Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, No. 7 Weiwu Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Chest Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3691-3702. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10822-x. Epub 2024 May 23.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of esophagectomy with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) vs. esophagectomy alone. METHODS: A total of 1798 patients who received esophagectomy between January 2010 and February 2020 were included and divided into the 38 patients who underwent OPCABG followed by esophagectomy (OP + ES group) and 1760 patients had only esophagectomy (ES group). Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariable analyses were performed to compare postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 37 patients in the OP + ES group matched with 74 in the ES group. The matched OP + ES group had higher total postoperative complications than the ES group, especially more pulmonary infections (P = 0.001) and arrhythmias (P = 0.018), but no other postoperative complications were the difference. The DFS was similar and the OS was a significant difference between the matching 2 groups (log-rank, P = 0.132 and 0.04, respectively). Although pT 3/4 stage, pN (+), and tumor length > 3.0 cm were independently associated with worse OS and DFS in multivariable analysis, CAD and EF < 55% were also found to be a predictive factor for OS and DFS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: OPCABG followed by esophagectomy for esophageal cancer associated with coronary artery disease has equivalent DFS and recurrence pattern to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer alone, but with a disadvantage in OS.
背景:本研究旨在评估非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)联合食管癌切除术与单纯食管癌切除术的长期生存结局。
方法:共纳入 1798 例 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受食管癌切除术的患者,分为接受 OPCABG 联合食管癌切除术的 38 例患者(OP+C 组)和仅接受食管癌切除术的 1760 例患者(ES 组)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和 Cox 多变量分析比较两组术后并发症、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。
结果:OP+C 组有 37 例患者匹配 ES 组的 74 例患者。匹配后的 OP+C 组总术后并发症发生率高于 ES 组,尤其是肺部感染(P=0.001)和心律失常(P=0.018),但其他术后并发症无差异。DFS 相似,OS 两组有显著差异(log-rank,P=0.132 和 0.04)。虽然 pT3/4 期、pN(+)和肿瘤长度>3.0cm 在多变量分析中与 OS 和 DFS 较差相关,但 CAD 和 EF<55%在单变量分析中也被发现是 OS 和 DFS 的预测因素。
结论:与单纯食管癌切除术相比,合并冠心病的食管癌患者行 OPCABG 联合食管癌切除术具有相似的 DFS 和复发模式,但 OS 较差。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-9
J Transl Med. 2023-9-19
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022-2-9