Schmiedebach Heinz-Peter
Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinstraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2024 Jul;95(7):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01657-x. Epub 2024 May 27.
With the emergence of an early psychiatry around 1800, a number of questions arose on dealing with a group of persons whose "alien", irritating and disruptive behavior was considered to be a phenomenon of being sick. In the context of the growing importance of human rights, the term humanitarianism attained a high relevance as the reference for early psychiatrists. Based on historical sources it is shown that despite a multitude of psychiatric beliefs on humanitarianism the established psychiatric practice was dominated by patriarchal order regimes up to the first decade of the twentieth century, later superimposed by the challenges of somatophysiological and experimental research as well as perceptions of biological racism. The associated new ethical questions were partially addressed within psychiatry but did not prevent an increase in the assessment of the mentally ill as "inferior".
随着1800年左右早期精神病学的出现,出现了一些关于如何对待一群人的问题,这些人的“怪异”、令人恼火和具有破坏性的行为被视为一种疾病现象。在人权日益重要的背景下,人道主义一词作为早期精神病医生的参考依据具有高度相关性。基于历史资料表明,尽管在人道主义问题上存在众多精神病学观点,但直到20世纪的第一个十年,既定的精神病学实践一直由父权秩序制度主导,后来又受到躯体生理学和实验研究的挑战以及生物种族主义观念的影响。相关的新伦理问题在精神病学领域得到了部分解决,但这并没有阻止将精神病人评估为“低等人”的情况增加。