Tiara Marita Restie, Prayuda Chrisan Bimo, Maulidya Tara Titian, Djauhari Hofiya, Suhendar Dadang, Wisaksana Rudi, Hamijoyo Laniyati, Supriyadi Rudi, Indrati Agnes Rengga, Alisjahbana Bachti
Research Center for Care and Control of Infectious Disease, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40161, Indonesia.
Mayapada Hospital Buah Batu, Bandung 40266, Indonesia.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 20;12(5):558. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050558.
The presence of the anti-SARS-CoV-2-RBD antibody (anti-RBD) prevents severe COVID-19. We aimed to determine the accuracy of a point-of-care anti-RBD testing implemented in persons living with HIV (PLWH), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We enrolled 182 non-comorbid subjects and 335 comorbid subjects (PLWH, SLE, CKD) to test the anti-RBD assay compared to the surrogate viral neutralization test (sVNT) as the reference test. We performed linear correlation analysis between anti-RBD and sVNT, along with an ROC analysis to ascertain the anti-RBD cutoff at 30%, 60%, and 90% inhibition of sVNT, to calculate accuracy. The correlations between anti-RBD and sVNT among all groups were excellent, with R = 0.7903, R = 0.7843, and R = 0.8153 among the non-comorbid, SLE, and CKD groups, respectively, and with significantly higher correlation among the PLWH group (R = 0.8877; -value = 0.0072) compared to the non-comorbid group. The accuracy of the anti-RBD test among the PLWH and CKD groups was similar to that among the non-comorbid group but showed lower sensitivity in the SLE group ( = 0.000014). The specificity of the test remained high in all groups. In conclusion, the anti-RBD test had excellent correlation with the sVNT. The persistently high specificity in all groups suggests that this test can be reliably utilized to detect the presence of low neutralization capacity, prompting additional vaccination.
抗SARS-CoV-2受体结合域抗体(抗RBD)的存在可预防重症新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)。我们旨在确定在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者、系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者和慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中实施的即时检测抗RBD检测的准确性。我们招募了182名无合并症受试者和335名合并症受试者(HIV感染者、SLE患者、CKD患者),将抗RBD检测与作为参考检测的替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)进行比较。我们对抗RBD和sVNT进行了线性相关分析,并进行了ROC分析,以确定在sVNT抑制率为30%、60%和90%时的抗RBD临界值,从而计算准确性。所有组中抗RBD与sVNT之间的相关性都很好,无合并症组、SLE组和CKD组的R值分别为0.7903、0.7843和0.8153,与无合并症组相比,HIV感染者组的相关性显著更高(R = 0.8877;P值 = 0.0072)。HIV感染者组和CKD组中抗RBD检测的准确性与无合并症组相似,但在SLE组中敏感性较低(P = 0.000014)。该检测在所有组中的特异性仍然很高。总之,抗RBD检测与sVNT具有良好的相关性。所有组中持续较高的特异性表明,该检测可可靠地用于检测低中和能力的存在,从而促使进行额外的疫苗接种。