Enkhbileg Nyamsuren, Kim Jin Woo, Chang Seok Woo, Park Se-Hee, Cho Kyung Mo, Lee Yoon
Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 14210, Mongolia.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 7 Jukheon-gil, Gangneung 25457, Republic of Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2024 May 15;17(10):2366. doi: 10.3390/ma17102366.
This study aimed to compare the nanoleakage of retrograde fillings with premixed calcium silicate-based putty and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), using two different techniques (traditional and Lid). Sixty-four extracted human teeth were decoronated, then root canals and ends were instrumented for retrograde filling and divided into four groups according to the retrograde filling technique: the traditional and the Lid technique. Each group (n = 15) was filled with Ceraseal + Well-Root putty, Well-Root putty, Ceraseal + ProRoot MTA, and ProRoot MTA. The nanoleakage was evaluated using the Nanoflow device (IB Systems) on days 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30. Data were collected twice per second at the nanoscale (nL/s) and calculated after archiving the stabilization of fluid flow. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analysis. All groups showed enhanced sealing ability over time. Regardless of filling materials, the Well-Root putty, Ceraseal+Well-Root putty, and Ceraseal+ProRoot MTA groups indicated less nanoleakage than the ProRoot MTA group in the first week of evaluation ( < 0.05). Although all groups did not show significant differences after 2 weeks, the Ceraseal+ProRoot MTA group leaked less than ProRoot MTA on Days 3 and 7 ( < 0.05). The scanning electron microscopic examined good adaptation to the cavity wall, which was similar to nanoleakage results. Premixed calcium silicate-based putty retrograde filling material alone and using the "lid technique" were shown to be faster and less prone to nanoleakage when compared to MTA.
本研究旨在使用两种不同技术(传统技术和Lid技术)比较预混硅酸钙基糊剂与矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)进行倒充填时的纳米渗漏情况。64颗拔除的人牙被截冠,然后对根管和根尖进行倒充填预备,并根据倒充填技术分为四组:传统技术组和Lid技术组。每组(n = 15)分别用Ceraseal + Well-Root糊剂、Well-Root糊剂、Ceraseal + ProRoot MTA和ProRoot MTA进行充填。在第1、3、7、15和30天使用Nanoflow设备(IB Systems)评估纳米渗漏情况。在纳米尺度(nL/s)下每秒收集两次数据,并在流体流动稳定存档后进行计算。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。所有组的封闭能力均随时间增强。在评估的第一周,无论充填材料如何,Well-Root糊剂组、Ceraseal+Well-Root糊剂组和Ceraseal+ProRoot MTA组的纳米渗漏均少于ProRoot MTA组(P<0.05)。虽然2周后所有组均未显示出显著差异,但在第3天和第7天,Ceraseal+ProRoot MTA组的渗漏少于ProRoot MTA组(P<0.05)。扫描电子显微镜检查显示材料与洞壁贴合良好,这与纳米渗漏结果相似。与MTA相比,单独使用预混硅酸钙基糊剂作为倒充填材料并采用“Lid技术”时,速度更快且纳米渗漏更少。