Lewis Robert David, Kanagasingam Shalini, Cook Neil, Krysmann Marta, Taylor Kathryn, Pisani Flavio
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 16;12(10):1035. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101035.
The removal of dental plaque from the gingival margins of the teeth is essential to maintaining periodontal health. Whilst it has been established that electric toothbrushes demonstrate a greater ability to remove plaque, no systematic review has specifically investigated which technology is better for removing plaque from the interdental tooth surfaces, where plaque control may be more difficult. Three databases were searched until October 2023: MEDLINE and DOSSS via EBSCOhost and Embase. Data extraction was carried out on studies which met the inclusion criteria, and a risk of bias assessment was completed. The study findings were combined via a narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis where appropriate. A total of 77 studies were found, out of which 14 were selected and included in the analysis. The mean difference in interproximal plaque reduction, measured using the Rustogi Modified Naval Plaque Index (RMNPI) at 8 weeks, was 0.09 ( < 0.00001) in favor of the oscillating-rotating toothbrush. At 6 and 12 weeks, the mean difference in plaque reduction (RMNPI) was 0.05 ( = 0.0008) and 0.04 ( = 0.0001) in favor of the oscillating-rotating toothbrush, respectively. The studies show a tendency for oscillating-rotating toothbrushes to remove more interproximal plaque than oscillating toothbrushes, especially in a short time (8 weeks).
从牙齿牙龈边缘清除牙菌斑对于维持牙周健康至关重要。虽然已经证实电动牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面能力更强,但尚无系统评价专门研究哪种技术在清除牙间隙牙齿表面的牙菌斑方面效果更佳,而牙间隙的菌斑控制可能更具难度。检索了三个数据库直至2023年10月:通过EBSCOhost检索MEDLINE和DOSSS以及Embase。对符合纳入标准的研究进行数据提取,并完成偏倚风险评估。研究结果通过叙述性综合分析和在适当情况下进行的荟萃分析进行汇总。共找到77项研究,其中14项被选中并纳入分析。使用Rustogi改良海军菌斑指数(RMNPI)在8周时测量,邻面菌斑减少的平均差异为0.09(<0.00001),有利于旋转振荡式牙刷。在6周和12周时,菌斑减少(RMNPI)的平均差异分别为0.05(=0.0008)和0.04(=0.0001),均有利于旋转振荡式牙刷。研究表明,旋转振荡式牙刷比摆动式牙刷更倾向于清除更多的邻面菌斑,尤其是在短时间内(8周)。