• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局技术转让中心网络中的持续质量改进:过程评估。

Continuous Quality Improvement in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Technology Transfer Center Network: A Process Evaluation.

机构信息

Indiana University Bloomington, USA.

American Institutes for Research (AIR), USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):154-166. doi: 10.1177/01632787241234882.

DOI:10.1177/01632787241234882
PMID:38790107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11157976/
Abstract

In healthcare and related fields, there is often a gap between research and practice. Scholars have developed frameworks to support dissemination and implementation of best practices, such as the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, which shows how scientific innovations are conveyed to practitioners through tools, training, and technical assistance (TA). Underpinning those aspects of the model are evaluation and continuous quality improvement (CQI). However, a recent meta-analysis suggests that the approaches to and outcomes from CQI in healthcare vary considerably, and that more evaluative work is needed. Therefore, this paper describes an assessment of CQI processes within the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) Technology Transfer Center (TTC) Network, a large TA/TTC system in the United States comprised of 39 distinct centers. We conducted key informant interviews ( = 71 representing 28 centers in the Network) and three surveys (100% center response rates) focused on CQI, time/effort allocation, and Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures. We used data from each of these study components to provide a robust picture of CQI within a TA/TTC system, identifying Network-specific concepts, concerns about conflation of the GPRA data with CQI, and principles that might be studied more generally.

摘要

在医疗保健和相关领域,研究与实践之间常常存在差距。学者们已经开发出了一些框架来支持最佳实践的传播和实施,例如传播和实施的互动系统框架,该框架展示了如何通过工具、培训和技术援助(TA)将科学创新传达给实践者。该模型的这些方面的基础是评估和持续质量改进(CQI)。然而,最近的一项荟萃分析表明,医疗保健中的 CQI 方法和结果差异很大,需要更多的评估工作。因此,本文描述了对美国毒品滥用和心理健康服务管理局(SAMHSA)技术转让中心(TTC)网络内 CQI 流程的评估,该网络是一个由 39 个不同中心组成的大型 TA/TTC 系统。我们进行了重点知情人访谈(= 71 人,代表网络中的 28 个中心)和三项调查(中心回复率为 100%),重点关注 CQI、时间/精力分配以及政府绩效和结果法案(GPRA)措施。我们使用了来自这些研究组成部分的数据,为 TA/TTC 系统内的 CQI 提供了一个强有力的描述,确定了网络特有的概念、对 GPRA 数据与 CQI 混淆的担忧,以及可能更普遍研究的原则。

相似文献

1
Continuous Quality Improvement in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Technology Transfer Center Network: A Process Evaluation.物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局技术转让中心网络中的持续质量改进:过程评估。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):154-166. doi: 10.1177/01632787241234882.
2
How do the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Technology Transfer Centers Decide What Evidence-Based Practices to Disseminate and Determine How to Do So? A Cross-Sectional Study of a National Network.物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局的技术转让中心如何决定要传播哪些基于证据的实践以及如何进行传播?对国家网络的一项横断面研究。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jun;47(2):167-177. doi: 10.1177/01632787231225653.
3
Organizational Network Analysis of SAMHSA's Technology Transfer Center (TTC) Network.SAMHSA 技术转让中心(TTC)网络的组织网络分析。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan;51(1):123-131. doi: 10.1007/s11414-023-09867-y. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
4
Employing continuous quality improvement in community-based substance abuse programs.在社区药物滥用项目中采用持续质量改进。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(7):604-17. doi: 10.1108/09526861211261208.
5
Impacts of continuous quality improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander primary health care in Australia.澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民初级卫生保健中持续质量改进的影响。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 18;32(4):545-571. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0056. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
Management systems, patient quality improvement, resource availability, and substance abuse treatment quality.管理系统、患者质量改进、资源可用性和物质滥用治疗质量。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1068-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01352.x. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
7
Continuous quality improvement in substance abuse treatment facilities: How much does it cost?物质滥用治疗机构的持续质量改进:成本几何?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Jun;77:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.理解原住民初级卫生保健中持续质量改进的采用情况:以 Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease 项目多地点案例研究为例。
Implement Sci. 2010 Mar 13;5:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-21.
9
A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.医疗保健系统持续质量改进的范围综述:概念化、模型和工具、障碍和促进因素以及影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.
10
States' investment in recovery support services: An exploratory analysis.各州对康复支持服务的投资:一项探索性分析。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209343. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209343. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Let's talk about sex: helping substance abuse counsellors address HIV prevention with men who have sex with men.让我们谈谈性:帮助滥用药物辅导员与男男性接触者一起解决艾滋病毒预防问题。
Cult Health Sex. 2011 Apr;13(4):399-413. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2010.550322.

本文引用的文献

1
Organizational Network Analysis of SAMHSA's Technology Transfer Center (TTC) Network.SAMHSA 技术转让中心(TTC)网络的组织网络分析。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan;51(1):123-131. doi: 10.1007/s11414-023-09867-y. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance.技术援助评估与效果的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00314-1.
3
Integrating Telepsychiatry Into Rural Primary Care for Upstream Prevention: Feasibility Case Study of the Faith Net Program.将远程精神病学纳入农村初级保健以进行上游预防:信仰网络计划的可行性案例研究。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221097428. doi: 10.1177/00469580221097428.
4
Applying implementation science in mental health services: Technical assistance cases from the Mental Health Technology Transfer Center (MHTTC) network.应用实施科学于精神卫生服务:精神卫生技术转移中心(MHTTC)网络的技术援助案例。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Apr;75:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
A Systematic Review of Approaches for Continuous Quality Improvement Capacity-Building.系统评价持续质量改进能力建设方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):E354-E361. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001412.
6
Use of Evidence-Based Technology to Assist the Behavioral Health Workforce: A Case Study on Technology Transfer Systems.运用循证技术辅助行为健康工作者:技术转移系统的案例研究。
J Addict Nurs. 2021;32(3):197-204. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000418.
7
Addictions and Technology.成瘾与科技。
J Addict Nurs. 2021;32(3):178-179. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000415.
8
R = MC readiness building process: A practical approach to support implementation in local, state, and national settings.R=MC 准备度建设流程:支持在地方、州和国家各级实施的实用方法。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Jul;49(5):1228-1248. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22531. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
9
Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control.重新审视翻译时间:癌症控制中基于证据的实践(EBPs)的实施。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar;32(3):221-230. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01376-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review.持续质量改进在发展专业实践和改善医疗保健结果方面的有效性:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 19;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2.