Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 8499000, Israel.
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 Jun;39(6):548-557. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 24.
Systematic evidence syntheses (systematic reviews and maps) summarize knowledge and are used to support decisions and policies in a variety of applied fields, from medicine and public health to biodiversity conservation. However, conducting these exercises in conservation is often expensive and slow, which can impede their use and hamper progress in addressing the current biodiversity crisis. With the explosive growth of large language models (LLMs) and other forms of artificial intelligence (AI), we discuss here the promise and perils associated with their use. We conclude that, when judiciously used, AI has the potential to speed up and hopefully improve the process of evidence synthesis, which can be particularly useful for underfunded applied fields, such as conservation science.
系统证据综合(系统评价和图谱)总结知识,并用于支持各种应用领域的决策和政策,从医学和公共卫生到生物多样性保护。然而,在保护领域进行这些工作往往成本高昂且缓慢,这可能会阻碍它们的使用,并阻碍解决当前生物多样性危机的进展。随着大型语言模型 (LLM) 和其他形式的人工智能 (AI) 的爆炸式增长,我们在这里讨论了它们的使用所带来的希望和风险。我们的结论是,当明智地使用时,人工智能有可能加快并有望改善证据综合的过程,这对于资金不足的应用领域(如保护科学)尤其有用。