Suppr超能文献

重新思考主动老龄化的健康推荐系统:基于自主性的伦理分析。

Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, 62100, Macerata, Italy.

Institute for Technology and Global Health, PathCheck Foundation, 955 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 May 27;30(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z.

Abstract

Health Recommender Systems are promising Articial-Intelligence-based tools endowing healthy lifestyles and therapy adherence in healthcare and medicine. Among the most supported areas, it is worth mentioning active aging. However, current HRS supporting AA raise ethical challenges that still need to be properly formalized and explored. This study proposes to rethink HRS for AA through an autonomy-based ethical analysis. In particular, a brief overview of the HRS' technical aspects allows us to shed light on the ethical risks and challenges they might raise on individuals' well-being as they age. Moreover, the study proposes a categorization, understanding, and possible preventive/mitigation actions for the elicited risks and challenges through rethinking the AI ethics core principle of autonomy. Finally, elaborating on autonomy-related ethical theories, the paper proposes an autonomy-based ethical framework and how it can foster the development of autonomy-enabling HRS for AA.

摘要

健康推荐系统是一种有前途的人工智能工具,能够为医疗保健和医学领域赋予健康的生活方式和治疗依从性。在最受支持的领域中,值得一提的是积极老龄化。然而,目前支持 AA 的 HRS 引发了一些伦理挑战,这些挑战仍需要得到适当的形式化和探索。本研究通过基于自主性的伦理分析来重新思考 HRS 对 AA 的应用。具体来说,简要概述 HRS 的技术方面,可以让我们了解到随着年龄的增长,它们可能会给个人的福祉带来的伦理风险和挑战。此外,通过重新思考人工智能伦理核心原则自主性,本文提出了一种对所引出的风险和挑战进行分类、理解和可能的预防/缓解措施的方法。最后,本文详细阐述了与自主性相关的伦理理论,提出了一个基于自主性的伦理框架,以及它如何能够促进支持 AA 的自主性使能 HRS 的发展。

相似文献

1
Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 May 27;30(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z.
3
Speech changes in old age: Methodological considerations for speech-based discrimination of healthy ageing and Alzheimer's disease.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):13-37. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12888. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Serial Living Solid Organ Donation: An Ethical Analysis.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70192. doi: 10.1111/jep.70192.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Occupational therapy for persons with cognitive impairments.
Ger Med Sci. 2023 Apr 4;21:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000316. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics Principles for Artificial Intelligence-Based Telemedicine for Public Health.
Am J Public Health. 2023 May;113(5):577-584. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307225. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
A global taxonomy of interpretable AI: unifying the terminology for the technical and social sciences.
Artif Intell Rev. 2023;56(4):3473-3504. doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10256-8. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Recommender systems for mental health apps: advantages and ethical challenges.
AI Soc. 2022 Jan 17:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01322-w.
6
Cohort and Trajectory Analysis in Multi-Agent Support Systems for Cancer Survivors.
J Med Syst. 2021 Nov 11;45(12):109. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01770-3.
7
Health Recommender Systems: Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e18035. doi: 10.2196/18035.
8
Are we ready for artificial intelligence health monitoring in elder care?
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01764-9.
9
The disruptive power of Artificial Intelligence. Ethical aspects of gerontechnology in elderly care.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Nov/Dec;91:104186. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104186. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1771-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验