• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors.如何设计造福社会的人工智能:七个关键因素。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1771-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Responsible nudging for social good: new healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants.负责任地推动社会进步:人工智能驱动的数字个人助理的新医疗保健技能。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Mar;25(1):11-22. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10062-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.
4
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.促进健康的人工智能:伦理文献的范围综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Surgery: Ethical Dilemmas and Open Issues.人工智能与外科手术:伦理困境与待解问题。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Aug 1;235(2):268-275. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000242. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Mapping research strands of ethics of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric and content analysis.绘制医疗人工智能伦理研究脉络:文献计量与内容分析。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104660. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact.人工智能造福社会:释放积极影响的机遇。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 18;11(1):2468. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z.
8
Multi Scale Ethics-Why We Need  to Consider the Ethics of AI in Healthcare at Different Scales.多尺度伦理——为何我们需要在不同尺度上考虑医疗 AI 的伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Nov 28;28(6):63. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00396-z.
9
Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles.将价值敏感设计映射到人工智能促进社会公益的原则上。
AI Ethics. 2021;1(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review.将人工智能转向医疗保健领域的责任:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114782. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical theories, governance models, and strategic frameworks for responsible AI adoption and organizational success.负责任的人工智能应用及组织成功的伦理理论、治理模式和战略框架。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 16;8:1619029. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1619029. eCollection 2025.
2
Prudential reasons for designing entitled chatbots: How robot "rights" can improve human well-being.设计有资格的聊天机器人的审慎理由:机器人“权利”如何能增进人类福祉。
AI Ethics. 2025;5(4):3791-3802. doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00676-x. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.IMI-近视管理仪器
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jul 1;66(9):7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.9.7.
4
Evaluating the normative implications of national and international artificial intelligence policies for Sustainable Development Goal 3: good health and well-being.评估国家和国际人工智能政策对可持续发展目标3(良好健康与福祉)的规范影响。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 29;3(6):qxaf108. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf108. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Ethical and legal considerations in healthcare AI: innovation and policy for safe and fair use.医疗保健人工智能中的伦理和法律考量:安全公平使用的创新与政策
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 14;12(5):241873. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241873. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Justifying Our Credences in the Trustworthiness of AI Systems: A Reliabilistic Approach.为人工智能系统的可靠性可信度辩护:一种可靠主义的方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Nov 21;30(6):55. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00522-z.
7
Ethical considerations of public health surveillance in the age of the internet of things technologies: A perspective.物联网技术时代公共卫生监测的伦理考量:一种视角
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 5;10:20552076241296578. doi: 10.1177/20552076241296578. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Assist me or replace me? Uncovering the influence of AI awareness on employees' counterproductive work behaviors.协助我还是取代我?揭示人工智能意识对员工反生产工作行为的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 3;12:1449561. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449561. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparative analysis of real-world data of frequent treatment sequences in metastatic prostate cancer.转移性前列腺癌频繁治疗序列的真实世界数据对比分析
Curr Urol. 2024 Jun;18(2):104-109. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000217. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
10
Rethinking Health Recommender Systems for Active Aging: An Autonomy-Based Ethical Analysis.重新思考主动老龄化的健康推荐系统:基于自主性的伦理分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 May 27;30(3):22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00479-z.

本文引用的文献

1
AI for Not Bad.人工智能用于改善状况。 (不过原英文表述比较奇怪,可能有更准确的语境来理解其确切意思)
Front Big Data. 2019 Sep 11;2:32. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00032. eCollection 2019.
2
The grand challenges of .···的重大挑战。
Sci Robot. 2018 Jan 31;3(14). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650.
3
AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.《人工智能造福人类——良好人工智能社会的伦理框架:机遇、风险、原则与建议》
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Clinical applications of machine learning algorithms: beyond the black box.机器学习算法的临床应用:超越黑箱效应
BMJ. 2019 Mar 12;364:l886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l886.
5
A mathematical-descriptor of tumor-mesoscopic-structure from computed-tomography images annotates prognostic- and molecular-phenotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.从计算机断层扫描图像中提取的肿瘤介观结构的数学描述符可标注上皮性卵巢癌的预后和分子表型。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 15;10(1):764. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08718-9.
6
Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions.人工智能犯罪:可预见威胁及解决方案的跨学科分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):89-120. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Privacy in the age of medical big data.医疗大数据时代的隐私问题。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
How AI can be a force for good.人工智能如何成为一股向善的力量。
Science. 2018 Aug 24;361(6404):751-752. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5991.
9
How should we regulate artificial intelligence?我们应该如何规范人工智能?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 Sep 13;376(2128). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0360.
10
Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race.规范人工智能以避免网络军备竞赛。
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7701):296-298. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04602-6.

如何设计造福社会的人工智能:七个关键因素。

How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors.

机构信息

Digital Ethics Lab, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1771-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5
PMID:32246245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7286860/
Abstract

The idea of artificial intelligence for social good (henceforth AI4SG) is gaining traction within information societies in general and the AI community in particular. It has the potential to tackle social problems through the development of AI-based solutions. Yet, to date, there is only limited understanding of what makes AI socially good in theory, what counts as AI4SG in practice, and how to reproduce its initial successes in terms of policies. This article addresses this gap by identifying seven ethical factors that are essential for future AI4SG initiatives. The analysis is supported by 27 case examples of AI4SG projects. Some of these factors are almost entirely novel to AI, while the significance of other factors is heightened by the use of AI. From each of these factors, corresponding best practices are formulated which, subject to context and balance, may serve as preliminary guidelines to ensure that well-designed AI is more likely to serve the social good.

摘要

人工智能促进社会公益(简称 AI4SG)的理念在信息社会中得到了广泛关注,尤其是在人工智能社区中。它有潜力通过开发基于人工智能的解决方案来解决社会问题。然而,迄今为止,人们对理论上什么样的人工智能才是有益社会的、实践中什么样的人工智能才是 AI4SG 以及如何在政策层面上复制其最初的成功,只有有限的理解。本文通过确定未来 AI4SG 计划所必需的七个伦理因素来填补这一空白。这项分析得到了 27 个 AI4SG 项目案例的支持。其中一些因素几乎完全是人工智能所特有的,而其他因素的重要性则因人工智能的使用而提高。从这些因素中的每一个因素,都制定了相应的最佳实践,这些实践在考虑到背景和平衡的情况下,可以作为初步的指导方针,以确保设计良好的人工智能更有可能服务于社会公益。