compared with the general population, there is a need for effective management strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the available evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia in adult cancer patients and survivors.
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed data from 61 randomized controlled trials involving 6528 participants. Interventions included pharmacological, physical, and psychological treatments, with a focus on insomnia severity and secondary sleep and non-sleep outcomes. Frequentist and Bayesian analytical strategies were employed for data synthesis and interpretation.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) emerged as the most efficacious intervention for reducing insomnia severity in cancer survivors and further demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. CBT-I showed a large postintervention effect (g = 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57 to 1.15) and a medium effect at follow-up (g = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.92). Other interventions such as bright white light therapy, sleep medication, melatonin, exercise, mind-body therapies, and mindfulness-based therapies showed benefits, but the evidence for their efficacy was less convincing compared with CBT-I. Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia showed promise as a less burdensome alternative for patients in active cancer treatment.
CBT-I is supported as a first-line treatment for insomnia in cancer survivors, with significant benefits observed across sleep and non-sleep outcomes. The findings also highlight the potential of less intensive alternatives. The research contributes valuable insights for clinical practice and underscores the need for further exploration into the complexities of sleep disturbances in cancer patients and survivors.
考虑到癌症患者和幸存者的失眠具有持续性和更高的发生率,与一般人群相比,他们需要有效的管理策略。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在全面评估针对成人癌症患者和幸存者失眠的药物和非药物干预措施的有效性证据。
根据 PRISMA 指南,我们分析了 61 项随机对照试验的数据,涉及 6528 名参与者。干预措施包括药物、物理和心理治疗,重点关注失眠严重程度以及次要睡眠和非睡眠结果。我们使用了频率论和贝叶斯分析策略来进行数据分析和解释。
失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)是最有效的干预措施,可以减轻癌症幸存者的失眠严重程度,并且进一步显示出在疲劳、抑郁症状和焦虑方面的显著改善。CBT-I 在干预后具有较大的效果(g=0.86;95%置信区间[CI]:0.57 至 1.15),在随访时具有中等效果(g=0.55;95%CI:0.18 至 0.92)。其他干预措施,如明亮的白光疗法、睡眠药物、褪黑素、运动、身心疗法和正念疗法,也显示出了益处,但与 CBT-I 相比,其疗效的证据不太令人信服。简短的行为疗法治疗失眠症作为一种对处于癌症积极治疗中的患者负担较轻的替代方法,显示出了前景。
CBT-I 被支持作为癌症幸存者失眠的一线治疗方法,在睡眠和非睡眠结果方面都有显著的益处。研究结果还强调了采用不那么密集的替代方法的潜力。该研究为临床实践提供了有价值的见解,并强调了进一步探索癌症患者和幸存者睡眠障碍复杂性的必要性。