Matsuura Motoki, Nagao Sachiko, Kurokawa Shoko, Tamate Masato, Akimoto Taishi, Saito Tsuyoshi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 13;13(10):2864. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102864.
: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the feasibility and outcomes of two robotic hysterectomy (da Vinci Xi™ vs. da Vinci SP™) systems without lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, and assess the postoperative recurrence rate and overall survival of patients. : A retrospective review of 84 patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (stage 1A) was conducted. Surgical procedures, patient characteristics, intraoperative measures, and postoperative outcomes were statistically analyzed. A single gynecologist performed all surgeries. Patient characteristics, average age, and body mass index showed no significant differences between the two models. The total operative time was significantly shorter with da Vinci SP™. Recurrence was identified in only one patient operated on with da Vinci Xi™. All patients were alive during analysis, with a median overall survival of 38 and 9 months for da Vinci Xi™ and da Vinci SP™, respectively. Robotic hysterectomy without lymph node dissection appears to be a safe and effective approach for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. The da Vinci SP offers the advantage of shorter operative times than the da Vinci Xi™. These findings support the consideration of robotic surgery as a viable option for selected patients.
本研究旨在评估和比较两种机器人子宫切除术(达芬奇 Xi™ 与达芬奇 SP™)系统在早期子宫内膜癌患者中不进行淋巴结清扫的可行性和结果,并评估患者的术后复发率和总生存率。对 84 例行机器人子宫内膜癌(1A 期)子宫切除术的患者进行了回顾性研究。对手术过程、患者特征、术中指标和术后结果进行了统计分析。所有手术均由一名妇科医生完成。两种型号之间的患者特征、平均年龄和体重指数无显著差异。达芬奇 SP™ 的总手术时间明显更短。仅 1 例接受达芬奇 Xi™ 手术的患者出现复发。在分析期间所有患者均存活,达芬奇 Xi™ 和达芬奇 SP™ 的中位总生存期分别为 38 个月和 9 个月。对于早期子宫内膜癌患者,不进行淋巴结清扫的机器人子宫切除术似乎是一种安全有效的方法。达芬奇 SP 比达芬奇 Xi™ 具有手术时间更短的优势。这些发现支持将机器人手术作为特定患者的可行选择。