• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济不平等和指南遵循对急性胆源性胰腺炎患者临床结局的影响。一项国际多中心队列研究。

The influence of socioeconomic inequity and guidelines compliance on clinical outcomes of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. An international multicentric cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Italy.

Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2024 Aug;26(8):1022-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.001
PMID:38796347
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is lack of data on the association between socioeconomic factors, guidelines compliance and clinical outcomes among patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP).

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of the international MANCTRA-1 registry evaluating the impact of regional disparities as indicated by the Human Development Index (HDI), and guideline compliance on ABP clinical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify prognostic factors associated with mortality and readmission.

RESULTS

Among 5313 individuals from 151 centres across 42 countries marked disparities in comorbid conditions, ABP severity, and medical procedure usage were observed. Patients from lower HDI countries had higher guideline non-compliance (p < 0.001) and mortality (5.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.019) in comparison with very high HDI countries. On adjusted analysis, ASA score (OR 1.810, p = 0.037), severe ABP (OR 2.735, p < 0.001), infected necrosis (OR 2.225, p = 0.006), organ failure (OR 4.511, p = 0.001) and guideline non-compliance (OR 2.554, p = 0.002 and OR 2.178, p = 0.015) were associated with increased mortality. HDI was a critical socio-economic factor affecting both mortality (OR 2.452, p = 0.007) and readmission (OR 1.542, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

These data highlight the importance of collaborative research to characterise challenges and disparities in global ABP management. Less developed regions with lower HDI scores showed lower adherence to clinical guidelines and higher rates of mortality and recurrence.

摘要

背景

急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)患者的社会经济因素、指南依从性与临床结局之间的关联数据匮乏。

方法

对评估地域差异(以人类发展指数(HDI)表示)以及指南依从性对 ABP 临床结局影响的国际 MANCTRA-1 注册研究进行事后分析。采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与死亡率和再入院相关的预后因素。

结果

在来自 42 个国家 151 个中心的 5313 名患者中,观察到合并症、ABP 严重程度和医疗程序使用方面存在明显差异。与 HDI 极高的国家相比,来自 HDI 较低国家的患者指南依从性较差(p<0.001),死亡率较高(5.0% vs. 3.2%,p=0.019)。在调整分析中,ASA 评分(OR 1.810,p=0.037)、重度 ABP(OR 2.735,p<0.001)、感染性坏死(OR 2.225,p=0.006)、器官衰竭(OR 4.511,p=0.001)和指南不依从(OR 2.554,p=0.002 和 OR 2.178,p=0.015)与死亡率增加相关。HDI 是一个关键的社会经济因素,影响死亡率(OR 2.452,p=0.007)和再入院率(OR 1.542,p=0.046)。

结论

这些数据强调了开展协作研究以明确全球 ABP 管理面临的挑战和差异的重要性。HDI 评分较低的欠发达地区对临床指南的依从性较低,死亡率和复发率较高。

相似文献

1
The influence of socioeconomic inequity and guidelines compliance on clinical outcomes of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. An international multicentric cohort study.社会经济不平等和指南遵循对急性胆源性胰腺炎患者临床结局的影响。一项国际多中心队列研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Aug;26(8):1022-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Timing of Cholecystectomy After Moderate and Severe Acute Biliary Pancreatitis.中重度急性胆源性胰腺炎胆囊切除术时机选择。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Oct 1;158(10):e233660. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3660. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Mild acute biliary pancreatitis: still a surgical disease. A post-hoc analysis of the MANCTRA-1 international study.轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎:仍是一种外科疾病。MANCTRA-1国际研究的事后分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 17;51(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02748-9.
4
Failure to comply with NCCN guidelines for the management of pancreatic cancer compromises outcomes.不符合 NCCN 胰腺癌管理指南会影响治疗效果。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Aug;14(8):539-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00496.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
5
Acute biliary pancreatitis: focus on recurrence rate and costs when current guidelines are not complied.急性胆源性胰腺炎:聚焦于未遵循现行指南时的复发率及成本
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;52(3):264-269. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1243258. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis is Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the Elderly: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.急性胆源性胰腺炎与老年人不良预后相关:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;53(7):e291-e297. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001108.
7
Evolving trends in interventions and outcomes for acute biliary pancreatitis during pregnancy: A two-decade analysis.妊娠期急性胆源性胰腺炎干预措施及结局的演变趋势:一项二十年分析
Pancreatology. 2025 Mar;25(2):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.006. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
8
Regional Variation in 30-Day Ischemic Stroke Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries Treated in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.参与“遵循卒中指南”项目的医院中接受治疗的医疗保险受益人的30天缺血性卒中结局的地区差异
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003604.
9
Endoscopic intervention and cholecystectomy in pregnant women with acute biliary pancreatitis decrease early readmissions.内镜介入和胆囊切除术可降低妊娠合并急性胆源性胰腺炎患者的早期再入院率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1169-1177.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
10
Index admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis favorably impacts outcomes of hospitalization in cirrhosis.因急性胆源性胰腺炎行胆囊切除术入院指数有利于改善肝硬化患者住院结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;35(2):284-290. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14775. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pancreatitis in Adults Aged 20-54 Years, 1990-2021: Insight from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990 - 2021年20 - 54岁成年人胰腺炎的全球、区域和国家负担:来自《2021年全球疾病负担研究》的见解
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09247-w.
2
Machine learning for the rElapse risk eValuation in acute biliary pancreatitis: The deep learning MINERVA study protocol.用于急性胆源性胰腺炎复发风险评估的机器学习:深度学习MINERVA研究方案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 3;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00594-7.