Politi Mary C, Myckatyn Terence M, Cooksey Krista, Olsen Margaret A, Smith Rachel M, Foraker Randi, Parrish Katelyn, Phommasathit Crystal, Brock Guy, Janse Sarah, Guglielmino Janine, Peled Anne, Mills Paul B, Jackson Sherrill, Lee Clara N
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ann Surg. 2024 May 27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006354.
To implement the BREASTChoice decision tool into the electronic health record and evaluate its effectiveness.
BREASTChoice , is a multilevel decision tool that: 1) educates patients about breast reconstruction; 2) estimates personalized risk of complications; 3) clarifies patient preferences; and 4) informs clinicians about patients' risk and preferences.
A multisite randomized controlled trial enrolled adult women with stage 0-III breast malignancy undergoing mastectomy. Participants were randomized to BREASTChoice or a control website. A survey assessed knowledge, preferences, decisional conflict, shared decision-making, preferred treatment, and usability. We conducted intent-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) analyses (those randomized to BREASTChoice who accessed the tool), and stratified analyses.
23/25 eligible clinicians enrolled. 369/761 (48%) contacted patients enrolled and were randomized. Patients' average age was 51 years; 15% were older than 65. BREASTChoice participants had higher knowledge than control participants (ITT: mean 70.6 vs. 67.4, P =0.08; PP: mean 71.4 vs. 67.4, P =0.03), especially when stratified by site (ITT: P =0.04, PP: P =0.01), age (ITT: P =0.04, PP: P =0.02), and race (ITT: P =0.04, PP: P =0.01). BREASTChoice did not improve decisional conflict, match between preferences and treatment, or shared decision-making. In PP analyses, fewer high-risk patients using BREASTChoice chose reconstruction. BREASTChoice had high usability.
BREASTChoice is a novel decision tool incorporating risk prediction, patient education, and clinician engagement. Patients using BREASTChoice had higher knowledge; older adults and those from racially minoritized backgrounds especially benefitted. There was no impact on other decision outcomes. Future studies should overcome implementation barriers and specifically examine decision outcomes among high-risk patients.
将BREASTChoice决策工具应用于电子健康记录并评估其有效性。
BREASTChoice是一种多层次决策工具,它能够:1)对患者进行乳房重建方面的教育;2)估计个性化的并发症风险;3)明确患者偏好;4)向临床医生告知患者的风险和偏好。
一项多中心随机对照试验纳入了接受乳房切除术的0-III期成年女性乳腺癌患者。参与者被随机分配至BREASTChoice组或对照网站组。一项调查评估了知识、偏好、决策冲突、共同决策、首选治疗方法及可用性。我们进行了意向性分析(ITT)、符合方案分析(PP,即那些被随机分配至BREASTChoice组且访问了该工具的患者)以及分层分析。
25名合格临床医生中有23名参与。761名患者中有369名(48%)被联系并随机分组。患者的平均年龄为51岁;15%的患者年龄超过65岁。BREASTChoice组参与者的知识水平高于对照组(ITT:均值70.6对67.4,P =0.08;PP:均值71.4对67.4,P =0.03),尤其是按地点分层时(ITT:P =0.04,PP:P =0.01)、年龄分层时(ITT:P =0.04,PP:P =0.02)以及种族分层时(ITT:P =0.04,PP:P =0.01)。BREASTChoice并未改善决策冲突、偏好与治疗的匹配度或共同决策情况。在符合方案分析中,使用BREASTChoice的高危患者中选择重建的人数较少。BREASTChoice具有较高的可用性。
BREASTChoice是一种新型决策工具,融合了风险预测、患者教育及临床医生参与。使用BREASTChoice的患者知识水平更高;老年人及来自少数族裔背景的患者尤其受益。对其他决策结果没有影响。未来的研究应克服实施障碍,并特别研究高危患者的决策结果。