Suppr超能文献

简短正念生态瞬间干预是否比自我监测应用程序更能有效治疗社交焦虑障碍?一项随机对照试验。

Is a brief mindfulness ecological momentary intervention more efficacious than a self-monitoring app for social anxiety disorder? A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School (HMS), Department of Health Care Policy, USA; National University of Singapore (NUS), Department of Psychology, USA.

National University of Singapore (NUS), Department of Psychology, USA.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Jun;104:102858. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102858. Epub 2024 Mar 24.

Abstract

Despite their proliferation, limited knowledge exists regarding possible benefits of brief mindfulness ecological momentary interventions (MEMIs) for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Propositions that MEMIs could alleviate SAD symptoms and related clinical outcomes remain untested. This trial evaluated a 14-day MEMI for SAD. Participants with self-reported SAD were randomized to MEMI (n = 96) or self-monitoring app (SM; n = 95). Whereas MEMI instructed mindfulness exercises, SM prompted only self-monitoring five times daily for 14 days. Participants completed state-level self-reports of depression, anxiety, and mindfulness pre-post-mindfulness practice and SAD symptoms, worry, depression severity, repetitive negative thinking, and trait mindfulness at pre-randomization, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up (1MFU). Hierarchical linear modeling was conducted. The MEMI yielded statistically significantly larger improvements in momentary depression, anxiety, and mindfulness (Cohen's d = -0.10-0.11). Although no between-group effects emerged in alleviating SAD fear and avoidance, excessive worry, depression severity, repetitive negative thinking, and trait mindfulness (-0.13-0.15), within-group effects were significantly small-to-large from pre-post and pre-1MFU (-4.62-0.67). A significant reduction in depression severity occurred in MEMI (-0.63--0.60) but not SM (-0.31--0.29). Brief MEMI and SM yielded nondifferent sustained effects on SAD, comorbid symptoms, and risk factors, highlighting its potential value within stepped-care delivery settings.

摘要

尽管正念生态瞬间干预(MEMI)在广泛性焦虑症(GAD)中的应用越来越多,但对于其可能带来的益处,我们的了解仍然有限。MEMI 可能缓解 GAD 症状及相关临床结局的说法仍有待验证。本试验评估了一种针对 GAD 的 14 天 MEMI。有 GAD 自我报告的参与者被随机分配到 MEMI(n=96)或自我监测应用程序(SM;n=95)组。MEMI 指导正念练习,而 SM 仅在 14 天内每天提示五次自我监测。参与者在正念练习前后以及随机分组前、干预后和 1 个月随访(1MFU)时完成状态水平的抑郁、焦虑和正念自评,以及 GAD 症状、担忧、抑郁严重程度、重复消极思维和特质正念。采用分层线性模型进行分析。MEMI 在瞬间抑郁、焦虑和正念方面的改善具有统计学意义(Cohen's d=-0.10-0.11)。虽然在缓解 GAD 恐惧和回避、过度担忧、抑郁严重程度、重复消极思维和特质正念方面没有出现组间效应(-0.13-0.15),但在干预前后和 1MFU 前后,组内效应显著较小至较大(-4.62-0.67)。MEMI 组的抑郁严重程度显著降低(-0.63--0.60),而 SM 组没有(-0.31--0.29)。简短的 MEMI 和 SM 对 GAD、共病症状和风险因素产生了相似的持续效果,这凸显了其在阶梯式护理模式中的潜在价值。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Exposure Therapy and Its Mechanisms.暴露疗法及其机制。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;64:273-288. doi: 10.1007/7854_2023_428.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验