Department of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Faculty of Social Welfare, Nihon Fukushi University, Aichi, Japan.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13132.
There are limited data on whether the vulnerabilities and impacts of social isolation vary across populations.
To explore the association between social isolation and mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and malignant neoplasms focusing on heterogeneity by sociodemographic factors.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a moderator-wide approach to examine the heterogeneity in the association of social isolation with all-cause, CVD, and malignant neoplasm mortality using baseline data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study in 2010 and 2011. Eligible participants were adults aged 65 years or older without heart disease, stroke, cancer, or impaired activity of daily living across 12 Japanese municipalities. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2017, identifying 6-year all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and malignant neoplasm mortality. Logistic regression assessed effect modification by age, gender, education, income, population density, marital status, and employment on mortality associations. Data analysis was performed from September 13, 2023, to March 17, 2024.
Social isolation, determined by a 3-item scale (scores of 2 or 3 indicating isolation) was the primary exposure variable.
Six-year all-cause, CVD, and malignant neoplasms mortality.
This study included 37 604 older adults, with a mean (SD) age of 73.5 (5.9) years (21 073 women [56.0%]). A total of 10 094 participants (26.8%) were classified as experiencing social isolation. Social isolation was associated with increased all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09-1.32]), CVD (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.98-1.52]), and malignant neoplasm mortality (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]). Stratified analysis showed associations of social isolation with all-cause and malignant neoplasm mortality among people with high income (highest tertile all cause: OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.06-1.53]; malignant neoplasm: OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.02-1.60]), living in areas with high population density (highest tertile all cause: OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.26-1.72]; malignant neoplasm: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.11-1.70]), not married (all cause: OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.15-1.53]; malignant neoplasm: OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.52]), and retirees (all cause: OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.14-1.43]; malignant neoplasm: OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.10-1.48]). Formal testing for effect modification indicated modification by population density and employment for all-cause mortality and by household income and employment for neoplasm mortality.
Social isolation was associated with increased risks of all-cause, CVD, and malignant neoplasm mortality, with associations varying across populations. This study fills an important gap in research on social isolation, emphasizing its varied associations across demographic and socioeconomic groups.
关于社会隔离的脆弱性和影响是否因人群而异,相关数据有限。
通过社会隔离与全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)和恶性肿瘤死亡率之间的关联,探索社会隔离与全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和恶性肿瘤死亡率之间的关系,并重点关注社会人口统计学因素的异质性。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究采用广泛的调节者方法,使用 2010 年和 2011 年日本老年评估研究的基线数据,探讨社会隔离与全因、心血管疾病和恶性肿瘤死亡率之间的关联的异质性。合格的参与者为 12 个日本市町村的无心脏病、中风、癌症或日常生活活动受损的 65 岁或以上成年人。随访持续到 2017 年 12 月 31 日,确定了 6 年全因、心血管疾病(CVD)和恶性肿瘤死亡率。逻辑回归评估了年龄、性别、教育、收入、人口密度、婚姻状况和就业对死亡率关联的影响。数据分析于 2023 年 9 月 13 日至 2024 年 3 月 17 日进行。
社会隔离由一个 3 项量表(得分 2 或 3 表示隔离)确定,是主要的暴露变量。
6 年全因、心血管疾病和恶性肿瘤死亡率。
本研究纳入了 37604 名老年人,平均(标准差)年龄为 73.5(5.9)岁(21073 名女性[56.0%])。共有 10094 名参与者(26.8%)被归类为经历社会隔离。社会隔离与全因(比值比[OR],1.20[95%CI,1.09-1.32])、心血管疾病(OR,1.22[95%CI,0.98-1.52])和恶性肿瘤死亡率(OR,1.14[95%CI,1.01-1.28])增加相关。分层分析显示,社会隔离与高收入人群(最高三分位全因:OR,1.27[95%CI,1.06-1.53];恶性肿瘤:OR,1.27[95%CI,1.02-1.60])、人口密度高的地区(最高三分位全因:OR,1.47[95%CI,1.26-1.72];恶性肿瘤:OR,1.38[95%CI,1.11-1.70])、非已婚(全因:OR,1.33[95%CI,1.15-1.53];恶性肿瘤:OR,1.25[95%CI,1.02-1.52])和退休人员(全因:OR,1.27[95%CI,1.14-1.43];恶性肿瘤:OR,1.27[95%CI,1.10-1.48])的全因和恶性肿瘤死亡率相关。正式的效应修饰检验表明,全因死亡率的人口密度和就业存在修饰作用,肿瘤死亡率的家庭收入和就业存在修饰作用。
社会隔离与全因、心血管疾病和恶性肿瘤死亡率的风险增加相关,其相关性因人群而异。本研究填补了社会隔离研究的重要空白,强调了其在人口统计学和社会经济群体中的不同关联。