• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型荧光侧向流动免疫分析法(LFIA)快速检测和定量感染个体中总抗 SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD 结合抗体的性能评估。

Performance evaluation of novel fluorescent-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for rapid detection and quantification of total anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD binding antibodies in infected individuals.

机构信息

Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar.

Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar; Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2022 May;118:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.052. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.052
PMID:35231609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8882034/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A vast majority of the commercially available lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is used to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies qualitatively. Recently, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) test was developed for quantitative measurement of the total binding antibody units (BAUs) (BAU/mL) against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (S-RBD).

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the fluorescence LFIA Finecare 2019-nCoV S-RBD test along with its reader (Model No.: FS-113).

METHODS

Plasma from 150 reverse trancriptase-PCR (RT-PCR)-confirmed positive individuals and 100 prepandemic samples were tested by Fincare to access sensitivity and specificity. For qualitative and quantitative validation of the FinCare measurements, BAU/mL results of FinCare were compared with results of 2 reference assays: the surrogate virus-neutralizing test (sVNT, GenScript Biotech, USA) and the VIDAS®3 automated assay (BioMérieux, France).

RESULTS

Finecare showed 92% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared with PCR. Cohen's Kappa statistic denoted moderate and excellent agreement with sVNT and VIDAS®3, with values being 0.557 (95% CI: 0.32-0.78) and 0.731 (95% CI: 0.51-0.95), respectively. A strong correlation was observed between Finecare/sVNT (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001) and Finecare/VIDAS®3 (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Finecare is a reliable assay and can be used as a surrogate to assess binding and neutralizing antibody response after infection or vaccination, particularly in none or small laboratory settings.

摘要

背景

绝大多数市售侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)用于定性检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。最近,开发了一种新型荧光基于侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)测试,用于定量测量针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白受体结合域(S-RBD)的总结合抗体单位(BAU)(BAU/mL)。

目的

本研究旨在评估荧光 LFIA Finecare 2019-nCoV S-RBD 测试及其阅读器(型号:FS-113)的性能。

方法

使用 Fincare 测试了 150 例逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊阳性个体和 100 例大流行前样本,以评估灵敏度和特异性。为了对 Finecare 的测量进行定性和定量验证,将 Finecare 的 BAU/mL 结果与两种参考测定法的结果进行比较:替代病毒中和试验(sVNT,美国 GenScript Biotech)和 VIDAS®3 自动化测定法(法国 BioMérieux)。

结果

与 PCR 相比,Finecare 的敏感性为 92%,特异性为 100%。科恩氏 Kappa 统计数据表示与 sVNT 和 VIDAS®3 具有中等和极好的一致性,值分别为 0.557(95%CI:0.32-0.78)和 0.731(95%CI:0.51-0.95)。Finecare/sVNT(r=0.7,p<0.0001)和 Finecare/VIDAS®3(r=0.8,p<0.0001)之间观察到强相关性。

结论

Finecare 是一种可靠的测定法,可用于评估感染或接种疫苗后的结合和中和抗体反应,特别是在无或小型实验室环境中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/8882034/c90ff85070ef/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/8882034/ce8da3b4bdeb/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/8882034/c90ff85070ef/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/8882034/ce8da3b4bdeb/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/8882034/c90ff85070ef/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of novel fluorescent-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for rapid detection and quantification of total anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD binding antibodies in infected individuals.新型荧光侧向流动免疫分析法(LFIA)快速检测和定量感染个体中总抗 SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD 结合抗体的性能评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 May;118:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.052. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Validation of a Novel Fluorescent Lateral Flow Assay for Rapid Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Total Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD Binding Antibody Units (BAU) from Plasma or Fingerstick Whole-Blood of COVID-19 Vaccinees.一种新型荧光侧向流动分析法的验证,用于对新冠疫苗接种者血浆或指尖全血中总抗SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD结合抗体单位(BAU)进行快速定性和定量评估
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 15;10(8):1318. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081318.
3
Performance of the rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay targeting total antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain in comparison to the neutralization assay.针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白受体结合域的总抗体的快速高通量自动化电化学发光免疫分析与中和测定的比较性能。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Jun;139:104820. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104820. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
4
Can commercial automated immunoassays be utilized to predict neutralizing antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection? A comparative study between three different assays.商业自动化免疫分析可否用于预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的中和抗体?三种不同检测方法的比较研究。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2021 Jul 30;26(7):198-206. doi: 10.52586/4934.
5
Validation of a quantitative lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA)-based point-of-care (POC) rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.基于定量侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)的即时检测(POC)SARS-CoV-2中和抗体快速检测方法的验证
Arch Virol. 2022 May;167(5):1285-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05422-w. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
6
Development of receptor binding domain-based double-antigen sandwich lateral flow immunoassay for the detection and evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in clinical sera samples compared with the conventional virus neutralization test.基于受体结合域的双抗原夹心侧向流动免疫分析的开发,用于检测和评估临床血清样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体,与传统的病毒中和试验进行比较。
Talanta. 2023 Apr 1;255:124200. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124200. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).评估三种免疫测定法(Euroimmun 和 Abbott 的两种自动化免疫测定法以及 NG Biotech 的一种快速侧向流动免疫测定法)用于诊断 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Evaluation of the correlation between the access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test.评估 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG II 抗体检测与 SARS-CoV-2 替代病毒中和试验之间的相关性。
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):335-341. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27338. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
9
Diagnostic performance between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassays including binding-specific antibody and surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT).在包括结合特异性抗体和替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)在内的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学免疫分析中,内部和商业检测之间的诊断性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26202-1.
10
Evaluation of commercially available fully automated and ELISA-based assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.评估市售的全自动和基于 ELISA 的检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体的方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):19020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21317-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pushing the Limits of Lateral Flow Immunoassay by Digital SERS for the Ultralow Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus.通过数字表面增强拉曼光谱推动侧向流动免疫分析的极限以实现对SARS-CoV-2病毒的超痕量检测
Small Sci. 2024 Aug 10;4(11):2400259. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202400259. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Advances in Surrogate Neutralization Tests for High-Throughput Screening and the Point-of-Care.用于高通量筛选和即时检测的替代中和试验进展
Anal Chem. 2025 Mar 18;97(10):5407-5423. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00666. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
3
Lateral flow assays: Progress and evolution of recent trends in point-of-care applications.

本文引用的文献

1
WHO international standard for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to determine markers of protection.世界卫生组织用于确定保护标志物的新型冠状病毒2抗体国际标准。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Feb;3(2):e81-e82. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00307-4. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
2
Meta-analysis of the clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and antibody tests up to 22 August 2020.截至 2020 年 8 月 22 日的商业 SARS-CoV-2 核酸和抗体检测临床性能的荟萃分析。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(45). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.45.2001675.
3
Can commercial automated immunoassays be utilized to predict neutralizing antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection? A comparative study between three different assays.
侧向流动分析:即时护理应用中近期趋势的进展与演变
Mater Today Bio. 2024 Aug 6;28:101188. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101188. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Accuracy of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody in Comparison with Surrogate Viral Neutralization Test in Persons Living with HIV, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Chronic Kidney Disease.与替代病毒中和试验相比,抗SARS-CoV-2抗体在HIV感染者、系统性红斑狼疮患者和慢性肾脏病患者中的准确性。
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 20;12(5):558. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050558.
5
Rapid assays of SARS-CoV-2 virus and noble biosensors by nanomaterials.利用纳米材料对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒和新型生物传感器进行快速检测。
Nano Converg. 2024 Jan 8;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40580-023-00408-z.
6
Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis.血液透析终末期肾病患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的抗体反应
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 1;11(12):1802. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121802.
7
A Comparative Evaluation of HbA1c Measurement Methods and Their Implications for Diabetes Management.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测方法的比较评估及其对糖尿病管理的意义
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;13(22):3449. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223449.
8
High-sensitive detection and quantitation of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from capillary/fingerstick and venepuncture whole-blood using fluorescence-based rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA).使用基于荧光的快速侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)从毛细血管/指尖采血和静脉穿刺全血中高灵敏度检测和定量促甲状腺激素(TSH)。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 5;9(10):e20589. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20589. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Level Is Associated with a History of COVID-19 Infection and mRNA Vaccination in Patients with Diabetes.抗SARS-CoV-2抗体水平与糖尿病患者的COVID-19感染史和mRNA疫苗接种情况相关。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 27;11(9):1424. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11091424.
10
High Levels of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) Antibodies One Year Post Booster Vaccinations among Hospital Workers in Indonesia: Was the Second Booster Needed?印度尼西亚医院工作人员加强疫苗接种一年后抗SARS-CoV-2受体结合域(RBD)抗体水平:是否需要第二次加强针?
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;11(8):1300. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081300.
商业自动化免疫分析可否用于预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的中和抗体?三种不同检测方法的比较研究。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2021 Jul 30;26(7):198-206. doi: 10.52586/4934.
4
Epidemiology of SARS-CoV2 in Qatar's primary care population aged 10 years and above.卡塔尔 10 岁及以上初级保健人群中 SARS-CoV2 的流行病学。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06251-z.
5
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces sustained humoral immune responses in convalescent patients following symptomatic COVID-19.SARS-CoV-2 感染会在有症状的 COVID-19 康复患者中诱导出持续的体液免疫反应。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 22;12(1):1813. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22034-1.
6
Evaluation of Antibody Response in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients and Diagnostic Assessment of New IgM/IgG ELISA Kits.有症状和无症状COVID-19患者抗体反应的评估及新型IgM/IgG ELISA试剂盒的诊断评估
Pathogens. 2021 Feb 3;10(2):161. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020161.
7
Diagnostic Efficiency of Three Fully Automated Serology Assays and Their Correlation with a Novel Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 Individuals.三种全自动血清学检测方法在有症状和无症状的新冠病毒感染者中的诊断效率及其与新型替代病毒中和试验的相关性
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 25;9(2):245. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020245.
8
Performance Characteristics of the Vidas SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Serological Assays.Vidas SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 血清学检测的性能特征。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02292-20.
9
Evaluating 10 Commercially Available SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Serological Tests by Use of the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) Method.采用 STARD(诊断准确性研究报告标准)方法评估 10 种市售 SARS-CoV-2 快速血清学检测试剂。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jan 21;59(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02342-20.
10
Development, performance evaluation, and clinical application of a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Test Kit based on automated fluorescence immunoassay.基于自动化荧光免疫分析的快速 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 检测试剂盒的开发、性能评估和临床应用。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2838-2847. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26696. Epub 2021 Mar 1.