León-Morillas Felipe, García-Marín Manuel, Corujo-Hernández Carlota, Martín Alemán María, Castellote-Caballero Yolanda, Cahalin Lawrence P, Infante-Guedes Aday, Cruz-Díaz David
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Therapy Occupational, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Guadalupe, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 17;13(10):2958. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102958.
: Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS) is prevalent among physically active individuals, highlighting the need for innovative treatment strategies beyond conventional physiotherapy. This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating flossing band therapy with standard physiotherapy, anticipating improved outcomes in pain reduction, functional ability, and patient satisfaction. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial involved 50 PFPS-diagnosed participants. They were divided into two groups: Standard Physiotherapy Group (SPG) and Flossing Band and Physiotherapy Group (FBPG), each undergoing an 8-week intervention focusing on resistance training supplemented by respective therapies. Assessment metrics included pain (VAS), strength (Dynamometry), lower limb function (LEFS), and PFPS function (AKPS) measured before and after the intervention. Significant enhancements in all outcome measures were noted for both groups, yet the FBPG exhibited notably superior improvements in pain, knee functionality, muscle strength, and lower extremity function. The FBPG demonstrated statistically significant greater efficacy in pain alleviation and strength enhancement. The addition of flossing band therapy to conventional physiotherapy presents a more effective treatment modality for PFPS, suggesting its potential to redefine therapeutic standards. Future studies should delve into the long-term impacts and mechanistic underpinnings of floss band therapy in PFPS management.
髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)在体育活动人群中很常见,这凸显了除传统物理治疗外还需要创新治疗策略。本研究调查了将肌内效贴扎疗法与标准物理治疗相结合的有效性,预计在减轻疼痛、功能能力和患者满意度方面会有更好的效果。一项双盲随机对照试验纳入了50名被诊断为PFPS的参与者。他们被分为两组:标准物理治疗组(SPG)和肌内效贴扎与物理治疗组(FBPG),每组都进行为期8周的干预,重点是阻力训练,并辅以各自的治疗方法。评估指标包括干预前后测量的疼痛(视觉模拟评分法)、力量(握力计测量)、下肢功能(下肢功能评分)和PFPS功能(髌股关节功能评分)。两组在所有结局指标上均有显著改善,但FBPG在疼痛、膝关节功能、肌肉力量和下肢功能方面的改善明显更优。FBPG在减轻疼痛和增强力量方面显示出统计学上的显著更大疗效。在传统物理治疗中加入肌内效贴扎疗法为PFPS提供了一种更有效的治疗方式,表明其有可能重新定义治疗标准。未来的研究应深入探讨肌内效贴扎疗法在PFPS管理中的长期影响和作用机制。