Department of Political Sciences, Communication, and International Relations, University of Macerata, 62100, Macerata, Italy.
Institute for Technology and Global Health, PathCheck Foundation, 955 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 May 27;30(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z.
Health Recommender Systems are promising Articial-Intelligence-based tools endowing healthy lifestyles and therapy adherence in healthcare and medicine. Among the most supported areas, it is worth mentioning active aging. However, current HRS supporting AA raise ethical challenges that still need to be properly formalized and explored. This study proposes to rethink HRS for AA through an autonomy-based ethical analysis. In particular, a brief overview of the HRS' technical aspects allows us to shed light on the ethical risks and challenges they might raise on individuals' well-being as they age. Moreover, the study proposes a categorization, understanding, and possible preventive/mitigation actions for the elicited risks and challenges through rethinking the AI ethics core principle of autonomy. Finally, elaborating on autonomy-related ethical theories, the paper proposes an autonomy-based ethical framework and how it can foster the development of autonomy-enabling HRS for AA.
健康推荐系统是一种有前途的人工智能工具,能够为医疗保健和医学领域赋予健康的生活方式和治疗依从性。在最受支持的领域中,值得一提的是积极老龄化。然而,目前支持 AA 的 HRS 引发了一些伦理挑战,这些挑战仍需要得到适当的形式化和探索。本研究通过基于自主性的伦理分析来重新思考 HRS 对 AA 的应用。具体来说,简要概述 HRS 的技术方面,可以让我们了解到随着年龄的增长,它们可能会给个人的福祉带来的伦理风险和挑战。此外,通过重新思考人工智能伦理核心原则自主性,本文提出了一种对所引出的风险和挑战进行分类、理解和可能的预防/缓解措施的方法。最后,本文详细阐述了与自主性相关的伦理理论,提出了一个基于自主性的伦理框架,以及它如何能够促进支持 AA 的自主性使能 HRS 的发展。